Judicial Review is the power of the Supreme Court or High Court to examine the constitutionality of the laws passed by the legislature and executive orders of both the Central and State governments. If they found inconsistent with the Constitution then declared as null and void. The power of Judicial Review flows from various articles of the Constitution like articles 13, 32, 132 and 226. Supreme Court has declared the power of Judicial Review as part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The UPSC Indian Polity and Governance Syllabus includes Power of Judicial Review which is described in this article.
Table of Contents
|
“Constitution without judicial review is unconstitutional.” |
Justice Syed Shah Mohamed Quadri has classified the judicial review into the following three categories.
A law or an executive order can be challenged in the Supreme Court on the following three grounds.
Though the phrase ‘Judicial Review’ has nowhere been used in the Constitution, the provisions of several articles explicitly confer the power on the Supreme Court and High Courts.
| Articles | Provisions |
|---|---|
| Article 13 | Declares that all laws that are inconsistent with or in derogation of the Fundamental Rights shall be null and void. |
| Article 32 | Guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights and empowers the Supreme Court to issue directions, orders, or writs. |
| Article 131 | Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the centre-state and intra-state disputes. |
| Article 132 | Provides for the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in a constitutional cases. |
| Article 133 | Provides for the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in civil cases. |
| Article 134 | Provides for the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in criminal cases. |
| Article 134-A | Deals with the certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court from the High Courts. |
| Article 135 | Empowers the Supreme Court to exercise the jurisdiction and powers of the federal court under any pre-constitutional law. |
| Article 226 | Empowers the high courts to conduct judicial reviews and issue directives, orders, or writs to enforce basic rights or other goals. |
| Article 227 | It vests in the high courts the ability to supervise all courts within their respective territorial jurisdiction (except military courts and tribunals). |
| Article 245 | Deals with the territorial extent of laws made by Parliament and by and state legislatures. |
| Article 246 | Deals with the subject matter of law made by Parliament and by state legislatures. |
| Articles 251 and 254 | Provide that in case of a conflict between the central law and state law, the central law prevails over the state law and the state law shall be void. |
| Article 372 | Deals with the continuance in force of the pre-constitutional laws. |
| Cases | Year | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala | 1973 | Established the doctrine of basic structure; limited the amending power of the Indian Parliament. |
| Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain | 1975 | Declared Indira Gandhi's election to Lok Sabha invalid, reinforcing judicial review over electoral matters. |
| Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India | 1978 | Expanded the scope of Article 21 and emphasized procedural fairness. |
| Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan | 1997 | Laid down guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at workplaces, asserting judicial review over administrative inaction. |
| S.R. Bommai v. Union of India | 1994 | Defined limits to the exercise of President's Rule, reinforcing judicial review over the proclamation of emergency. |
| Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala | 1973 | Established the doctrine of basic structure; limited the amending power of the Indian Parliament. |
| Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India | 2016 | Upheld the constitutional validity of Aadhaar, while emphasizing privacy as a fundamental right. |
| Fourth Judges Case | 2015 | By Fourth Judges Case (1998), SC struck down NJAC and as a result, the earlier collegium system became operational again. |
Certain doctrines have developed in the courts to serve as guides in the judicial review process.
When evaluating the challenged law, the court must determine whether the law is unconstitutional in its entirety or in sections. The court has the authority to declare the challenged law unconstitutional in its entirety or in part, as the case may be.
The Indian judiciary has been guided by the doctrine of progressive interpretation, which implies that the courts have construed the Constitution's provisions in light of the social, economic, and legal circumstances that existed at the time.
It is predicated on the assumption that judicial invalidation or a new interpretation of the law will have no effect on previous transactions or vested rights, but will only apply to future transactions.
While exercising the judicial review power. Courts are not designed to deal with hypothetical issues; the matter placed before them must be of a ‘Concrete' type. The Court strives to keep its conclusions as close to the controversy's original scope as possible. In a specific case, between the parties involved.
When a law's constitutional legitimacy is questioned, the court will not rule it ultra vires unless the invalidity is proven beyond a reasonable doubt, because there is always a presumption in favour of its constitutionality. The Supreme Court assumes that the legislature does not overstep its authority or pass legislation that is contrary to the spirit of the Constitution.
Judicial Review serves as a mechanism to uphold the constitutionality of laws and actions. It operates as a mechanism for ensuring that governmental actions are subject to legal scrutiny and accountability. It helps maintain the integrity of legal systems and protects the rights and interests of individuals within society.
Question: What is judicial review?
Answer: Judicial review refers to the power of the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court and High Courts, to examine the constitutionality of legislative acts and executive orders. If any law or action is found to violate the Constitution, the judiciary can declare it void.
Question: Which part of the Indian Constitution provides for judicial review?
Answer: Judicial review is implied in Articles 13, 32, 226, and 136 of the Indian Constitution, which allow the Supreme Court and High Courts to safeguard fundamental rights and ensure that laws are consistent with the Constitution.
Question: What is the significance of judicial review in India?
Answer: Judicial review is a fundamental feature of the Indian Constitution as it helps to maintain the supremacy of the Constitution, protect fundamental rights, and ensure the separation of powers among the three branches of government.
Question: Can judicial review be used to challenge constitutional amendments?
Answer: Yes, judicial review can be used to challenge constitutional amendments if they violate the "basic structure" of the Constitution, as established by the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973).
Question: What is the doctrine of basic structure?
Answer: The doctrine of basic structure, established by the Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharati case, states that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure, including fundamental rights, the rule of law, and judicial review.
a) Article 14
b) Article 32
c) Article 51
d) Article 280
Answer: (B) See the Explanation
Article 32 grants individuals the right to approach the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement of fundamental rights, and the power of judicial review stems from this provision.
a) Golaknath Case
b) Kesavananda Bharati Case
c) Minerva Mills Case
d) A.K. Gopalan Case
Answer: (B) See the Explanation
The Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) established the doctrine of basic structure, affirming the judiciary's power of judicial review over constitutional amendments.
a) Only the Supreme Court
b) Only the High Courts
c) Both the Supreme Court and High Courts
d) All courts
Answer: (C) See the Explanation
Judicial review can be exercised by both the Supreme Court and the High Courts, as per Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution.
a) Supremacy of Parliament
b) Supremacy of the Constitution
c) Executive dominance
d) Federalism
Answer: (B) See the Explanation
Judicial review is based on the principle that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any law or executive action that contravenes the Constitution can be declared unconstitutional.
a) Secularism
b) Judicial review
c) Federalism
d) Emergency provisions
Answer: (D) See the Explanation
While emergency provisions are important, they are not considered part of the "basic structure" of the Constitution, as identified in the Kesavananda Bharati case.
Q1: “Judicial review is an essential feature of the Indian Constitution.” Discuss.
Answer: Judicial review is a fundamental feature of the Indian Constitution, as it ensures the supremacy of the Constitution by allowing the judiciary to review the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. It acts as a safeguard for fundamental rights, protects the balance of power between different branches of government, and maintains the democratic framework of the country. Judicial review prevents arbitrary use of power by the legislature and executive, ensuring that they act within constitutional limits.
Q2: Examine the role of judicial review in upholding the doctrine of basic structure.
Answer: Judicial review plays a crucial role in upholding the doctrine of basic structure, which prevents Parliament from making amendments that alter the Constitution's core principles. Through judicial review, the courts ensure that any amendments or legislative actions do not infringe upon the essential features of the Constitution, such as democracy, secularism, and rule of law. This judicial mechanism preserves the integrity of the Constitution and safeguards it from potential misuse by the legislature.
Q3: Critically analyze the limitations of judicial review in India.
Answer: While judicial review is a powerful tool for upholding the Constitution and protecting citizens' rights, it has certain limitations. One major limitation is that judicial review cannot be applied to political decisions, which may limit its scope in holding the executive accountable. Additionally, judicial activism, where courts take on a more interventionist role, can blur the lines between the judiciary and legislature. Furthermore, the judiciary itself may sometimes overstep its boundaries, leading to concerns over judicial overreach. Balancing the use of judicial review with respect for the separation of powers is essential in maintaining its effectiveness within a democratic system.
Q1: Discuss the significance of judicial review in maintaining the supremacy of the Constitution in India.
Answer: Judicial review plays a crucial role in upholding the supremacy of the Constitution in India by ensuring that laws and executive actions adhere to constitutional principles. It allows the judiciary to invalidate laws or actions that violate fundamental rights or exceed constitutional limits. This helps maintain the balance of power between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government, ensuring that no law or action can undermine the Constitution’s core values.
Q2: Explain the doctrine of basic structure and its relation to judicial review in India.
Answer: The doctrine of basic structure, established in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), holds that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure. Judicial review allows the judiciary to scrutinize constitutional amendments to ensure that they do not violate fundamental principles like the rule of law, separation of powers, and fundamental rights. This doctrine ensures that key constitutional features remain intact, protecting the integrity of the Constitution.
*email: contactus@prepp.in
Download the PREPP App and attempt FREE IAS Exam Mock Tests and get complete study material!
Comments