All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only

Judicial Review - Indian Polity Notes

Judicial Review is the power of the Supreme Court or High Court to examine the constitutionality of the laws passed by the legislature and executive orders of both the Central and State governments. If they found inconsistent with the Constitution then declared as null and void. The power of Judicial Review flows from various articles of the Constitution like articles 13, 32, 132 and 226. Supreme Court has declared the power of Judicial Review as part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The UPSC Indian Polity and Governance Syllabus includes Power of Judicial Review which is described in this article.

UPSC CSE IAS

Judicial Review - Historical Background

  • The doctrine of judicial review is originated and developed in the USA.
  • It was established for the first time in the famous case of Marbury vs. Madison in 1803 by the then Chief Justice of the American Supreme Court John Marshall.
  • In India, the Constitution itself confers the power of Judicial review on both the Supreme Court and High Courts.
  • In the Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narain case of 1975, the Supreme Court declared Judicial Review as a basic feature of the Constitution.

Judicial Review

“Constitution without judicial review is unconstitutional.”

Classification of Judicial Review

Justice Syed Shah Mohamed Quadri has classified the judicial review into the following three categories.

  • Judicial review of constitutional amendments
  • Judicial review of the laws of the Parliament, state legislatures and subordinate legislations
  • Judicial review of administrative action of the Union, state and authorities under the state.

Scope of Judicial Review

A law or an executive order can be challenged in the Supreme Court on the following three grounds.

  1. If it infringes the Fundamental Rights
  2. If it is outside the competence of an authority which has framed it
  3. If it is repugnant to the Constitutional Provisions.

Significance of Judicial Review

  • It is important to uphold the supremacy of the Constitution.
  • It maintains the federal balance between the Centre and the states.
  • It serves as a vital mechanism for protecting Fundamental Rights and liberties from infringement by the government.
  • It reinforces the principle of the rule of law.
  • By providing a check on the actions of the executive and legislative, the judiciary helps to prevent the concentration of power in any one branch and promotes accountability and transparency in governance.

Constitutional Provisions for Judicial Review

Though the phrase ‘Judicial Review’ has nowhere been used in the Constitution, the provisions of several articles explicitly confer the power on the Supreme Court and High Courts.

Articles Provisions
Article 13 Declares that all laws that are inconsistent with or in derogation of the Fundamental Rights shall be null and void.
Article 32 Guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights and empowers the Supreme Court to issue directions, orders, or writs.
Article 131 Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the centre-state and intra-state disputes.
Article 132 Provides for the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in a constitutional cases.
Article 133 Provides for the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in civil cases.
Article 134 Provides for the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in criminal cases.
Article 134-A Deals with the certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court from the High Courts.
Article 135 Empowers the Supreme Court to exercise the jurisdiction and powers of the federal court under any pre-constitutional law.
Article 226 Empowers the high courts to conduct judicial reviews and issue directives, orders, or writs to enforce basic rights or other goals.
Article 227 It vests in the high courts the ability to supervise all courts within their respective territorial jurisdiction (except military courts and tribunals).
Article 245 Deals with the territorial extent of laws made by Parliament and by and state legislatures.
Article 246 Deals with the subject matter of law made by Parliament and by state legislatures.
Articles 251 and 254 Provide that in case of a conflict between the central law and state law, the central law prevails over the state law and the state law shall be void.
Article 372 Deals with the continuance in force of the pre-constitutional laws.

Cases Related to Judicial Review in India

Cases Year Outcome
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala 1973 Established the doctrine of basic structure; limited the amending power of the Indian Parliament.
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain 1975 Declared Indira Gandhi's election to Lok Sabha invalid, reinforcing judicial review over electoral matters.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India 1978 Expanded the scope of Article 21 and emphasized procedural fairness.
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan 1997 Laid down guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at workplaces, asserting judicial review over administrative inaction.
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India 1994 Defined limits to the exercise of President's Rule, reinforcing judicial review over the proclamation of emergency.
Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala 1973 Established the doctrine of basic structure; limited the amending power of the Indian Parliament.
Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India 2016 Upheld the constitutional validity of Aadhaar, while emphasizing privacy as a fundamental right.
Fourth Judges Case 2015 By Fourth Judges Case (1998), SC struck down NJAC and as a result, the earlier collegium system became operational again.

Guidelines in Judicial Review

Certain doctrines have developed in the courts to serve as guides in the judicial review process.

Doctrine of Severability

When evaluating the challenged law, the court must determine whether the law is unconstitutional in its entirety or in sections. The court has the authority to declare the challenged law unconstitutional in its entirety or in part, as the case may be.

The doctrine of Progressive interpretation

The Indian judiciary has been guided by the doctrine of progressive interpretation, which implies that the courts have construed the Constitution's provisions in light of the social, economic, and legal circumstances that existed at the time.

The doctrine of Prospective Overruling

It is predicated on the assumption that judicial invalidation or a new interpretation of the law will have no effect on previous transactions or vested rights, but will only apply to future transactions.

The doctrine of Empirical Adjudication

While exercising the judicial review power. Courts are not designed to deal with hypothetical issues; the matter placed before them must be of a ‘Concrete' type. The Court strives to keep its conclusions as close to the controversy's original scope as possible. In a specific case, between the parties involved.

The presumption in favour of Constitutionally

When a law's constitutional legitimacy is questioned, the court will not rule it ultra vires unless the invalidity is proven beyond a reasonable doubt, because there is always a presumption in favour of its constitutionality. The Supreme Court assumes that the legislature does not overstep its authority or pass legislation that is contrary to the spirit of the Constitution.

Limitations of Judicial Review

  • Justiciable Issues Only: The judiciary can only review laws that are justiciable, meaning they are capable of being resolved through legal principles and not matters of political discretion or policy.
  • Standing Requirements: In order to challenge a law or governmental action, the petitioner must have standing, meaning they must demonstrate a direct and personal stake in the outcome of the case.
  • Respect for Separation of Powers: The judiciary must respect the separation of powers and refrain from encroaching on the legislative or executive functions unless there's a clear violation of constitutional principles.
  • Deference to Legislative and Executive Expertise: In matters involving complex policy decisions, courts often defer to the expertise of the legislative and executive branches, recognizing their constitutional authority to make policy judgments.
  • Limits on Remedies: Even if a law or action is found unconstitutional, the judiciary's power to provide remedies may be limited by practical considerations or principles of judicial restraint.
Conclusion

Conclusion

Judicial Review serves as a mechanism to uphold the constitutionality of laws and actions. It operates as a mechanism for ensuring that governmental actions are subject to legal scrutiny and accountability. It helps maintain the integrity of legal systems and protects the rights and interests of individuals within society.

FAQs

Question: What is judicial review?

Answer: Judicial review refers to the power of the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court and High Courts, to examine the constitutionality of legislative acts and executive orders. If any law or action is found to violate the Constitution, the judiciary can declare it void.

Question: Which part of the Indian Constitution provides for judicial review?

Answer: Judicial review is implied in Articles 13, 32, 226, and 136 of the Indian Constitution, which allow the Supreme Court and High Courts to safeguard fundamental rights and ensure that laws are consistent with the Constitution.

Question: What is the significance of judicial review in India?

Answer: Judicial review is a fundamental feature of the Indian Constitution as it helps to maintain the supremacy of the Constitution, protect fundamental rights, and ensure the separation of powers among the three branches of government.

Question: Can judicial review be used to challenge constitutional amendments?

Answer: Yes, judicial review can be used to challenge constitutional amendments if they violate the "basic structure" of the Constitution, as established by the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973).

Question: What is the doctrine of basic structure?

Answer: The doctrine of basic structure, established by the Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharati case, states that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure, including fundamental rights, the rule of law, and judicial review.

MCQs

  1. Which of the following articles of the Indian Constitution primarily deals with judicial review?

a) Article 14

b) Article 32

c) Article 51

d) Article 280

Answer: (B) See the Explanation

Article 32 grants individuals the right to approach the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement of fundamental rights, and the power of judicial review stems from this provision.

  1. The doctrine of judicial review was established in India through which landmark case?

a) Golaknath Case

b) Kesavananda Bharati Case

c) Minerva Mills Case

d) A.K. Gopalan Case

Answer: (B) See the Explanation

The Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) established the doctrine of basic structure, affirming the judiciary's power of judicial review over constitutional amendments.

  1. Judicial review in India can be exercised by which courts?

a) Only the Supreme Court

b) Only the High Courts

c) Both the Supreme Court and High Courts

d) All courts

Answer: (C) See the Explanation

Judicial review can be exercised by both the Supreme Court and the High Courts, as per Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution.

  1. Judicial review in India is based on which of the following principles?

a) Supremacy of Parliament

b) Supremacy of the Constitution

c) Executive dominance

d) Federalism

Answer: (B) See the Explanation

Judicial review is based on the principle that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any law or executive action that contravenes the Constitution can be declared unconstitutional.

  1. Which of the following is not part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution?

a) Secularism

b) Judicial review

c) Federalism

d) Emergency provisions

Answer: (D) See the Explanation

While emergency provisions are important, they are not considered part of the "basic structure" of the Constitution, as identified in the Kesavananda Bharati case.

GS Mains Questions and Model Answers

Q1: “Judicial review is an essential feature of the Indian Constitution.” Discuss.

Answer: Judicial review is a fundamental feature of the Indian Constitution, as it ensures the supremacy of the Constitution by allowing the judiciary to review the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. It acts as a safeguard for fundamental rights, protects the balance of power between different branches of government, and maintains the democratic framework of the country. Judicial review prevents arbitrary use of power by the legislature and executive, ensuring that they act within constitutional limits.

Q2: Examine the role of judicial review in upholding the doctrine of basic structure.

Answer: Judicial review plays a crucial role in upholding the doctrine of basic structure, which prevents Parliament from making amendments that alter the Constitution's core principles. Through judicial review, the courts ensure that any amendments or legislative actions do not infringe upon the essential features of the Constitution, such as democracy, secularism, and rule of law. This judicial mechanism preserves the integrity of the Constitution and safeguards it from potential misuse by the legislature.

Q3: Critically analyze the limitations of judicial review in India.

Answer: While judicial review is a powerful tool for upholding the Constitution and protecting citizens' rights, it has certain limitations. One major limitation is that judicial review cannot be applied to political decisions, which may limit its scope in holding the executive accountable. Additionally, judicial activism, where courts take on a more interventionist role, can blur the lines between the judiciary and legislature. Furthermore, the judiciary itself may sometimes overstep its boundaries, leading to concerns over judicial overreach. Balancing the use of judicial review with respect for the separation of powers is essential in maintaining its effectiveness within a democratic system.

Previous Year Questions on Judicial Review

1. UPSC CSE 2018

Q1: Discuss the significance of judicial review in maintaining the supremacy of the Constitution in India. 

Answer: Judicial review plays a crucial role in upholding the supremacy of the Constitution in India by ensuring that laws and executive actions adhere to constitutional principles. It allows the judiciary to invalidate laws or actions that violate fundamental rights or exceed constitutional limits. This helps maintain the balance of power between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government, ensuring that no law or action can undermine the Constitution’s core values.

2. UPSC CSE 2019

Q2: Explain the doctrine of basic structure and its relation to judicial review in India. 

Answer: The doctrine of basic structure, established in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), holds that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its basic structure. Judicial review allows the judiciary to scrutinize constitutional amendments to ensure that they do not violate fundamental principles like the rule of law, separation of powers, and fundamental rights. This doctrine ensures that key constitutional features remain intact, protecting the integrity of the Constitution.

*email: contactus@prepp.in

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.
How likely are you to recommend Prepp.in to a friend or a colleague?
Not so likely
Highly likely

Comments

No comments to show
UPSC CSE (IAS) 2027 Prelims Mock Test Series
Live Quizzes
Free
• Live
UPSC IAS : Culture of India: Education, Philosophy and Science
12 Minutes
10 Questions
20 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Test will end on 27th Jul, 10:00 AM
View More
Quizzes
Free
24 July 2026 Daily CA Quiz for UPSC & State PSCs
8 Minutes
5 Questions
10 Marks
English, Hindi, Telugu +7 More
MEDIUM
Attempted by 473 aspirants in 12 hours
Free
23 July 2026 Daily CA Quiz for UPSC & State PSCs
8 Minutes
5 Questions
10 Marks
English, Hindi, Telugu +7 More
MEDIUM
Attempted by 463 aspirants in 12 hours
View More
Live Tests
Free
• Live
UPSC IAS : GS - Indian Economy - Subject Knowledge Test
35 Minutes
30 Questions
60 Marks
English, Hindi
Test will end in 01:14:32
plus
• Live
Live Test : UPSC CSE Prelims CSAT (Paper-II) (July 22 - 25)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Test will end in 02:14:32
View More
Full Tests
Free
Full Test - 01: UPSC CSE Prelims CSAT (Paper-II)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 15 aspirants in 12 hours
Free
Full Test - 01: UPSC CSE Prelims GS 2027
120 Minutes
100 Questions
200 Marks
1,024 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 13 aspirants in 12 hours
Previous Year Papers
plus
UPSC CSE Prelims 2026 GS Paper 1 Question Paper (24-May-2026)
120 Minutes
100 Questions
200 Marks
13,114 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 117 aspirants in 12 hours
plus
UPSC CSE Prelims 2026 CSAT Paper 2 Question Paper (24-May-2026)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
13,106 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 117 aspirants in 12 hours
View More