All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only

Right to Be Forgotten - Indian Polity Notes

Under certain circumstances, the right to be forgotten (RTBF) allows private information to be erased from internet searches. The subject of the Right to be Forgotten recently made headlines when an American citizen of Indian ancestry filed a petition to have a judgement against him removed from the internet.

Right to be forgotten is one of the topics of UPSC General Studies Syllabus which is also an important Current affairs part. Let us study the Right To be Forgotten topic in this article.

Concept

Right To Be Forgotten - Concept

  • The 'right to be forgotten' refers to the ability to have publicly accessible personal information erased from the internet, search engines, databases, websites, and other public platforms once it is no longer essential or relevant.
  • Since 2006, Argentina and the European Union have implemented the 'right to be forgotten.'
  • If a request is submitted, it allows for the authorized removal of an individual's personal information.
  • The right to be forgotten is not the same as the right to privacy.
  • The right to privacy protects information that is not in the public domain, but the right to be forgotten protects information that is in the public domain and prevents third parties from obtaining it.

Evolution in India

Right To Forgotten - Evolution In India

  • The draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2018 introduced by the Justice BN Srikrishna Committee includes a new right called the right to be forgotten, which refers to an individual's ability to limit, delink, delete, or correct the disclosure of personal information on the internet that is misleading, embarrassing, or irrelevant.
  • A data principal has the right to restrict the data fiduciary from using such data or information if data disclosure is no longer necessary, the agreement to use data has been revoked, or data is being used in violation of the law, according to Section 27 of the Bill.
  • In addition, section 27(2) states that the adjudicating officer (Data Protection Authority) has the authority to rule on the question of disclosure and the conditions in which he believes such disclosure can trump the freedom of speech and the right to information of citizens.
  • The right to be forgotten is in line with the right to privacy, which was lauded by the Supreme Court in the Puttaswamy decision of 2017 as an intrinsic aspect of Article 21 (right to life) of the constitution.
Related Issues

Right To Be Forgotten - Related Issues

  • The right not to be forgotten clashes with the right to information.
  • This can be shown in cases where a rape victim has a right to have her past forgotten, while a criminal cannot claim that he has the right to demand that his conviction not be mentioned in the media.
  • The Data Protection Authority must decide whether online data should be kept (right to information) or deleted (right to be forgotten) from the internet.
  • As a journalist must wait for the adjudicating officer's verdict, the right to be forgotten may become a threat to press freedom.
  • As a result, the right to criticize public figures for their public policies based on previous remarks and actions will be jeopardized.
  • Furthermore, a citizen requesting such information will be perplexed as to whether to contact the Central Information Commission or the Data Protection Authority.
  • For the sake of the national interest, the state retains unrestricted powers to collect and process data without the requirement for consent.
  • However, the national interest is not stated elsewhere, allowing the government to use the right to be forgotten at its discretion.
Pros & Cons

Pros And Cons Of Right To Be Forgotten

Disadvantages of Right to be Forgotten Advantages of Right to be Forgotten
  • The public's overall interest in viewing and accessing information may outweigh an individual's demand for privacy.
  • An individual has control over what information is seen to others.
  • It has the potential to limit the freedom of the media, journalists, and other parties.
  • RTBF can take down defamatory and slanderous information from the internet.
  • The notion of RTBF is wide and immature, with no precedence.
  • A third party has the ability to remove unlawfully uploaded content.
  • It's possible that Google and other search engines are swamped with requests to remove content, so it won't be removed right away.
  • A chance for a new beginning
  • There is a lack of openness when it comes to critical information about firms or people.
  • Information that poses a risk to one's personal or financial security can be erased.

Conclusion

Conclusion

  • Privacy must be added as a ground for reasonable restriction under Article 19 (2) in order to effectuate the right to be forgotten. This will require a major constitutional amendment.
  • On the one hand, there must be a balance between the right to privacy and personal data protection (as defined by Article 21 of the Indian constitution) and internet users' freedom of information (as defined by Article 19).

FAQs

Question: What is the 'Right to be Forgotten'?

Answer: The 'Right to be Forgotten' refers to an individual's right to request the removal of personal data from the internet, particularly when it is no longer relevant or accurate. This concept allows individuals to control their digital footprint and protects their privacy, especially in the context of social media and online platforms.

Question: Which international law recognizes the 'Right to be Forgotten'?

Answer: The 'Right to be Forgotten' is recognized in the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Under GDPR, individuals have the right to request the erasure of personal data when it is no longer necessary for the purposes for which it was collected or when it is processed unlawfully.

Question: Has India recognized the 'Right to be Forgotten' legally?

Answer: In India, the 'Right to be Forgotten' is not explicitly recognized in law yet, but it has been discussed in various judicial pronouncements. The Supreme Court of India has acknowledged the importance of privacy through its landmark ruling in the Puttaswamy case, which laid the groundwork for recognizing this right in the future.

Question: What is the impact of the 'Right to be Forgotten' on digital privacy?

Answer: The 'Right to be Forgotten' significantly enhances digital privacy by allowing individuals to reclaim control over their personal data. It balances the right to free speech and the right to privacy, particularly in cases where outdated or irrelevant information affects an individual's reputation or personal life.

Question: How does the Indian government regulate online privacy?

Answer: In India, the government has introduced the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, which seeks to regulate the processing of personal data. This bill includes provisions related to data subject rights, including the right to erasure, which aligns with the principles of the 'Right to be Forgotten'. However, it is still under review and has not yet become law.

MCQs

1. Which of the following European regulations recognizes the 'Right to be Forgotten'?

A) EU Data Protection Directive

B) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

C) Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)

D) Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR)

Answer: (B) See the Explanation

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union explicitly recognizes the 'Right to be Forgotten'. It allows individuals to request the removal of their personal data from online platforms when it is no longer necessary or relevant for the purposes it was collected.

2. Which landmark case in India laid the foundation for privacy rights, including the 'Right to be Forgotten'?

A) K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India

B) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India

C) Naz Foundation v. NCT of Delhi

D) R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu

Answer: (A) See the Explanation

The landmark case K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. This judgment paved the way for discussions around digital privacy and the 'Right to be Forgotten' in India.

3. In which of the following countries was the 'Right to be Forgotten' first legally recognized?

A) United States

B) India

C) France

D) Germany

Answer: (C) See the Explanation

The 'Right to be Forgotten' was first legally recognized by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in a landmark 2014 ruling in the case of Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos. The ruling was in favor of the right to request the removal of personal data from search engine results under certain conditions.

4. Which Indian bill includes provisions related to data subject rights like the 'Right to be Forgotten'?

A) Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures) Rules, 2011

B) Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019

C) Digital India Act, 2015

D) IT (Intermediary Guidelines) Rules, 2021

Answer: (B) See the Explanation

The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 includes provisions related to data subject rights, including the right to erasure, which is aligned with the concept of the 'Right to be Forgotten'. This bill aims to regulate the processing of personal data and protect individual privacy.

5. Which of the following is a key challenge in implementing the 'Right to be Forgotten'?

A) Limiting free speech

B) Data protection compliance

C) The global nature of the internet

D) Financial transparency

Answer: (C) See the Explanation

A key challenge in implementing the 'Right to be Forgotten' is the global nature of the internet. Data may be stored on servers located in different jurisdictions, which makes enforcement of this right complex. This requires international cooperation and standardized frameworks for data protection.

GS Mains Questions and Model Answers

Q1: Evaluate the significance of the 'Right to be Forgotten' in the context of digital privacy in India.

Answer: The 'Right to be Forgotten' is essential for protecting individual privacy in the digital age. In India, where digital penetration is growing, this right could help citizens control their personal information and mitigate the risks of reputational damage from outdated or irrelevant content online. With increasing data breaches and misuse of personal data, having a legal framework for such a right becomes critical. Although India has not yet enacted a specific law for the 'Right to be Forgotten', the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, could provide a legal basis for its enforcement. This right strikes a balance between privacy and free speech, ensuring that personal information does not remain accessible indefinitely, especially if it no longer serves any legitimate public interest.

Q2: Discuss the challenges India faces in implementing the 'Right to be Forgotten' and the potential solutions.

Answer: One of the main challenges India faces in implementing the 'Right to be Forgotten' is the lack of a clear and comprehensive legal framework. While the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, addresses some concerns, it does not explicitly recognize this right. Another challenge is the global nature of the internet, where personal data is hosted on servers located across multiple jurisdictions. This complicates enforcement and requires international cooperation. Additionally, there are concerns about its potential misuse to suppress freedom of speech or avoid accountability. Solutions include amending the Personal Data Protection Bill to clearly include the 'Right to be Forgotten', setting up robust data protection mechanisms, and establishing international agreements to govern data privacy across borders.

Q3: How does the 'Right to be Forgotten' intersect with freedom of speech and expression?

Answer: The 'Right to be Forgotten' often comes into conflict with the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. On one hand, it allows individuals to remove outdated or irrelevant personal information, which is crucial for protecting privacy. On the other hand, it could lead to censorship if used to suppress information that is in the public interest. The balance between these two rights is delicate. Courts must ensure that the right to privacy does not unduly infringe upon the freedom of expression, particularly in cases where the information is of public concern or historical importance. This is why the application of the 'Right to be Forgotten' should be carefully regulated, ensuring that it is not used for personal gain at the expense of societal interests.

Previous Year Questions on Right to be Forgotten

1. UPSC CSE Mains 2021 (General Studies Paper 2):

Question: Discuss the implications of the 'Right to be Forgotten' in India, particularly in the context of privacy and data protection laws.

Answer: In India, the 'Right to be Forgotten' has implications for both privacy and freedom of expression. While it can protect an individual's privacy, its implementation needs to be cautious to avoid conflicts with the freedom of speech. The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, is a step towards establishing a comprehensive framework that includes the right to erasure, but challenges remain in balancing privacy and public interest. Courts and regulators will play a pivotal role in ensuring that this right is not misused for censorship.

2. UPSC CSE Mains 2020 (General Studies Paper 2):

Question: How does the 'Right to be Forgotten' interact with global internet laws, and what challenges does India face in implementing this right?

Answer: The 'Right to be Forgotten' faces significant challenges due to the global nature of the internet. Data hosted in different countries may be subject to various legal frameworks, making enforcement difficult. India, with its growing digital landscape, must navigate these complexities while ensuring international cooperation for data protection. The lack of a comprehensive legal framework in India further complicates matters, though the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, offers a pathway forward.

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.
How likely are you to recommend Prepp.in to a friend or a colleague?
Not so likely
Highly likely

Comments

No comments to show
UPSC CSE (IAS) 2027 Prelims Mock Test Series
Live Quizzes
Free
• Live
UPSC IAS : Culture of India: Education, Philosophy and Science
12 Minutes
10 Questions
20 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Test will end on 27th Jul, 10:00 AM
View More
Quizzes
Free
24 July 2026 Daily CA Quiz for UPSC & State PSCs
8 Minutes
5 Questions
10 Marks
English, Hindi, Telugu +7 More
MEDIUM
Attempted by 479 aspirants in 12 hours
Free
23 July 2026 Daily CA Quiz for UPSC & State PSCs
8 Minutes
5 Questions
10 Marks
English, Hindi, Telugu +7 More
MEDIUM
Attempted by 469 aspirants in 12 hours
View More
Live Tests
Free
• Live
UPSC IAS : CSAT - Mini Live Test
40 Minutes
30 Questions
75 Marks
English, Hindi
Test will end in 22:45:25
Free
• Live
Live Test : UPSC CSE Prelims GS 2027 (July 25 - 28)
120 Minutes
100 Questions
200 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Test will end on 28th Jul, 07:00 PM
View More
Full Tests
Free
Full Test - 01: UPSC CSE Prelims CSAT (Paper-II)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 15 aspirants in 12 hours
Free
Full Test - 01: UPSC CSE Prelims GS 2027
120 Minutes
100 Questions
200 Marks
1,026 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 14 aspirants in 12 hours
Previous Year Papers
plus
UPSC CSE Prelims 2026 GS Paper 1 Question Paper (24-May-2026)
120 Minutes
100 Questions
200 Marks
13,136 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 118 aspirants in 12 hours
plus
UPSC CSE Prelims 2026 CSAT Paper 2 Question Paper (24-May-2026)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
13,128 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 119 aspirants in 12 hours
View More