In the Indian Parliament, there are many different types of legislation that are introduced in either chamber to legislate for a specific issue. However, there are times when bills expire before becoming law. Article 107 deals with certain situations under which bills lapse in Indian Parliament. This article discusses the details of bills that have expired in both the Central and State Legislatures.
|
Table of Contents |
In general, the legislature is the government's law-making organ, and every legislative proposal is presented in the form of a Bill, which is legislation that has been created but does not become law until it obtains the President's assent. Before being presented to the President of the country, the Bill must go through three readings in each of the Houses of Parliament, namely the Rajya Sabha (Upper House) and the Lok Sabha (Lower House) (Lower House). The three readings are:
In the State Legislature, a method identical to this is followed. Following these readings, the Bill is sent to the Upper House of Parliament by the Lower House, where it began. This is where the concept of "lapse of a Bill" comes into play. A legislative bill expires for one of two reasons:
In either event, the Bill expires in the Indian Parliament, delaying its passage through the process of receiving the President's approval and becoming an Act, or otherwise the law of the land. This article delves into the reasons for a bill's lapse and sheds light on the subject of a bill's lapse that later becomes a liability for both the Union and the State Legislature.
There are instances when certain Bills, despite the dissolution of the Lower House, are not considered to have lapsed.
The 74th Constitutional Amendment Bill was introduced in Parliament on September 7, 1990, however, it expired after the Lok Sabha was dissolved.
Question: What is meant by the 'lapsing of bills' in the Indian Parliament?
Answer: The 'lapsing of bills' refers to the automatic cessation or termination of the process of a bill if it does not proceed through all the stages of approval before the end of the session. Under the Indian Constitution, a bill that has been introduced in either House of Parliament but is not passed before the session ends lapses. However, certain bills such as Money Bills do not lapse, even if they are not passed, while others, like Constitutional Amendment Bills, have a special provision for re-introduction in the next session.
Question: Which types of bills do not lapse when the Lok Sabha is dissolved?
Answer: Money Bills do not lapse even when the Lok Sabha is dissolved. Money Bills are related to financial matters such as taxation, borrowing of money, and appropriation of funds, and have special provisions under Article 109 of the Constitution. These bills are considered crucial for the functioning of the government and are not subject to the same dissolution rules as ordinary bills.
Question: When does a bill lapse in the Indian Parliament?
Answer: A bill lapses in the Indian Parliament if it is not passed by either House of Parliament by the end of the session. If the bill is in the first or second house, it will lapse with the dissolution of the Lok Sabha or if the Rajya Sabha is prorogued. However, certain bills, such as Money Bills, and those that have been passed by one house but not the other, do not lapse automatically. Additionally, if a bill has passed through both Houses and is awaiting the President's assent, it does not lapse.
Question: What happens to bills that are pending with the President after the session ends?
Answer: Bills pending with the President for assent do not lapse when the session ends. Once the bill has passed both Houses of Parliament, it is sent to the President for approval. The President has the authority to give assent, withhold assent, or return the bill (if it is not a Money Bill) for reconsideration by Parliament. The bill remains active until the President takes a final decision on it, even if the session ends.
Question: What is the impact of the dissolution of the Lok Sabha on pending bills?
Answer: The dissolution of the Lok Sabha results in the lapsing of all bills that are pending in that House. This means that any bill which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha before its dissolution will not continue in the subsequent session. Such bills must be reintroduced in the new session if the government wishes to pursue them further. However, bills in the Rajya Sabha, or those that have already passed the Lok Sabha, are not affected by the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
1. Which of the following bills does not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha?
A) Money Bills
B) Private Members' Bills
C) Private Members' Bills introduced in the Rajya Sabha
D) Constitution Amendment Bills
Answer: (A) See the Explanation
Explanation: Money Bills are not affected by the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. They are considered vital for the functioning of the government and are not subject to the same lapsing rules as ordinary bills.
2. What happens to a bill passed by the Lok Sabha but not by the Rajya Sabha at the time of the dissolution of the Lok Sabha?
A) It automatically lapses
B) It is sent to the President
C) It is reconsidered in the next session
D) It becomes a law
Answer: (A) See the Explanation
Explanation: A bill passed by the Lok Sabha but not the Rajya Sabha lapses upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. The bill will need to be reintroduced in the next session.
3. Which type of bill does not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha?
A) Ordinary Bill
B) Money Bill
C) Private Member's Bill
D) State Bill
Answer: (B) See the Explanation
Explanation: Money Bills, which are related to financial matters, do not lapse even if the Lok Sabha is dissolved. They are considered essential for the financial functioning of the government.
4. If a bill has been passed by both Houses of Parliament but is awaiting the President's assent, what happens to the bill after the session ends?
A) The bill lapses
B) The bill remains pending until the President gives assent
C) The bill becomes a law automatically
D) The bill must be reintroduced in the next session
Answer: (B) See the Explanation
Explanation: A bill awaiting the President’s assent does not lapse when the session ends. It remains pending until the President makes a decision on it.
5. What is the general rule regarding the lapsing of bills in the Indian Parliament?
A) Bills do not lapse under any circumstances
B) Bills passed by either House of Parliament do not lapse
C) All bills lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha
D) Only Money Bills do not lapse upon dissolution of the Lok Sabha
Answer: (C) See the Explanation
Explanation: Generally, all bills lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. However, there are exceptions such as Money Bills, which do not lapse under any circumstances.
Q1: Analyze the significance of the provision of lapsing of bills in the context of parliamentary democracy in India.
Answer: The provision for lapsing of bills in India ensures that the legislative process is efficient and time-bound. This provision discourages indefinite delays in passing bills and provides a natural deadline by which legislation must be completed. In the context of parliamentary democracy, this mechanism serves to maintain the rhythm and accountability of the legislature, ensuring that bills are either passed or rejected within a specific period. However, certain bills, such as Money Bills, are exempt from this provision, ensuring the continuity of essential financial matters for governance. This balance reflects the flexibility of India’s parliamentary system while maintaining the core principle of democratic oversight.
Q2: What are the constitutional and procedural implications of the lapsing of bills in the Indian legislative system?
Answer: The lapsing of bills in India is governed by Articles 107 and 108 of the Constitution, which detail the procedure for the introduction, passage, and dissolution of bills. The dissolution of the Lok Sabha results in the lapsing of all bills that have not been passed, unless they fall under specific categories such as Money Bills. Procedurally, this requires the re-introduction of such bills in the subsequent session of Parliament. While this ensures the efficiency of legislative processes, it also raises concerns regarding long-term legislative agendas, especially for bills that are critical to the administration. The lapsing mechanism reflects the importance of keeping the Parliament active and responsive to public needs, but it can also lead to delays if the political will to reintroduce key bills is lacking.
Q3: How does the provision of lapsing of bills align with the principle of accountability in the Indian parliamentary system?
Answer: The lapsing of bills in the Indian parliamentary system promotes accountability by ensuring that legislative action is timely and not delayed unnecessarily. It encourages lawmakers to prioritize important bills and ensures that those which fail to secure sufficient support within the time limits are not carried over indefinitely. This aligns with the principles of accountability, as it keeps elected representatives focused on legislative work and ensures that laws reflect the will of the people within a reasonable timeframe. Additionally, the provision prevents the unnecessary accumulation of unfinished legislative business, helping to keep the system efficient and responsive to the changing needs of the public.
Question: What happens to a bill if it is not passed by both Houses of Parliament during the same session?
A) The bill is automatically passed
B) The bill lapses
C) The bill is reconsidered in the next session
D) The bill is sent to the President
Answer: (B)
Explanation: If a bill is not passed by both Houses of Parliament during the same session, it lapses automatically. This ensures that the legislative process remains active and responsive.
Question: Critically analyze the lapsing of bills in the context of parliamentary efficiency and the challenges faced by the Indian legislative system.
Answer: The lapsing of bills is a crucial feature of parliamentary efficiency, ensuring that unfinished business does not carry over indefinitely. However, this provision can pose challenges in situations where important legislation is delayed due to political disagreements or lack of time. Some bills, particularly complex ones requiring extensive debate, may struggle to meet the deadlines, leading to their reintroduction in subsequent sessions. This can create a cycle of legislative delays, particularly when there is a lack of consensus. Nonetheless, the provision generally contributes to a streamlined and accountable process, as it forces parliamentarians to prioritize essential legislation and avoid procrastination in passing laws.
Download the PREPP App and attempt FREE IAS Exam Mock Tests and get complete study material!
Comments