Which option is WRONG?
Secondary data is original
The question asks us to identify the incorrect statement regarding data types, specifically focusing on secondary data. To do this, we first need to understand the fundamental difference between primary data and secondary data in research and statistics.
Primary data is data that is collected by the researcher for the very first time. It is original data gathered specifically for the current research problem or objective. Examples include data collected through surveys, interviews, experiments, or direct observations conducted by the researcher.
Secondary data, on the other hand, refers to data that has already been collected by someone else for a purpose other than the current research. This data is not original for the current study. It exists in various forms, such as published reports, government statistics, company records, academic papers, or online databases.
Let's examine each option provided in the question:
Option 1: Secondary data requires less time and money than primary data
This statement is generally correct. Since secondary data has already been collected and compiled, accessing it typically takes less time and involves lower costs compared to collecting original primary data, which requires planning, data collection instruments, fieldwork, etc.
Option 2: Secondary data is less reliable and less suitable than primary data
This statement can be correct in many cases. Secondary data was collected for a different purpose, which might not perfectly align with the needs of the current research. The methods used for its collection might not be known, controlled, or suitable, potentially affecting its reliability and suitability for the specific research question.
Option 3: Secondary data refer to those data that have already been collected by some other person.
This statement is the standard definition of secondary data. It accurately describes secondary data as data previously collected by someone else.
Option 4: Secondary data is original
This statement is incorrect. By definition, secondary data is *not* original data for the current research. Original data collected for the first time for a specific research purpose is called primary data. Secondary data is data that already exists, having been collected previously by someone else.
Based on the analysis of each option and the definitions of primary and secondary data, the statement that is WRONG is that secondary data is original. Secondary data is by definition not original; it is data that has been collected previously.
| Feature | Primary Data | Secondary Data |
|---|---|---|
| Originality | Original (collected for the first time) | Not Original (collected by someone else previously) |
| Collection Effort | High (surveys, interviews, experiments) | Low (accessing existing sources) |
| Cost and Time | More time and money | Less time and money |
| Suitability for Current Study | Generally highly suitable (collected for this purpose) | Suitability varies (collected for a different purpose) |
| Reliability | Higher control over quality | Reliability needs careful evaluation |
The incorrect statement among the options is that secondary data is original. Secondary data is characterized by having been collected previously by someone else, making it non-original for the current research.
| Aspect | Primary Data | Secondary Data |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Collected for the first time for the specific research problem. | Already collected and available from other sources. |
| Source | First-hand sources (surveys, interviews, experiments). | Second-hand sources (publications, databases, reports). |
| Cost & Time | High | Low |
| Control over Collection | High | None |
| Relevance & Accuracy | High (tailored to need) | Varies (may not fit perfectly, accuracy depends on original source) |
Secondary data can be obtained from numerous sources. These sources are typically categorized as internal or external.
While using secondary data saves time and cost, researchers must carefully evaluate its relevance, accuracy, reliability, and suitability before incorporating it into their study.
A set of annual numerical data, comparable over the years, is given for the last 12 years.
Consider the following statements:
1. The data is best represented by a broken line graph, each corner (turning point) representing the data of one year.
2. Such a graph depicts the chronological change and also enables one to make a short-term forecast.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?Consider the following statements:
Statement 1: Range is not a good measure of dispersion.
Statement 2: Range is highly affected by the existence of extreme values.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Data can be represented in which of the following forms?
1. Textual form
2. Tabula form
3. Graphical form
Select the correct answer using the code given below.Which statement of the following is incorrect?
When the collected data is grouped with reference to time, we have