Which option is WRONG?
Secondary data is original
The question asks us to identify the incorrect statement regarding data types, specifically focusing on secondary data. To do this, we first need to understand the fundamental difference between primary data and secondary data in research and statistics.
Primary data is data that is collected by the researcher for the very first time. It is original data gathered specifically for the current research problem or objective. Examples include data collected through surveys, interviews, experiments, or direct observations conducted by the researcher.
Secondary data, on the other hand, refers to data that has already been collected by someone else for a purpose other than the current research. This data is not original for the current study. It exists in various forms, such as published reports, government statistics, company records, academic papers, or online databases.
Let's examine each option provided in the question:
Option 1: Secondary data requires less time and money than primary data
This statement is generally correct. Since secondary data has already been collected and compiled, accessing it typically takes less time and involves lower costs compared to collecting original primary data, which requires planning, data collection instruments, fieldwork, etc.
Option 2: Secondary data is less reliable and less suitable than primary data
This statement can be correct in many cases. Secondary data was collected for a different purpose, which might not perfectly align with the needs of the current research. The methods used for its collection might not be known, controlled, or suitable, potentially affecting its reliability and suitability for the specific research question.
Option 3: Secondary data refer to those data that have already been collected by some other person.
This statement is the standard definition of secondary data. It accurately describes secondary data as data previously collected by someone else.
Option 4: Secondary data is original
This statement is incorrect. By definition, secondary data is *not* original data for the current research. Original data collected for the first time for a specific research purpose is called primary data. Secondary data is data that already exists, having been collected previously by someone else.
Based on the analysis of each option and the definitions of primary and secondary data, the statement that is WRONG is that secondary data is original. Secondary data is by definition not original; it is data that has been collected previously.
| Feature | Primary Data | Secondary Data |
|---|---|---|
| Originality | Original (collected for the first time) | Not Original (collected by someone else previously) |
| Collection Effort | High (surveys, interviews, experiments) | Low (accessing existing sources) |
| Cost and Time | More time and money | Less time and money |
| Suitability for Current Study | Generally highly suitable (collected for this purpose) | Suitability varies (collected for a different purpose) |
| Reliability | Higher control over quality | Reliability needs careful evaluation |
The incorrect statement among the options is that secondary data is original. Secondary data is characterized by having been collected previously by someone else, making it non-original for the current research.
| Aspect | Primary Data | Secondary Data |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Collected for the first time for the specific research problem. | Already collected and available from other sources. |
| Source | First-hand sources (surveys, interviews, experiments). | Second-hand sources (publications, databases, reports). |
| Cost & Time | High | Low |
| Control over Collection | High | None |
| Relevance & Accuracy | High (tailored to need) | Varies (may not fit perfectly, accuracy depends on original source) |
Secondary data can be obtained from numerous sources. These sources are typically categorized as internal or external.
While using secondary data saves time and cost, researchers must carefully evaluate its relevance, accuracy, reliability, and suitability before incorporating it into their study.
The grouped data for the observation are
| Class: | 1-3 | 3-5 | 5-7 |
| Frequency: | 2 | 1 | 2 |
The population skewness
For the following frequency distribution
| Class: | 3-5 | 5-7 | 7-9 | 9-11 |
| Frequency: | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
the value of mode is:
Which one is not basis of classification of data?
Which of the following options is correct when data is classified on the basis of attributes?
The grouped data for the observation are as follows.
| Class: | 2-4 | 4-6 | 6-8 |
| Frequency: | 2 | 1 | 2 |
The population skewness:
The arithmetic mean of the following frequency distribution of number of accidents Xon week working days is:
| X: | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| Frequency: | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
The systematic (methodological) arrangement of the statistical data in columns or rows is called:
Mutual and unique variances among multiple factors can be embodied in a diagram that comprises overlapping circles. The diagram is known as:
Which statement of the following is incorrect?
The graphical representation of the time series is known as:
Consider the following LPP.:
Max Z = 15x 1 + 10x 2
Subject to the constraints
4x 1 + 6x 2 ≤ 360
3x 1 + 0x 2 ≤ 180
0x 1 + 5x 2 ≤ 200
x 1, x 2 ≥ 0
The solution of the LPP using Graphical solution-technique is :
A graph of a cumulative frequency distribution is called :
Which of the following is not an example of compressed data?
A cumulative frequency distribution is given below
Class | 60-62 | 63-65 | 66-68 | 69-71 | 72-74 |
Cumulative frequency | 3 | 20 | 36 | 48 | 50 |
Which one of the following class has maximum frequency?
The measure of the central tendency is given by the X-coordinate of the point of intersection of the more than ogive and less than ogive is: