The Parliamentary form of government has its own merits and demerits. The main merits and demerits of the parliamentary form of government are coordination between Legislature and Executive, Flexibility of the government and Instability of the government, no strict separation of powers respectively. As the merits outweigh the demerits, the Indian Constitution makers choose the Parliamentary System of Government. In this article, we will see what is a parliamentary form of government and what are its merits and demerits.
|
Table of Contents |

| Other Relevant Links | |
|---|---|
| Collective Responsibility | Separation of Powers |
| Political Homogeneity | Unicameral and Bicameral legislature |
Every system, whether presidential or parliamentary, has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. It is up to the government of a given country to choose the system that is most suited to their needs. Because every country is unique in terms of its structure, people, and culture, it is critical to understand the country's needs.
Question: What is the Parliamentary form of government?
Answer: It is a system of governance where the executive is responsible to the legislature, and the Prime Minister is the head of the government, while the President is the nominal head of state.
Question: What is a key feature of the Parliamentary form of government?
Answer: The fusion of powers between the executive and legislative branches is a hallmark of the parliamentary system.
Question: How is the Prime Minister chosen in a Parliamentary government?
Answer: The Prime Minister is typically the leader of the majority party in the lower house (Lok Sabha in India).
Question: What are the merits of a Parliamentary form of government?
Answer: It ensures accountability, promotes cooperation between the executive and legislature, and provides a system for quick decision-making.
Question: What are the demerits of a Parliamentary form of government?
Answer: It can lead to unstable governments, undue influence of the legislature over the executive, and frequent elections if no party holds a majority.
a) Separation of powers
b) Fusion of powers
c) Direct election of the President
d) Federalism
Answer: (B) See the Explanation
In a Parliamentary system, the executive and legislative branches are fused, as the Prime Minister and the cabinet are drawn from the legislature and are accountable to it.
a) Prime Minister
b) President
c) Speaker
d) Chief Justice
Answer: (B) See the Explanation
In a Parliamentary system, the President is the ceremonial head of the state, while the Prime Minister is the head of the government.
a) Stable government
b) Accountability to the legislature
c) Frequent elections
d) Strong executive
Answer: (C) See the Explanation
Parliamentary systems can lead to frequent elections and unstable governments if no single party gains a majority in the legislature.
a) By direct election
b) By the President
c) By the legislature
d) By the judiciary
Answer: (C) See the Explanation
The Prime Minister is typically the leader of the majority party in the legislature (Lok Sabha in India) and is appointed by the President.
a) Collective responsibility
b) Single executive
c) Fixed tenure for the executive
d) Cabinet accountability
Answer: (C) See the Explanation
The executive in a parliamentary system does not have a fixed tenure. The government can fall at any time if it loses the confidence of the legislature.
Q1: Analyze the advantages of the Parliamentary system in ensuring democratic accountability.
Answer: The Parliamentary system promotes accountability as the executive is directly responsible to the legislature. The government must have the confidence of the majority of the legislative body, ensuring that it remains answerable to the representatives of the people. This system also allows for a more dynamic relationship between the legislature and executive, enabling quick decisions when necessary. The Prime Minister and the cabinet can be removed by a vote of no confidence, making the system highly responsive to the legislature.
Q2: Examine the challenges posed by the Parliamentary system in maintaining stable governments.
Answer: The Parliamentary system, while promoting accountability, often leads to government instability, particularly in fragmented political landscapes. In cases where no party gains a majority, coalition governments are formed, which can be unstable and prone to frequent collapses. This may result in frequent elections and policy paralysis. Furthermore, the system’s dependence on legislative support can limit the executive's ability to take bold or unpopular decisions, which may be necessary for long-term national interests.
Q3: Critically assess the fusion of powers in a Parliamentary system and its implications for governance.
Answer: The fusion of powers in the Parliamentary system, where the executive is drawn from the legislature, promotes efficiency in governance by reducing friction between the two branches. It ensures smooth coordination in policy-making and implementation. However, this fusion can also lead to the dominance of the legislature over the executive, reducing the autonomy of the government. Moreover, this can result in executive decisions being overly influenced by political considerations, leading to short-term populism rather than long-term policy planning.
Question: Which of the following is a feature of the Parliamentary form of government?
A. Presidential veto
B. Fixed tenure of the executive
C. Collective responsibility
D. Separation of powers
Answer: C
Explanation: Collective responsibility is a key feature of a Parliamentary system, where the entire cabinet is responsible to the legislature for its actions.
Question: Discuss the merits and demerits of the Parliamentary system in ensuring democratic governance.
Answer: The merits of the Parliamentary system include accountability, as the executive is responsible to the legislature, and flexibility, allowing governments to be dissolved if they lose confidence. This system promotes cooperation between the executive and legislature, leading to faster decision-making. However, the system can also lead to frequent elections and government instability, particularly in cases of fragmented legislatures, where no party holds a majority. It can also lead to the dominance of the executive by the legislature, which may hinder independent decision-making.
Question: Which of the following is a demerit of the Parliamentary system?
A. Political stability
B. Weak executive
C. Fixed tenure of the government
D. Presidential veto
Answer: B
Explanation: One of the criticisms of the Parliamentary system is that the executive is dependent on the confidence of the legislature, which can sometimes result in a weak or unstable government.
Download the PREPP App and attempt FREE IAS Exam Mock Tests and get complete study material!
Comments