The 1920s Akali movement, which began as a strictly religious movement to reform Gurdwaras, or Sikh holy temples, quickly took on a political dimension and became an integral component of India's liberation struggle. Apart from being anti-imperialist, the Akali movement, also known as the Gurdwara Reform Movement or Gurdwara agitations, describes the Sikhs' long-running struggle in the early twentieth century for the freedom of their Gurudwara, or holy temple. Nonviolent agitation marches, divans or religious meetings, and protests for Sikhs to express their freedom to control their place of worship drew fervent support, especially from rural people. Finally, the government had to give in to public pressure and allow Sikhs to administer their shrines, resulting in the Gurdwara Act of 1925 which created the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC), to act as custodian of all significant Sikh sites of worship. This article will explain to you about the Akali Movement which will be helpful in Modern Indian History preparation for the UPSC Civil service exam.
|
Table of Contents |

Akali Movement
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Gurudwara Movement | Rahnumai Mazdasaysnan Sabha |
| Nirankari Movement | Babbar Akali Movement |
| Namdhari Movement | Singh Sabha |
During this movement, the Sikhs faced the cruelty and death inflicted on them by the British Government and the Mahants, who were supported by the British, with great calm and courage. In July 1925, the Gurdwara Reform Act was passed, putting all Gurdwaras in Punjab under Panthic control. This power was to be wielded by elected Panthic bodies, namely the Shiromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee and local Gurdwara Committees. Thus, corrupt elements and practices were removed from holy places, and their income could be used to spread the Sikh faith and benefit the community.
Question: What is the current method for estimating poverty in India?
Answer: Poverty estimation in India is currently led by NITI Aayog, using data from the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) under the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI). The primary measure is based on consumption expenditure, which reflects household spending on goods and services, rather than income levels, to determine the poverty line.
Question: Why does India use consumption expenditure instead of income levels for poverty estimation?
Answer: Consumption expenditure is preferred over income due to its stability and reliability. In a largely informal economy, where income levels can be unpredictable, consumption patterns are seen as a more accurate representation of living standards and provide a clearer view of poverty.
Question: How has the definition of the poverty line evolved in India?
Answer: India’s definition of the poverty line has been refined through various committees. Initially, the Alagh Committee in 1979 emphasized calorie-based measures. The Lakdawala Committee in 1993 and the Tendulkar Committee in 2009 incorporated broader metrics like education and health. The Rangarajan Committee in 2014 proposed adjustments to better reflect current economic realities.
Question: What role does NITI Aayog play in poverty estimation?
Answer: NITI Aayog coordinates with various agencies to establish methodologies for poverty estimation and monitor trends. By analyzing data from the NSSO and other sources, it provides policy guidance, ensuring targeted poverty alleviation measures and economic planning.
Question: What is the difference between the poverty gap index and the headcount ratio?
Answer: The headcount ratio indicates the percentage of people below the poverty line, showing prevalence. The poverty gap index measures the depth of poverty, quantifying the average deficit of income or consumption from the poverty line, indicating the intensity of poverty among the poor.
1. Which committee recommended including health and education in India's poverty line estimation?
A) Alagh Committee
B) Lakdawala Committee
C) Tendulkar Committee
D) Rangarajan Committee
Answer: (C) See the Explanation
Explanation: The Tendulkar Committee, in 2009, broadened the poverty line estimation to include health and education expenditures, aligning with modern welfare considerations.
2. Why does India prefer consumption expenditure over income levels for poverty estimation?
A) Easier data collection
B) More stable and reliable measure
C) Government policy
D) International standards
Answer: (B) See the Explanation
Explanation: Consumption expenditure is considered more stable and reflective of actual living standards than income, which can vary significantly due to informality in employment.
3. Which organization collects data for poverty estimation in India?
A) Reserve Bank of India
B) Ministry of Finance
C) National Sample Survey Office
D) NITI Aayog
Answer: (C) See the Explanation
Explanation: The NSSO, under the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, gathers consumption data used in poverty estimations in India.
4. The current official poverty line in India is based on the recommendations of which committee?
A) Alagh Committee
B) Lakdawala Committee
C) Tendulkar Committee
D) Rangarajan Committee
Answer: (C) See the Explanation
Explanation: The Tendulkar Committee's recommendations are the foundation of India's present poverty line, incorporating a wider range of economic indicators.
5. What does the poverty gap index measure?
A) The percentage of people below the poverty line
B) The average shortfall from the poverty line
C) The rate of poverty reduction
D) Income inequality among the poor
Answer: (B) See the Explanation
Explanation: The poverty gap index shows the average shortfall from the poverty line among the poor, indicating how far below the poverty line the average poor person's income or consumption lies.
Q1: Analyze the evolution of poverty estimation methods in India and their implications on policy-making.
Answer: Over the decades, poverty estimation in India has evolved through various committee recommendations. The Alagh Committee (1979) set calorie-based thresholds. The Lakdawala Committee (1993) extended the focus to consumption without adjusting for inflation. The Tendulkar Committee (2009) shifted the methodology by including health and education, aligning with global standards. The Rangarajan Committee (2014) refined these measures for accuracy. This evolution has informed policy-making, guiding targeted interventions and more nuanced poverty alleviation strategies that address broader social and economic needs.
Q2: Discuss the advantages and challenges of using consumption expenditure as the basis for poverty estimation in India.
Answer: Consumption expenditure offers a more stable representation of living conditions compared to income, which is often irregular and difficult to track in India's informal sector. This method helps policymakers assess actual household well-being more effectively. However, challenges include potential underreporting and discrepancies in data collection, particularly in rural and seasonal economies. Moreover, this approach may not fully capture non-cash benefits and services. Addressing these gaps requires enhanced data collection techniques and complementary indicators to ensure comprehensive poverty measurement.
Q3: Evaluate the role of NITI Aayog in modern poverty estimation and policy formulation in India.
Answer: NITI Aayog plays a central role in modernizing poverty estimation and advising on policy formulation. By coordinating with the NSSO and developing methodologies, NITI Aayog shapes accurate assessments of poverty levels. It leverages multi-dimensional data for targeted welfare measures, ensuring alignment with current socio-economic conditions. Despite challenges like data quality and survey frequency, NITI Aayog’s efforts contribute to informed decision-making and strategic resource allocation, which enhances the effectiveness of poverty alleviation programs.
Question: Which of the following indices measures the intensity of poverty?
A) Human Development Index
B) Gini Coefficient
C) Poverty Gap Index
D) Multidimensional Poverty Index
Answer: (C)
Explanation: The Poverty Gap Index measures how far below the poverty line the average poor person’s income or consumption is, indicating the intensity of poverty.
Question: "Critically analyze the effectiveness of the current poverty estimation methods in India. What improvements would you suggest for better policy implementation?"
Answer: India’s poverty estimation, based primarily on consumption expenditure, has highlighted the proportion living below the poverty line. While it captures some aspects of poverty, it overlooks dimensions like education, health, and housing. The Tendulkar and Rangarajan Committees’ recommendations improved the method, but further adoption of a Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) could offer deeper insights. Improved data collection technology and real-time analysis would enhance the method’s relevance, ensuring comprehensive policy frameworks to address diverse poverty indicators.
Download the PREPP App and attempt FREE IAS Exam Mock Tests and get complete study material!
Comments