Thorndike's Trial and error learning is limited because it:
Ignores cognition
Edward Thorndike's trial and error theory explains learning purely in terms of stimulus-response connections strengthened or weakened through the law of effect, based on repeated attempts and observable outcomes.
This behaviourist framework does not account for internal mental processes such as thinking, understanding, or reasoning, meaning it ignores cognition entirely.
It is unrelated to the Zone of Proximal Development, a Vygotskian concept, and it does not encourage insight or abstraction, which are hallmarks of cognitive learning theories like Gestalt psychology.
Therefore, trial and error learning is limited because it ignores cognition.
A student who stops participating after harsh criticism demonstrates limitation of:
A facilitator who combines group discussion and reinforcement, is using :
Operant conditioning mainly deals with :
Continuous reinforcement produces behaviour that :
A Grade 8 student improves test performance only when praised publicly. This best illustrates :
Operant conditioning differs from classical conditioning because it :
Negative reinforcement differs from punishment because it :
Which of Thorndike's primary laws of learning suggests that a response followed by a satisfying state of affairs is more likely to recur when the situation is repeated ?
Thorndike's 'Trial-and-Error' theory implies that learning is the result of establishing connections between :
A student improves handwriting after repeated practice. This reflects Thorndike's :
A student who stops participating after harsh criticism demonstrates limitation of:
A facilitator who combines group discussion and reinforcement, is using :