Negative reinforcement differs from punishment because it :
increases responses
Negative reinforcement works by removing an unpleasant/aversive stimulus when a desired behaviour occurs, which strengthens and increases the frequency of that behaviour.
Punishment, in contrast, aims to decrease the frequency of an undesired behaviour by adding an aversive consequence or removing a pleasant one.
A learning plateau and stopping the learning process describe neither of these mechanisms accurately, and "decreases responses" describes punishment's effect, not negative reinforcement's.
Hence, negative reinforcement differs from punishment because it increases responses.
Thorndike's Trial and error learning is limited because it:
A student who stops participating after harsh criticism demonstrates limitation of:
A facilitator who combines group discussion and reinforcement, is using :
Operant conditioning mainly deals with :
Continuous reinforcement produces behaviour that :
A Grade 8 student improves test performance only when praised publicly. This best illustrates :
Operant conditioning differs from classical conditioning because it :
Which of Thorndike's primary laws of learning suggests that a response followed by a satisfying state of affairs is more likely to recur when the situation is repeated ?
Thorndike's 'Trial-and-Error' theory implies that learning is the result of establishing connections between :
A student improves handwriting after repeated practice. This reflects Thorndike's :
Thorndike's Trial and error learning is limited because it:
A student who stops participating after harsh criticism demonstrates limitation of: