A child stops talking in class after being laughed at by his peers for his stammering. This illustrates:
Punishment influencing behavior
Being laughed at is an unpleasant social consequence that follows the act of speaking, and the child's response is to stop that behaviour to avoid the discomfort.
Positive reinforcement would strengthen a behaviour through a pleasant consequence, insight learning involves a sudden grasp of a solution, and trial and error involves testing different responses until one works, none of which match a behaviour being suppressed by ridicule.
Since an unpleasant consequence is reducing the frequency of speaking, this is a case of punishment shaping behaviour.
Reinforcement schedules affect:
Law of Effect is especially useful in the classroom for:
Thorndike's Trial and error learning is limited because it:
A student who stops participating after harsh criticism demonstrates limitation of:
Continuous reinforcement produces behaviour that :
A Grade 8 student improves test performance only when praised publicly. This best illustrates :
Operant conditioning differs from classical conditioning because it :
A facilitator who combines group discussion and reinforcement, is using :
Operant conditioning mainly deals with :
Negative reinforcement differs from punishment because it :
"Give me a dozen of healthy children. I can make them doctors, judges, teachers, beggars and even thieves."