S2: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan.
The second sentence:
Analyzing Sentence S1: India's National Bird
Sentence 1 (S1) establishes a key fact: The peacock is India's national bird. This statement identifies a specific bird species and its designation as a symbol for the entire country.
Understanding Sentence S2: Rajasthan's State Bird
Sentence 2 (S2) presents a related but distinct piece of information: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan. This identifies a different bird species and its specific designation within one particular state of India, Rajasthan.
Examining the Relationship Between S1 and S2
To determine how S2 relates to S1, we consider the following points:
- Topic Relevance: Both sentences focus on birds designated with official status within India, one at the national level and the other at the state level.
- Information Nature: S1 declares a national symbol. S2 declares a state symbol. These are different categories of official recognition.
- Absence of Contradiction: S2 does not contradict S1. The fact that the peacock is the national bird does not conflict with the Great Indian Bustard being the state bird of Rajasthan.
- Additionality of Information: S2 expands on the theme of official birds in India by providing information specific to a state. It adds another layer of detail about bird designations within the country, complementing the national information in S1.
- Information Escalation: S2 does not escalate the information from S1; rather, it specifies information at a different, regional level.
Determining the Co-relationship
Based on the analysis, Sentence 2 provides factual information about a state bird, which is relevant to the broader topic of official birds in India mentioned in Sentence 1. It adds specific details about a regional designation, thereby offering additional information rather than contradicting or reducing the scope of the first sentence.
Similar Questions
- S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence: - S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
The second sentence: - S1: The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating.
S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence: - S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence: - S1: Bottled water is safer than tap water.
S2: In many countries tap water is fed to babies.
The second sentence: - S1: Forest cover is conducive to ecological recovery.
S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation.
The second sentence: - S1: Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries.
S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence: - S1: Field games are generally more popular than individual sports.
S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence :
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.- Select the conclusion, from among the following options, which logically follows from the given statement.
Statement:
One must work hard to be successful in life. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statement:
Doing exercises in the morning is good for health.
Conclusion 1:
Health can be maintained by doing exercises only.
Conclusion 2:
Without doing exercises, people will become ill. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and select the conclusion(s) that logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Indian Education is lacking quality due to low funds. India is allocating additional funds to education sector.
Conclusions:
I. There would be improvement in quality of education in India.
II. Only funds can improve the education standards. - In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
If A was there in XYZ cricket team, XYZ would have been the invincible team in the world.
Conclusion:
I. Without A, XYZ cannot win.
II. A is more talented than anyone else in the XYZ cricket team
