S2: In many countries tap water is fed to babies.
The second sentence:
Sentence 1 Analysis
The first sentence, S1, makes a direct claim: "Bottled water is safer than tap water." This statement implies that tap water carries certain risks or is less safe compared to bottled water.
Sentence 2 Analysis
The second sentence, S2, presents a different scenario: "In many countries tap water is fed to babies." This highlights a common practice where tap water is considered suitable for consumption, even by the most vulnerable group, infants.
Relationship Between S1 and S2
To understand the relationship, let's consider the implications:
- S1 suggests a potential safety concern with tap water.
- S2 points out that tap water is widely used for babies, implying it is considered safe enough for this sensitive population in numerous places.
The practice described in S2 (giving tap water to babies) challenges the broad assertion made in S1 that bottled water is definitively safer. If tap water is routinely given to babies in many countries, it suggests that the safety gap between bottled and tap water might not be as significant as S1 implies, or that tap water is considered safe in many contexts despite S1's claim. Therefore, S2 presents a situation that goes against or differs from the implication of S1.
Selecting the Correct Option
Based on the analysis:
- Option 1 (asserts): S2 does not support or strengthen S1.
- Option 2 (confirms): S2 does not provide evidence that confirms S1.
- Option 3 (contrasts): S2 presents a scenario that differs from and potentially challenges the implication of S1. This fits the relationship observed.
- Option 4 (extension): S2 does not add further detail or develop the idea presented in S1; it introduces a different perspective.
The second sentence highlights a common use of tap water that suggests its safety, which contrasts with the assertion in the first sentence that bottled water is inherently safer.
Similar Questions
- S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence: - S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence: - S1: The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating.
S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence: - S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
The second sentence: - S1: The peacock is India's national bird.
S2: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan.
The second sentence: - S1: Field games are generally more popular than individual sports.
S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence : - S1: Forest cover is conducive to ecological recovery.
S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation.
The second sentence: - S1: Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries.
S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence:
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All numbers are divisible by 2. All numbers are divisible by 3.
Conclusion-I All numbers are divisible by 6.
Conclusion-Il All numbers are divisible by 4.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements?
Two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All cats are dogs. All cats are black.
Conclusion-I: All dogs are black.
Conclusion-II: Some dogs are not black.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Directions for the following 2 (two) items: Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow:
S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan.
S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow: S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan. S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Directions for the following 7 (seven) items: Read the following five passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passages only.
Passage - 1 India's economic footprint, given its population, still remains small compared to the US, the European Union or China. It has much to learn from other economies, yet must implement solutions that fit its unique circumstances. India especially needs an effective long-term regulatory system based on collaboration rather than the ' current top-down approach. Regulations seek desirable outcomes yet are repeatedly used as political tools to push one agenda or another. Often, regulations fail to consider impacts on jobs and economic growth — or less restrictive alternatives. Regulations may be used to protect local markets at the expense of more widely shared prosperity in the future. Additionally, regulations inevitably result in numerous unintended consequences. In today's hyper competitive global economy, regulations need to be viewed as "weapons" that seek cost-justified social and environmental benefits while improving the economic well-being of most citizens.
Which one of the following is the most logical, rational and crucial inference that can be derived from the above passage ?
