S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence:
Understanding the Sentences
This question asks us to determine the relationship between two statements (S1 and S2) about the origin of the universe and the Big Bang theory.
- Sentence 1 (S1): This statement asserts that the origin of the universe is linked to the Big Bang event. It presents the Big Bang as the starting point.
- Sentence 2 (S2): This statement focuses on the limitations of our knowledge. It specifically states that we cannot know anything about the time *before* the Big Bang occurred.
Analyzing the Co-relationship
Let's examine how S2 relates to S1:
- Does S2 contradict S1? No. S1 states the origin is the Big Bang. S2 doesn't deny this; it only talks about what came before.
- Does S2 explain the basis behind S1? No. S2 doesn't explain *why* the Big Bang is considered the origin or provide evidence for it. It discusses the consequences or implications for knowledge, not the foundation of the theory itself.
- Does S2 confirm S1? Not directly. While S2 accepts S1 as a premise (by discussing what happened relative to it), it doesn't add evidence *for* the Big Bang itself.
- Does S2 establish limits on S1? Yes. S1 makes a statement about the universe's origin point. S2 clarifies that our understanding or knowledge is limited to events *at and after* the Big Bang, implying that the state of the universe *before* the Big Bang is unknown or unknowable based on current scientific frameworks related to the Big Bang. This sets a boundary on the scope of what we can claim to know regarding the universe's timeline, stemming from the assertion in S1.
Conclusion on Co-relationship
Sentence S2 acknowledges the Big Bang as a reference point (implied by S1) but highlights that our scientific knowledge, as currently understood within the Big Bang model, does not extend to the state of the universe prior to this event. Therefore, S2 effectively establishes limits on the assertion made in S1 by defining the boundary of our knowledge concerning the universe's timeline.
Similar Questions
- S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence: - S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating.
S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence: - S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
The second sentence: - S1: Bottled water is safer than tap water.
S2: In many countries tap water is fed to babies.
The second sentence: - S1: The peacock is India's national bird.
S2: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan.
The second sentence: - S1: Field games are generally more popular than individual sports.
S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence : - S1: Forest cover is conducive to ecological recovery.
S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation.
The second sentence: - S1: Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries.
S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence:
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All numbers are divisible by 2. All numbers are divisible by 3.
Conclusion-I All numbers are divisible by 6.
Conclusion-Il All numbers are divisible by 4.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements?
Two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All cats are dogs. All cats are black.
Conclusion-I: All dogs are black.
Conclusion-II: Some dogs are not black.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Directions for the following 2 (two) items: Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow:
S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan.
S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow: S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan. S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Directions for the following 7 (seven) items: Read the following five passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passages only.
Passage - 1 India's economic footprint, given its population, still remains small compared to the US, the European Union or China. It has much to learn from other economies, yet must implement solutions that fit its unique circumstances. India especially needs an effective long-term regulatory system based on collaboration rather than the ' current top-down approach. Regulations seek desirable outcomes yet are repeatedly used as political tools to push one agenda or another. Often, regulations fail to consider impacts on jobs and economic growth — or less restrictive alternatives. Regulations may be used to protect local markets at the expense of more widely shared prosperity in the future. Additionally, regulations inevitably result in numerous unintended consequences. In today's hyper competitive global economy, regulations need to be viewed as "weapons" that seek cost-justified social and environmental benefits while improving the economic well-being of most citizens.
Which one of the following is the most logical, rational and crucial inference that can be derived from the above passage ?
