S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence:
This question asks us to determine the relationship between two statements about Indians and their presence in other countries.
S1: "Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries."
S2: "The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world."
Now, let's examine how S2 relates to S1:
S2 explains a potential and observed result of the long-term process described in S1. It doesn't simply repeat S1, dispute it, or exist independently; it logically follows from the premise of centuries of emigration.
Based on the analysis, the second sentence (S2), highlighting the success of the Indian diaspora, is a logical consequence that stems from the historical reality described in the first sentence (S1), which points to centuries of Indian emigration across the globe.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.