S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence:
Analyzing the Sentences: Emigration and Diaspora Success
This question asks us to determine the relationship between two statements about Indians and their presence in other countries.
Understanding Sentence 1 (S1)
S1: "Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries."
- This sentence states a historical fact: people from India have been moving to other nations over a very long period, spanning many hundreds of years.
- It focuses on the act of emigration (moving out) and its long duration.
Understanding Sentence 2 (S2)
S2: "The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world."
- This sentence describes the current situation of people of Indian origin living abroad (the Indian diaspora).
- It characterizes this group as being highly successful globally.
Connecting S1 and S2: The Logical Relationship
Now, let's examine how S2 relates to S1:
- Historical Foundation (S1): The fact that Indians have been emigrating for centuries (S1) means that large communities of people of Indian origin have had time to establish themselves in various countries.
- Development Over Time: This long period allows for generations to be born abroad, build businesses, excel in professions, contribute to society, and integrate into different cultures.
- Outcome (S2): The success described in S2 ("a model of success") is a plausible outcome that can arise from sustained presence and effort over centuries, as established by the historical emigration mentioned in S1.
- Causality: While S1 doesn't guarantee success for every individual, the long-term, widespread emigration provides the necessary population base and timeframe for a significant portion of the diaspora to achieve notable success globally. Therefore, the success of the diaspora (S2) can be seen as a logical result or consequence stemming from the historical emigration (S1).
S2 explains a potential and observed result of the long-term process described in S1. It doesn't simply repeat S1, dispute it, or exist independently; it logically follows from the premise of centuries of emigration.
Conclusion on Co-relationship
Based on the analysis, the second sentence (S2), highlighting the success of the Indian diaspora, is a logical consequence that stems from the historical reality described in the first sentence (S1), which points to centuries of Indian emigration across the globe.
Similar Questions
- S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence: - S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
The second sentence: - S1: The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating.
S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence: - S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence: - S1: The peacock is India's national bird.
S2: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan.
The second sentence: - S1: Bottled water is safer than tap water.
S2: In many countries tap water is fed to babies.
The second sentence: - S1: Forest cover is conducive to ecological recovery.
S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation.
The second sentence: - S1: Field games are generally more popular than individual sports.
S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence :
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.- Select the conclusion, from among the following options, which logically follows from the given statement.
Statement:
One must work hard to be successful in life. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statement:
Doing exercises in the morning is good for health.
Conclusion 1:
Health can be maintained by doing exercises only.
Conclusion 2:
Without doing exercises, people will become ill. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and select the conclusion(s) that logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Indian Education is lacking quality due to low funds. India is allocating additional funds to education sector.
Conclusions:
I. There would be improvement in quality of education in India.
II. Only funds can improve the education standards. - In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
If A was there in XYZ cricket team, XYZ would have been the invincible team in the world.
Conclusion:
I. Without A, XYZ cannot win.
II. A is more talented than anyone else in the XYZ cricket team
