S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation.
The second sentence:
Understanding Sentence Relationships: S1 and S2 Analysis
This question requires us to analyze the connection between two statements, S1 and S2. We need to identify how the second statement (S2) relates to the first statement (S1) based on the provided options.
Statement Analysis: Forest Cover and Urbanisation Impact
Let's examine each statement individually:
- S1: Forest cover is conducive to ecological recovery. This sentence emphasizes the positive contribution of forests to the environment. It suggests that the presence of forests aids in the healing and restoration of ecological systems.
- S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation. This sentence focuses on the negative impact of rapid and unmanaged city development. It states that uncontrolled urban growth results in the deterioration of the environment.
Evaluating the Co-relationship: S2 to S1
The task is to select the option that best describes the relationship of S2 to S1. Let's consider the meaning of each option:
- correlates to the first: This implies a link or association between the two statements, suggesting they might occur together or be related in some way.
- disputes the first: This means S2 raises an objection or argument against the validity or truth of S1.
- contrasts with the first: This indicates a significant difference or opposition between the two statements.
- contradicts the first: This means S2 directly opposes S1, making it impossible for both to be true simultaneously.
Determining the Best Fit
Statement S1 highlights a beneficial aspect of forest cover for ecological recovery. In contrast, Statement S2 points out a detrimental effect of urbanisation, leading to environmental degradation.
Here's why 'contrasts' is the most appropriate choice:
- S1 presents a positive scenario for the environment (recovery).
- S2 presents a negative scenario for the environment (degradation).
These two statements describe opposing effects on the environment. While both can be factually correct independently, they represent different and opposing outcomes related to environmental health. Forest cover helps improve the environment, while unchecked urbanisation harms it. This opposition is best described as a contrast. S2 does not dispute or contradict S1 directly; it simply presents a different, opposing situation regarding environmental conditions. While there is a relationship (correlation), the term 'contrast' more accurately captures the opposing nature of the impacts described.
Therefore, the second sentence contrasts with the first.
Similar Questions
- S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence: - S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence: - S1: The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating.
S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence: - S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
The second sentence: - S1: Bottled water is safer than tap water.
S2: In many countries tap water is fed to babies.
The second sentence: - S1: The peacock is India's national bird.
S2: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan.
The second sentence: - S1: Field games are generally more popular than individual sports.
S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence : - S1: Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries.
S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence:
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All numbers are divisible by 2. All numbers are divisible by 3.
Conclusion-I All numbers are divisible by 6.
Conclusion-Il All numbers are divisible by 4.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements?
Two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All cats are dogs. All cats are black.
Conclusion-I: All dogs are black.
Conclusion-II: Some dogs are not black.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Directions for the following 2 (two) items: Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow:
S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan.
S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow: S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan. S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Directions for the following 7 (seven) items: Read the following five passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passages only.
Passage - 1 India's economic footprint, given its population, still remains small compared to the US, the European Union or China. It has much to learn from other economies, yet must implement solutions that fit its unique circumstances. India especially needs an effective long-term regulatory system based on collaboration rather than the ' current top-down approach. Regulations seek desirable outcomes yet are repeatedly used as political tools to push one agenda or another. Often, regulations fail to consider impacts on jobs and economic growth — or less restrictive alternatives. Regulations may be used to protect local markets at the expense of more widely shared prosperity in the future. Additionally, regulations inevitably result in numerous unintended consequences. In today's hyper competitive global economy, regulations need to be viewed as "weapons" that seek cost-justified social and environmental benefits while improving the economic well-being of most citizens.
Which one of the following is the most logical, rational and crucial inference that can be derived from the above passage ?
