All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Directions : In the following items a pair of sentences (S1, S2) is given. Select the most appropriate and relevant co-relationshipofthe second sentence to the first from among the options (a), (b), (c) and (d), and mark your response on the Answer Sheet accordingly.

S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence:

The correct answer is
qualifies the wisdom of the first

Understanding the S1 and S2 Sentence Relationship

The question asks us to determine the relationship between two sentences, S1 and S2, concerning the idea of failure and success.

Analyzing Sentence 1 (S1)

Sentence S1: "Failure is the stepping stone to success."

  • This is a well-known proverb.
  • It suggests that experiencing failure is a natural and necessary part of the journey towards achieving success.
  • It presents a general, positive outlook: setbacks can be learning experiences that pave the way for eventual triumph.

Analyzing Sentence 2 (S2)

Sentence S2: "Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success."

  • This sentence introduces a specific condition or limitation to the general idea presented in S1.
  • It points out that while a single instance of failure might be a "stepping stone," experiencing failure *repeatedly* (successively) might not automatically lead to success.
  • It implies that simply failing over and over might not be productive unless something changes or is learned.

Evaluating the Relationship Between S1 and S2

We need to find how S2 relates to the wisdom of S1. Let's look at the options:

  • Option 1: contradicts the wisdom of the first

    S2 does not directly negate S1. It doesn't say failure *cannot* be a stepping stone, only that *repeated* failures aren't necessarily so. Contradiction implies S1 is entirely false, which S2 doesn't claim.

  • Option 2: contrasts the wisdom of the first

    While S2 presents a different perspective than the simple optimism of S1, "contrasts" might not be the best fit. Contrast highlights differences, but S2 seems more like a refinement or limitation rather than a direct opposition.

  • Option 3: confirms the wisdom of the first

    S2 does not confirm S1. It adds a condition and questions the automatic progression from failure to success, especially in the case of repeated failures. Confirmation would mean S2 reinforces S1's message, which it doesn't.

  • Option 4: qualifies the wisdom of the first

    This option suggests that S2 adds a condition, limitation, or specific circumstance to the general statement of S1. S2 implies that the proverb in S1 holds true under certain conditions, but not universally, especially when dealing with multiple, sequential failures. It makes the original statement less absolute. This accurately describes the relationship.

Conclusion

Sentence S2 doesn't completely deny the idea that failure can lead to success (S1). Instead, it points out that the process isn't always straightforward, particularly when failures occur multiple times in a row. Therefore, S2 qualifies the wisdom of S1 by adding a nuance or condition.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions

  1. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. 
    Statements: 
    All cats are bills. 
    No snakes are bills. 
    All snakes are dolls. 
    Conclusions: 
    (I) Some dolls are not cats. 
    (II) No bills are dolls.

  2. S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
    S2: Some people are more equal than others.
    The second sentence:
  3. S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
    S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
    The second sentence:
  4. S1: The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating.
    S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
    The second sentence:
  5. S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
    S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
    The second sentence:
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App