S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence:
Understanding the S1 and S2 Sentence Relationship
The question asks us to determine the relationship between two sentences, S1 and S2, concerning the idea of failure and success.
Analyzing Sentence 1 (S1)
Sentence S1: "Failure is the stepping stone to success."
- This is a well-known proverb.
- It suggests that experiencing failure is a natural and necessary part of the journey towards achieving success.
- It presents a general, positive outlook: setbacks can be learning experiences that pave the way for eventual triumph.
Analyzing Sentence 2 (S2)
Sentence S2: "Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success."
- This sentence introduces a specific condition or limitation to the general idea presented in S1.
- It points out that while a single instance of failure might be a "stepping stone," experiencing failure *repeatedly* (successively) might not automatically lead to success.
- It implies that simply failing over and over might not be productive unless something changes or is learned.
Evaluating the Relationship Between S1 and S2
We need to find how S2 relates to the wisdom of S1. Let's look at the options:
-
Option 1: contradicts the wisdom of the first
S2 does not directly negate S1. It doesn't say failure *cannot* be a stepping stone, only that *repeated* failures aren't necessarily so. Contradiction implies S1 is entirely false, which S2 doesn't claim.
-
Option 2: contrasts the wisdom of the first
While S2 presents a different perspective than the simple optimism of S1, "contrasts" might not be the best fit. Contrast highlights differences, but S2 seems more like a refinement or limitation rather than a direct opposition.
-
Option 3: confirms the wisdom of the first
S2 does not confirm S1. It adds a condition and questions the automatic progression from failure to success, especially in the case of repeated failures. Confirmation would mean S2 reinforces S1's message, which it doesn't.
-
Option 4: qualifies the wisdom of the first
This option suggests that S2 adds a condition, limitation, or specific circumstance to the general statement of S1. S2 implies that the proverb in S1 holds true under certain conditions, but not universally, especially when dealing with multiple, sequential failures. It makes the original statement less absolute. This accurately describes the relationship.
Conclusion
Sentence S2 doesn't completely deny the idea that failure can lead to success (S1). Instead, it points out that the process isn't always straightforward, particularly when failures occur multiple times in a row. Therefore, S2 qualifies the wisdom of S1 by adding a nuance or condition.
Similar Questions
- S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence: - S1: The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating.
S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence: - S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
The second sentence: - S1: Bottled water is safer than tap water.
S2: In many countries tap water is fed to babies.
The second sentence: - S1: The peacock is India's national bird.
S2: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan.
The second sentence: - S1: Field games are generally more popular than individual sports.
S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence : - S1: Forest cover is conducive to ecological recovery.
S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation.
The second sentence: - S1: Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries.
S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence:
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All numbers are divisible by 2. All numbers are divisible by 3.
Conclusion-I All numbers are divisible by 6.
Conclusion-Il All numbers are divisible by 4.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements?
Two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All cats are dogs. All cats are black.
Conclusion-I: All dogs are black.
Conclusion-II: Some dogs are not black.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Directions for the following 2 (two) items: Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow:
S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan.
S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow: S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan. S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Directions for the following 7 (seven) items: Read the following five passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passages only.
Passage - 1 India's economic footprint, given its population, still remains small compared to the US, the European Union or China. It has much to learn from other economies, yet must implement solutions that fit its unique circumstances. India especially needs an effective long-term regulatory system based on collaboration rather than the ' current top-down approach. Regulations seek desirable outcomes yet are repeatedly used as political tools to push one agenda or another. Often, regulations fail to consider impacts on jobs and economic growth — or less restrictive alternatives. Regulations may be used to protect local markets at the expense of more widely shared prosperity in the future. Additionally, regulations inevitably result in numerous unintended consequences. In today's hyper competitive global economy, regulations need to be viewed as "weapons" that seek cost-justified social and environmental benefits while improving the economic well-being of most citizens.
Which one of the following is the most logical, rational and crucial inference that can be derived from the above passage ?
