S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence :
Analyzing the Relationship Between Sentences S1 and S2
The question asks us to determine the relationship between two sentences, S1 and S2. Let's break down each sentence and then analyze how they relate to each other.
Understanding Statement S1: General Popularity Trend
Sentence S1 states: "Field games are generally more popular than individual sports."
- This is a general statement comparing the popularity of two broad categories of sports: 'field games' and 'individual sports'.
- It suggests a trend where games played on a field (like football, hockey, cricket) tend to have a larger audience or following than sports played by individuals (like tennis, athletics, swimming).
Understanding Statement S2: Specific Sports Comparison
Sentence S2 states: "Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey."
- This is a specific comparison between two particular sports: tennis and hockey.
- It makes a claim about their relative worldwide popularity.
Analyzing the Relationship: Contradiction Identified
To see how S2 relates to S1, we need to categorize 'tennis' and 'hockey' based on the terms used in S1.
- Tennis is predominantly recognized as an individual sport (though doubles exist, the core identity is individual).
- Hockey (both field hockey and ice hockey) is typically classified as a field game or a team sport played on a field/ice.
Now, let's substitute these categories back into the statements:
- S1 suggests: Popularity(Field Games) > Popularity(Individual Sports)
- S2 states: Popularity(Tennis) > Popularity(Hockey)
- Substituting categories: Popularity(Individual Sport) > Popularity(Field Game)
The relationship derived from S2 (Popularity(Individual) > Popularity(Field Game)) is the direct opposite of the general trend stated in S1 (Popularity(Field Game) > Popularity(Individual)). Therefore, the specific example in S2 goes against the general rule presented in S1.
Conclusion on Sentence Relationship
Because the specific comparison made in S2 directly opposes the general trend mentioned in S1, the second sentence contradicts the first.
- It doesn't simply restate S1 (reiterate).
- It doesn't offer a different perspective on the same idea (contrast).
- It doesn't provide evidence supporting S1 (reinforce).
- It directly opposes the assertion made in S1.
Thus, the most appropriate relationship is that S2 contradicts S1.
Similar Questions
- S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence: - S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence: - S1: The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating.
S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence: - S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
The second sentence: - S1: Bottled water is safer than tap water.
S2: In many countries tap water is fed to babies.
The second sentence: - S1: The peacock is India's national bird.
S2: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan.
The second sentence: - S1: Forest cover is conducive to ecological recovery.
S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation.
The second sentence: - S1: Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries.
S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence:
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All numbers are divisible by 2. All numbers are divisible by 3.
Conclusion-I All numbers are divisible by 6.
Conclusion-Il All numbers are divisible by 4.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements?
Two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All cats are dogs. All cats are black.
Conclusion-I: All dogs are black.
Conclusion-II: Some dogs are not black.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Directions for the following 2 (two) items: Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow:
S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan.
S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow: S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan. S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Directions for the following 7 (seven) items: Read the following five passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passages only.
Passage - 1 India's economic footprint, given its population, still remains small compared to the US, the European Union or China. It has much to learn from other economies, yet must implement solutions that fit its unique circumstances. India especially needs an effective long-term regulatory system based on collaboration rather than the ' current top-down approach. Regulations seek desirable outcomes yet are repeatedly used as political tools to push one agenda or another. Often, regulations fail to consider impacts on jobs and economic growth — or less restrictive alternatives. Regulations may be used to protect local markets at the expense of more widely shared prosperity in the future. Additionally, regulations inevitably result in numerous unintended consequences. In today's hyper competitive global economy, regulations need to be viewed as "weapons" that seek cost-justified social and environmental benefits while improving the economic well-being of most citizens.
Which one of the following is the most logical, rational and crucial inference that can be derived from the above passage ?
