S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence :
Analyzing the Relationship Between Sentences S1 and S2
The question asks us to determine the relationship between two sentences, S1 and S2. Let's break down each sentence and then analyze how they relate to each other.
Understanding Statement S1: General Popularity Trend
Sentence S1 states: "Field games are generally more popular than individual sports."
- This is a general statement comparing the popularity of two broad categories of sports: 'field games' and 'individual sports'.
- It suggests a trend where games played on a field (like football, hockey, cricket) tend to have a larger audience or following than sports played by individuals (like tennis, athletics, swimming).
Understanding Statement S2: Specific Sports Comparison
Sentence S2 states: "Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey."
- This is a specific comparison between two particular sports: tennis and hockey.
- It makes a claim about their relative worldwide popularity.
Analyzing the Relationship: Contradiction Identified
To see how S2 relates to S1, we need to categorize 'tennis' and 'hockey' based on the terms used in S1.
- Tennis is predominantly recognized as an individual sport (though doubles exist, the core identity is individual).
- Hockey (both field hockey and ice hockey) is typically classified as a field game or a team sport played on a field/ice.
Now, let's substitute these categories back into the statements:
- S1 suggests: Popularity(Field Games) > Popularity(Individual Sports)
- S2 states: Popularity(Tennis) > Popularity(Hockey)
- Substituting categories: Popularity(Individual Sport) > Popularity(Field Game)
The relationship derived from S2 (Popularity(Individual) > Popularity(Field Game)) is the direct opposite of the general trend stated in S1 (Popularity(Field Game) > Popularity(Individual)). Therefore, the specific example in S2 goes against the general rule presented in S1.
Conclusion on Sentence Relationship
Because the specific comparison made in S2 directly opposes the general trend mentioned in S1, the second sentence contradicts the first.
- It doesn't simply restate S1 (reiterate).
- It doesn't offer a different perspective on the same idea (contrast).
- It doesn't provide evidence supporting S1 (reinforce).
- It directly opposes the assertion made in S1.
Thus, the most appropriate relationship is that S2 contradicts S1.
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.- S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence: - S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence: - S1: The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating.
S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence:
