S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence:
Analyzing Sentence Correlation: S1 and S2
This question asks us to determine the relationship between two sentences, S1 and S2. We need to understand how the idea presented in the second sentence (S2) relates to the idea in the first sentence (S1).
Understanding Sentence S1
Sentence S1 states: "The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating."
- This sentence highlights a specific observation: the clouds that are positioned highest in the sky capture our attention the most.
- The word "highest" suggests distance and being out of easy reach.
- The word "fascinating" implies a strong sense of attraction or interest.
Understanding Sentence S2
Sentence S2 states: "We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach."
- This sentence presents a general principle or axiom about human attraction.
- It suggests a direct correlation between how much we desire something and how difficult it is to attain or access. Things that are "most out of our reach" evoke the strongest "attraction."
Determining the Relationship Between S1 and S2
Now, let's see how S2 connects to S1:
- S1 describes the fascination (attraction) with the highest clouds (out of reach).
- S2 provides a general explanation for this type of fascination: attraction towards things out of reach.
- Therefore, S2 explains the underlying reason *why* the highest clouds might be fascinating, as mentioned in S1. It reinforces the idea presented in S1 by stating a broader rule that encompasses it.
Evaluating the Options
Let's look at the given options based on our analysis:
- Option 1: reiterates the axiom stated in the first - This fits perfectly. S2 states a general axiom (attraction to unreachable things) and S1 is a specific example of this axiom (fascinated by highest clouds). S2 essentially restates or reinforces the principle behind S1.
- Option 2: annuls the axiom stated in the first - Annul means to cancel or invalidate. S2 does not cancel the idea in S1; it supports it.
- Option 3: contradicts the axiom stated in the first - Contradict means to state the opposite. S2 does not oppose S1; it explains it.
- Option 4: contrasts the assertion made in the first - Contrast means to highlight differences. While S2 is more general than S1, it doesn't highlight differences; it shows a connection and underlying similarity in principle.
Conclusion
Sentence S2 provides a general principle that explains the specific observation made in Sentence S1. It reinforces the idea that distance or unattainability increases fascination. Thus, S2 reiterates the axiom presented in S1.
Similar Questions
- S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence: - S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
The second sentence: - S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence: - S1: The peacock is India's national bird.
S2: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan.
The second sentence: - S1: Bottled water is safer than tap water.
S2: In many countries tap water is fed to babies.
The second sentence: - S1: Forest cover is conducive to ecological recovery.
S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation.
The second sentence: - S1: Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries.
S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence: - S1: Field games are generally more popular than individual sports.
S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence :
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.- Select the conclusion, from among the following options, which logically follows from the given statement.
Statement:
One must work hard to be successful in life. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statement:
Doing exercises in the morning is good for health.
Conclusion 1:
Health can be maintained by doing exercises only.
Conclusion 2:
Without doing exercises, people will become ill. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and select the conclusion(s) that logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Indian Education is lacking quality due to low funds. India is allocating additional funds to education sector.
Conclusions:
I. There would be improvement in quality of education in India.
II. Only funds can improve the education standards. - In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
If A was there in XYZ cricket team, XYZ would have been the invincible team in the world.
Conclusion:
I. Without A, XYZ cannot win.
II. A is more talented than anyone else in the XYZ cricket team
