S2: We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach.
The second sentence:
Analyzing Sentence Correlation: S1 and S2
This question asks us to determine the relationship between two sentences, S1 and S2. We need to understand how the idea presented in the second sentence (S2) relates to the idea in the first sentence (S1).
Understanding Sentence S1
Sentence S1 states: "The highest clouds in the skies are the most fascinating."
- This sentence highlights a specific observation: the clouds that are positioned highest in the sky capture our attention the most.
- The word "highest" suggests distance and being out of easy reach.
- The word "fascinating" implies a strong sense of attraction or interest.
Understanding Sentence S2
Sentence S2 states: "We are most attracted to those things that are most out of our reach."
- This sentence presents a general principle or axiom about human attraction.
- It suggests a direct correlation between how much we desire something and how difficult it is to attain or access. Things that are "most out of our reach" evoke the strongest "attraction."
Determining the Relationship Between S1 and S2
Now, let's see how S2 connects to S1:
- S1 describes the fascination (attraction) with the highest clouds (out of reach).
- S2 provides a general explanation for this type of fascination: attraction towards things out of reach.
- Therefore, S2 explains the underlying reason *why* the highest clouds might be fascinating, as mentioned in S1. It reinforces the idea presented in S1 by stating a broader rule that encompasses it.
Evaluating the Options
Let's look at the given options based on our analysis:
- Option 1: reiterates the axiom stated in the first - This fits perfectly. S2 states a general axiom (attraction to unreachable things) and S1 is a specific example of this axiom (fascinated by highest clouds). S2 essentially restates or reinforces the principle behind S1.
- Option 2: annuls the axiom stated in the first - Annul means to cancel or invalidate. S2 does not cancel the idea in S1; it supports it.
- Option 3: contradicts the axiom stated in the first - Contradict means to state the opposite. S2 does not oppose S1; it explains it.
- Option 4: contrasts the assertion made in the first - Contrast means to highlight differences. While S2 is more general than S1, it doesn't highlight differences; it shows a connection and underlying similarity in principle.
Conclusion
Sentence S2 provides a general principle that explains the specific observation made in Sentence S1. It reinforces the idea that distance or unattainability increases fascination. Thus, S2 reiterates the axiom presented in S1.
Similar Questions
- S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence: - S1: All human beings are created equal in every respect.
S2: Some people are more equal than others.
The second sentence: - S1: The origin of the universe has been traced to the Big Bang.
S2: There can be no knowledge of what existed before the Big Bang.
The second sentence: - S1: A four-stroke engine is more efficient than a two-stroke engine.
S2: The two-stroke engine has been phased out to protect the environment.
The second sentence: - S1: Bottled water is safer than tap water.
S2: In many countries tap water is fed to babies.
The second sentence: - S1: The peacock is India's national bird.
S2: The Great Indian Bustard is the state bird of Rajasthan.
The second sentence: - S1: Field games are generally more popular than individual sports.
S2: Across the world tennis is more popular than hockey.
The second sentence : - S1: Forest cover is conducive to ecological recovery.
S2: Unchecked urbanisation leads to environmental degradation.
The second sentence: - S1: Indians have been emigrating to countries across the world for centuries.
S2: The Indian diaspora is a model of success across the world.
The second sentence:
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All numbers are divisible by 2. All numbers are divisible by 3.
Conclusion-I All numbers are divisible by 6.
Conclusion-Il All numbers are divisible by 4.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements?
Two Statements are given followed by two Conclusions:
Statements: All cats are dogs. All cats are black.
Conclusion-I: All dogs are black.
Conclusion-II: Some dogs are not black.
Which of the above Conclusions logically follows/follow from the two given Statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Directions for the following 2 (two) items: Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow:
S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan.
S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Read the following statements SI and S2 and answer the two items that follow: S1: Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan. S2: Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Directions for the following 7 (seven) items: Read the following five passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passages only.
Passage - 1 India's economic footprint, given its population, still remains small compared to the US, the European Union or China. It has much to learn from other economies, yet must implement solutions that fit its unique circumstances. India especially needs an effective long-term regulatory system based on collaboration rather than the ' current top-down approach. Regulations seek desirable outcomes yet are repeatedly used as political tools to push one agenda or another. Often, regulations fail to consider impacts on jobs and economic growth — or less restrictive alternatives. Regulations may be used to protect local markets at the expense of more widely shared prosperity in the future. Additionally, regulations inevitably result in numerous unintended consequences. In today's hyper competitive global economy, regulations need to be viewed as "weapons" that seek cost-justified social and environmental benefits while improving the economic well-being of most citizens.
Which one of the following is the most logical, rational and crucial inference that can be derived from the above passage ?
