Mandamus is a judicial remedy given by a court in the form of an order to any government, subordinate court, corporation, or public authority. Mandamus is one of the important writ granted by the Indian Constitution. The purpose of the mandamus is to keep public authorities within their jurisdiction while performing public functions. Mandamus is not issued when the government has no legal obligation to do so. This article explains the Mandamus which is important for UPSC Indian Polity Preparation.

Meaning of Mandamus

• Mandamus is a court-issued directive to a public official, requesting that he must perform his official duties which he failed to perform or refused to do so.
• It can also be used against any public figure, corporation, lower court, tribunal, or government for the purpose of the same goal.
• It literally translates to 'we command.'
• A writ of mandamus cannot be issued when:
  • Against a private individual or group;
  • To enforce departmental policy that does not have statutory force;
  • When the duty is discretionary and not mandatory;
  • To compel the execution of a contractual obligation;
  • It cannot be issued against the President of India, State Governors and against Chief Justice of the High Court acting in a judicial capacity.
• Example: When the respondent did not obey the orders of the tribunal, the petitioner approached the Supreme Court for the enforcement of the orders of the tribunal. The Supreme Court issued a Mandamus ordering the respondent to abide by the orders of the tribunal.

Origin of Mandamus

• The writ of mandamus may be traced back to England, where the King, as the authoritarian autocrat of the administrative system, used to issue a mandamus to his people compelling them to do the public duty demanded of them several times throughout the day.
• Since its inception, the writ has been used to force the execution of a broad variety of public and quasi-public tasks that have been unlawfully rejected.
• Public responsibilities forced as a result of invoking mandamus include, among other things, the restoration of offices, the conduct of elections, and the avoidance of the dissolution of local municipal organisations and authorities.
• With the creation of the Supreme Court of Calcutta in 1773, the British introduced the Writ of Mandamus in India.
• Later, in 1877, the Letters Patent Act's writ of mandamus was superseded by an order under the then-new Specific Relief Act, which required a competent authorised authority to complete or stop from completing a specific action within the "local confines of its customary civil jurisdiction."

Constitutional Provisions

• Under Article 32, the Supreme Court and the high courts can issue writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, and quo-warranto.
• Since the Supreme Court is the highest court in India, it has the authority to issue Writs of Mandamus even against the High Court, despite the fact that the High Courts have the authority to issue such Writs under Article 226.
• As a result, a High Court can only issue Mandamus Writ under Article 226 to Inferior Courts, such as a district trial court.
• The Supreme Court bench ruled that by issuing a Writ of Mandamus, the Court cannot mandate the creation of a tribunal.
• According to Articles 245 and 246 of the Indian Constitution, the Court cannot instruct a state legislature to pass a legislation on any subject.
• The ruling further held that such a petition could not be heard, and the petition was thus rejected.

Mandamus - Conditions for the issuance

The following conditions must be met before a writ of Mandamus may be issued:

• The person or authority requested to issue the writ must have some public responsibility to execute, which he has failed to do.
• Such public responsibility must be imperative or required in nature, rather than discretionary, and its fulfilment must fail.
• The petitioner should have the legal right to compel the authority or person against whom he seeks the writ of Mandamus to issue the writ.
• When the petitioner requested that the authority perform its public duty, it refused.

Purpose of Mandamus

• The court will issue a writ of Mandamus to stop the public official or the government from acting against the aggrieved individual in order to enforce basic rights.
• A High Court, but not the Supreme Court, can issue a writ of Mandamus for additional reasons. They are as follows:
  • To prevent a public officer or the government from executing an invalid statute.
  • To force a court or tribunal to exercise its authority when it has refused.
  • To compel any individual to undertake a constitutional or statutory public responsibility.
  • When an official abuses his discretionary powers by exercising his public authority in an excessive, illegal, or malevolent manner, or by not applying his thought to it.

Limitations of Mandamus

Certain individuals are immune from the writ of Mandamus. The following are the restrictions on the use of Mandamus:

• In the case of Venkataramana vs State of Madras 1951 judgement, a writ of Mandamus cannot be issued against the President or state governors.
• It will not be granted against private people or businesses who have no public obligation to fulfil.
• It cannot be issued against a legislature, mandating or prohibiting legislation from being enacted.
• To guarantee the smooth running and conduct of parliamentary proceedings, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued against any Member of Parliament, i.e. the MP of Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha or Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) of any state.
• Mandamus cannot be granted against any legislative body that passes legislation that infringes the fundamental rights provided by Part III of the Constitution.
• This was later confirmed by the Supreme Court in Chotey Lal v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

Significance

• A writ of mandamus is a judicial remedy in the form of an order from a superior court to do or not do some specific actions that the government body, court, corporation, or public authority is bound to perform or not perform under law, depending on the circumstances.
• These acts must be carried out as part of their public or statutory duties.
• It cannot be refused solely on the basis of the availability of an alternative remedy.
• The Supreme Court may issue a mandamus to enforce a person's fundamental right when it is alleged that it has been violated by some governmental order or act.
• This writ may be issued by the High Courts:
  • to direct an officer to exercise his constitutional and legal powers,
  • to compel any person to discharge duties imposed by the constitution or statute,
  • to compel a judicial authority to exercise its jurisdiction, and
  • to order the government not to enforce an unconstitutional law.
• One of the most important aspects of the Writ of Mandamus is that it cannot be issued against a private person;
  • Only the State or people holding any office that falls under the category of a public office can be compelled to do or refrain from doing an act.
• Any person seeking a writ of mandamus must demonstrate that he has a legal right to overpower the opponent against whom the writ will be issued, in order to do or not do some specific act.
• One of the essential requirements for the issuance of a writ of mandamus is that the person seeking relief has made a demand, which has been denied by the relevant authority.
• This writ is the most widely read in India.
• When there is no specific legal remedy available to any person for the protection of their rights provided by law and the court is satisfied that the administrative authorities have not acted in accordance with the law, the writ may be issued.

Important judgements

Unni Krishnan vs Union of India

• The court ruled that a private medical/engineering college falls under the writ jurisdiction of the court, regardless of its aid or affiliation.

Jatinder Kumar vs. the State of Punjab

• The court held that Article 320(3) of the constitution, which stated that before a government servant was dismissed, the UPSC should be consulted, did not confer any right on a public servant, and thus failure to consult the public service commission did not entitle the public servant to seek mandamus to compel the government to consult the commission.
• However, if the authority is required by law to exercise a dissection, Mandamus would like to do so in one way or another.

Bombay Municipality vs. Advance Builders

• The court ordered the municipality to put into effect a planning scheme that it had prepared and was approved by the government under the relevant statute but on which no action had been taken for a long time.

SP Gupta v. Union of India (1981)

• In the landmark case, the court declared that the president of India cannot be served with a writ directing him to determine the number of High Court judges and fill vacancies.
• The courts cannot issue writs of Mandamus against individuals such as the president and governors.

C.G. Govindan v. the State of Gujarat (1991)

• The Court refused to issue a writ of Mandamus against the governor in the matter of to approve the remuneration of court workers determined by the Chief Justice of High Court under Article 229.
• A writ of Mandamus cannot be issued against a governor, it was determined.

Conclusion

The issuance of a writ of mandamus underscores the judiciary's role in ensuring accountability and adherence to the rule of law. By mandating the performance of a duty, this remedy upholds the principles of justice and fairness, ensuring that legal obligations are met and public rights are protected. It serves as a vital check on administrative and governmental actions, reinforcing the importance of lawful and efficient governance.

FAQs 

Q1: What is Mandamus in Indian Polity?

Q2: Who can issue the writ of Mandamus in India?

Q3: What are the conditions for issuing a Mandamus?

Q4: Can Mandamus be issued to private individuals or bodies?

Q5: What is the significance of Mandamus in the context of Indian democracy?

MCQs

1. Which of the following is the primary function of the writ of Mandamus?

A) To order a lower court to re-evaluate its decision

B) To compel a public authority to perform a legal duty

C) To release a person from detention

D) To prevent the imposition of taxes

2. Under which articles of the Indian Constitution can the writ of Mandamus be issued?

A) Article 32 and Article 226

B) Article 21 and Article 32

C) Article 34 and Article 44

D) Article 14 and Article 32

3. Which of the following is NOT a condition for issuing the writ of Mandamus?

A) The public authority must have failed to perform its legal duty

B) The petitioner must have a direct and specific interest

C) The person against whom Mandamus is issued must be a private individual

D) There must be a clear legal duty owed to the petitioner

4. Which court has the authority to issue the writ of Mandamus?

A) Only the Supreme Court

B) Only the High Courts

C) Both the Supreme Court and the High Courts

D) District Courts

5. What happens if a writ of Mandamus is violated?

A) The public authority is fined

B) The person can be imprisoned

C) The action of the public authority is revoked

D) The person may be held in contempt of court

GS Mains Questions with Model Answers

Q1: Examine the role of writs in the Indian legal system, particularly focusing on Mandamus.

Answer: Writs in India, including Mandamus, play a crucial role in safeguarding fundamental rights and ensuring the proper functioning of public authorities. The writ of Mandamus, specifically, is a powerful tool for enforcing legal duties that are owed by public authorities to individuals or groups. It empowers the judiciary to direct public officials to perform their duties, especially when they fail to do so. Mandamus is essential in maintaining the rule of law and ensuring that the government acts within the legal framework set by the Constitution. This writ reflects the judicial commitment to protect citizens' rights against inaction or wrongful actions of government bodies. It also reflects the principle of accountability, wherein public authorities are compelled to perform their responsibilities, promoting transparency and justice in governance. While it cannot be issued to private entities, Mandamus ensures that public welfare is prioritized and legal duties are carried out effectively.

Q2: Discuss the significance of the writ of Mandamus in the context of protecting citizens’ rights in India.

Answer: The writ of Mandamus is crucial in protecting citizens' rights, particularly by ensuring that public authorities perform their duties. When governmental or public bodies fail to perform legally prescribed duties, individuals can approach the courts to enforce their rights. For example, if a government official fails to issue a permit or take action required under the law, Mandamus can compel them to do so. This writ is integral to upholding justice by preventing delays or denial of citizens' rights due to negligence or deliberate omission by public officials. It serves as a corrective mechanism, maintaining the balance of power between citizens and the state. In the Indian context, the judiciary's ability to issue Mandamus reflects the country’s commitment to the rule of law and constitutional values. This ensures that the government acts responsibly, making Mandamus a cornerstone of democratic governance.

Q3: Evaluate the limitations of the writ of Mandamus in the Indian context.

Answer: While Mandamus is a powerful tool for ensuring the performance of legal duties, it has certain limitations. First, it can only be issued against public authorities or officials who have failed to perform a public duty. It cannot compel private individuals or organizations to act unless they are performing public functions. Second, Mandamus is not applicable if the duty in question is discretionary, as courts do not have the authority to direct how discretion should be exercised. Additionally, the writ cannot be used to challenge the merits of decisions made by public authorities, but rather, it only addresses non-performance of statutory duties. Despite these limitations, Mandamus remains an important judicial tool for ensuring that public authorities fulfill their legal obligations and that citizens' rights are protected from inaction or delay.

Previous Year Questions on  Mandamus

1. UPSC 2022 Prelims

Question: Under which circumstances can the writ of Mandamus be issued?

A) Only when a public authority has acted beyond its jurisdiction

B) When there is a specific legal duty owed to the petitioner

C) To issue an order to a private individual

D) To appeal against a court decision

Answer: B) When there is a specific legal duty owed to the petitioner

Explanation: Mandamus can be issued only when a public authority has a clear, specific, and legal duty to perform, and they have failed to do so. The petitioner must have a direct and specific interest in the matter. This writ ensures that public authorities act within the scope of their legal powers.

2. UPSC 2020 Mains

Question: Discuss the significance of Mandamus in ensuring judicial accountability in India.

Answer: The writ of Mandamus is integral in ensuring judicial accountability in India. This writ is issued to compel public authorities to perform their duties when they fail to do so, thereby enforcing accountability within the government and administrative bodies. The judiciary, through Mandamus, ensures that public officials act within their legal bounds and fulfill their statutory obligations. The power of judicial review, granted by the writ of Mandamus, reflects the supremacy of law over arbitrary power, making the administration answerable to the rule of law. Furthermore, it serves as a deterrent against neglect and ensures that citizens’ rights are not infringed upon due to inaction by public authorities. The writ’s ability to uphold legal duties reinforces the effectiveness of the judicial system in holding the government accountable to the public, contributing to a more transparent and responsible governance system.

*email: contactus@prepp.in