The statements given below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Without resolving anything yourself, choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement. Statements: Most of the advocates are hard working. Manoj is advocate. Conclusion I: Manoj is politician.
Only conclusion II follows
Analyzing Logic Statements and Conclusions
The question asks us to evaluate two conclusions based on two given statements and determine which conclusion(s) logically follow without adding any outside information or assumptions.
Understanding the Statements
- Statement 1: Most of the advocates are hard working.
- Statement 2: Manoj is advocate.
Let's break down what these statements mean. Statement 1 tells us about the group of advocates. The word "Most" is important. It implies that a large proportion, but not necessarily all, advocates are hard working. Statement 2 tells us that Manoj belongs to the group of advocates.
Evaluating Conclusion I: Manoj is politician
This conclusion introduces the term "politician". Looking at the given statements, there is absolutely no mention of politicians or any connection between advocates and politicians. We cannot infer anything about Manoj's profession other than that he is an advocate, based solely on these statements. Therefore, this conclusion does not logically follow from the given statements.
Evaluating Conclusion II: Some advocates do not work hard
Let's re-examine Statement 1: "Most of the advocates are hard working." The word "Most" means more than half. If most advocates are hard working, it necessarily implies that the remaining portion of advocates are not hard working. If the statement said "All advocates are hard working", then this conclusion would not follow. But since it says "Most", it allows for, and indeed implies, the existence of some advocates who are not hard working. Therefore, the conclusion "Some advocates do not work hard" logically follows from the statement "Most of the advocates are hard working."
Determining Which Conclusion(s) Follow
Based on our analysis:
- Conclusion I: "Manoj is politician" — Does not follow.
- Conclusion II: "Some advocates do not work hard" — Does follow.
Thus, only Conclusion II logically follows from the given statements.
Summary of Logic Flow
| Statement(s) | Conclusion | Logically Follows? | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Most advocates are hard working. | Some advocates do not work hard. | Yes | "Most" implies "not all". If not all are hard working, then some are not. |
| Most advocates are hard working. Manoj is advocate. |
Manoj is politician. | No | No information links advocates or Manoj to being a politician. |
Final Answer Analysis
We found that only Conclusion II logically follows from the statements. We should choose the option that states this.
Revision Table: Logic Reasoning Concepts
| Term | Explanation | Example based on Question |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | A premise or assertion given as true. | "Most of the advocates are hard working." |
| Conclusion | A judgement or decision reached by reasoning. | "Some advocates do not work hard." |
| Logically Follows | When a conclusion must be true if the given statements are true. | Conclusion II logically follows from Statement 1. |
| Quantifiers (Most, Some, All, No) | Words indicating the quantity of a group being discussed. | "Most" indicates a majority, not necessarily all. "Some" indicates at least one, but not necessarily all. |
Additional Information: Syllogism and Logic
This type of question is related to logical reasoning, specifically focusing on drawing conclusions from given premises. It involves understanding quantifiers like "most", "some", and "all". In formal logic, these concepts are studied in detail, often using tools like Venn diagrams or symbolic logic to represent relationships between sets.
The statement "Most of the advocates are hard working" is a form of a particular affirmative statement, but with the quantifier "most" which is weaker than "all". It guarantees the existence of advocates who are hard working and implies the existence of those who are not hard working.
Statement 2, "Manoj is advocate," is a singular statement placing an individual within a category. However, it doesn't help in determining whether Manoj is hard working or not based on the "most" statement, as he could be one of the hard working advocates or one of the not-hard working advocates. More importantly, it provides no link to any other category like "politician".
Similar Questions
The statement below is followed by two decisions labeled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the two suggested decisions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement:
The councilor of the area proposed to install CCTV camera in the locality to avoid crimes and to catch criminals.
Decisions:
I: Residents should welcome this proposal.
II: This is useless proposal: resident should oppose it.The statement below is followed by two conclusion labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health.
Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
Conclusion II: Milk is harmful for child.The statement below is followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
All organised person find time for entertainment. Mahesh in spite his busy schedule, find time for entertainment.
Conclusion:
I. Mahesh is organized person.
II. Mahesh is an actor.- Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
Conclusions:
I. Social media is more effective than print media for advertising.
II. Print media is obsolete. - Statement: Innovation requires risk-taking, but excessive risks without planning can lead to failure.
Conclusion I: Risk-taking alone does not guarantee innovation.
Conclusion II: Planning is always necessary for successful innovation.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are plants.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are plants.
II. All flowers are plants. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "People who regularly exercise are less likely to fall ill."
Conclusions:
I. Regular exercise improves immunity.
II. Illness is directly linked to lack of physical activity. - Statement: Emotional intelligence enhances leadership, but without technical expertise, leaders may fail to meet organizational objectives. Conclusion I: Emotional intelligence alone is not enough for leadership success.
Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
Conclusions:
I. Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
II. All students will become computer experts.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All A are B.
II. Some B are C.
Conclusions:
I. Some A are C.
II. Some A are not C.
III. Some A are B.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
A asked C, "What time is it now?" Is it half past two? ''
Conclusions:
1. A wants to go to lunch.
2. A wants to confirm what the time is because his watch is off.
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie.
Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie.
Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1 : All schools are books.
Statement 2 : No books are papers.
Conclusion I : No schools are books.
Conclusion II : Some books are schools.
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be different from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some P are Q.
II. All P are N.
Conclusion:
I. All Q are N.
II. Some P are not Q.
