Conclusion I: Risk-taking alone does not guarantee innovation.
Conclusion II: Planning is always necessary for successful innovation.
Which conclusion follows?
This question asks us to evaluate two conclusions based on a given statement about innovation, risk-taking, and planning.
Analyzing the Statement and Conclusions
The core statement is: "Innovation requires risk-taking, but excessive risks without planning can lead to failure."
Let's break down each conclusion:
Evaluating Conclusion I: Risk-taking Alone Does Not Guarantee Innovation
This conclusion suggests that simply taking risks isn't enough to achieve innovation. The original statement supports this because:
- It states innovation requires risk-taking, implying it's a necessary component but not the only one.
- It also mentions that taking excessive risks without planning can lead to failure. This implies that the nature of the risk and the presence of planning are important factors, not just the act of risk-taking itself. If risk-taking alone was a guarantee, then excessive risk without planning wouldn't necessarily lead to failure.
Therefore, Conclusion I logically follows from the statement.
Evaluating Conclusion II: Planning is Always Necessary for Successful Innovation
This conclusion makes a strong claim that planning is always needed for successful innovation. Let's consider the statement:
- The statement highlights that excessive risks *without planning* can lead to failure. This emphasizes the importance of planning, especially when risks are high, to ensure success.
- However, the statement does not say that planning is necessary in *every* situation or for *all* levels of innovation. The word "always" makes this a very broad assertion. It's possible that some innovations might involve moderate risks where formal planning isn't strictly required, or the planning is implicit rather than explicit.
- The statement focuses on a specific scenario (excessive risk without planning leading to failure) and doesn't provide a universal rule for all innovation scenarios.
Because the statement doesn't explicitly state or necessarily imply that planning is required in *all* cases of innovation, Conclusion II does not strictly follow.
Final Determination
Based on the analysis, only Conclusion I is directly and logically supported by the provided statement. Conclusion II makes a broader claim ("always necessary") than what can be inferred from the specific conditions mentioned in the statement.
Thus, the correct determination is that only Conclusion I follows.
Similar Questions
The statements given below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Without resolving anything yourself, choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Most of the advocates are hard working.
Manoj is advocate.
Conclusion I: Manoj is politician.
Conclusion II: Some advocates do not work hard.The statement below is followed by two decisions labeled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the two suggested decisions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement:
The councilor of the area proposed to install CCTV camera in the locality to avoid crimes and to catch criminals.
Decisions:
I: Residents should welcome this proposal.
II: This is useless proposal: resident should oppose it.The statement below is followed by two conclusion labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health.
Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
Conclusion II: Milk is harmful for child.The statement below is followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
All organised person find time for entertainment. Mahesh in spite his busy schedule, find time for entertainment.
Conclusion:
I. Mahesh is organized person.
II. Mahesh is an actor.- Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
Conclusions:
I. Social media is more effective than print media for advertising.
II. Print media is obsolete. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are plants.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are plants.
II. All flowers are plants. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "People who regularly exercise are less likely to fall ill."
Conclusions:
I. Regular exercise improves immunity.
II. Illness is directly linked to lack of physical activity. - Statement: Emotional intelligence enhances leadership, but without technical expertise, leaders may fail to meet organizational objectives. Conclusion I: Emotional intelligence alone is not enough for leadership success.
Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
Conclusions:
I. Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
II. All students will become computer experts.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All A are B.
II. Some B are C.
Conclusions:
I. Some A are C.
II. Some A are not C.
III. Some A are B.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
A asked C, "What time is it now?" Is it half past two? ''
Conclusions:
1. A wants to go to lunch.
2. A wants to confirm what the time is because his watch is off.
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie.
Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie.
Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1 : All schools are books.
Statement 2 : No books are papers.
Conclusion I : No schools are books.
Conclusion II : Some books are schools.
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be different from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some P are Q.
II. All P are N.
Conclusion:
I. All Q are N.
II. Some P are not Q.
