Conclusion I: Risk-taking alone does not guarantee innovation.
Conclusion II: Planning is always necessary for successful innovation.
Which conclusion follows?
This question asks us to evaluate two conclusions based on a given statement about innovation, risk-taking, and planning.
Analyzing the Statement and Conclusions
The core statement is: "Innovation requires risk-taking, but excessive risks without planning can lead to failure."
Let's break down each conclusion:
Evaluating Conclusion I: Risk-taking Alone Does Not Guarantee Innovation
This conclusion suggests that simply taking risks isn't enough to achieve innovation. The original statement supports this because:
- It states innovation requires risk-taking, implying it's a necessary component but not the only one.
- It also mentions that taking excessive risks without planning can lead to failure. This implies that the nature of the risk and the presence of planning are important factors, not just the act of risk-taking itself. If risk-taking alone was a guarantee, then excessive risk without planning wouldn't necessarily lead to failure.
Therefore, Conclusion I logically follows from the statement.
Evaluating Conclusion II: Planning is Always Necessary for Successful Innovation
This conclusion makes a strong claim that planning is always needed for successful innovation. Let's consider the statement:
- The statement highlights that excessive risks *without planning* can lead to failure. This emphasizes the importance of planning, especially when risks are high, to ensure success.
- However, the statement does not say that planning is necessary in *every* situation or for *all* levels of innovation. The word "always" makes this a very broad assertion. It's possible that some innovations might involve moderate risks where formal planning isn't strictly required, or the planning is implicit rather than explicit.
- The statement focuses on a specific scenario (excessive risk without planning leading to failure) and doesn't provide a universal rule for all innovation scenarios.
Because the statement doesn't explicitly state or necessarily imply that planning is required in *all* cases of innovation, Conclusion II does not strictly follow.
Final Determination
Based on the analysis, only Conclusion I is directly and logically supported by the provided statement. Conclusion II makes a broader claim ("always necessary") than what can be inferred from the specific conditions mentioned in the statement.
Thus, the correct determination is that only Conclusion I follows.
Similar Questions
The statements given below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Without resolving anything yourself, choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Most of the advocates are hard working.
Manoj is advocate.
Conclusion I: Manoj is politician.
Conclusion II: Some advocates do not work hard.The statement below is followed by two conclusion labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health.
Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
Conclusion II: Milk is harmful for child.The statement below is followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
All organised person find time for entertainment. Mahesh in spite his busy schedule, find time for entertainment.
Conclusion:
I. Mahesh is organized person.
II. Mahesh is an actor.- Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
Conclusions:
I. Social media is more effective than print media for advertising.
II. Print media is obsolete. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are plants.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are plants.
II. All flowers are plants. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "People who regularly exercise are less likely to fall ill."
Conclusions:
I. Regular exercise improves immunity.
II. Illness is directly linked to lack of physical activity. - Statement: Emotional intelligence enhances leadership, but without technical expertise, leaders may fail to meet organizational objectives. Conclusion I: Emotional intelligence alone is not enough for leadership success.
Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
Conclusions:
I. Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
II. All students will become computer experts.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.
Study the given statement and the conclusions carefully and decide which of the following conclusions follow(s) the given statement logically.
Statement:
The British introduced the postal system in India in 1764.
Conclusions:
I. Postal letters often are late, or they are lost.
II. Postmen get less salary, so they tend to do mistakes.
