Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
Conclusions:
I. Social media is more effective than print media for advertising.
II. Print media is obsolete.
Analyzing the Statement on Advertising Reach
The core of the problem lies in understanding the relationship between the given statement and the proposed conclusions.
Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
This statement makes a specific comparison based solely on the metric of reach. It claims social media platforms connect with a larger audience compared to traditional print media.
Evaluating Conclusion I
Conclusion I: "Social media is more effective than print media for advertising."
- The statement highlights that social media has a greater reach.
- Reach refers to the total number of unique people exposed to an advertisement.
- While effectiveness can depend on various factors (like engagement, conversion rates, cost, audience targeting precision, etc.), greater reach is often a primary driver of effectiveness. A larger audience potentially means more customers or greater brand awareness.
- Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that having more reach suggests social media could be more effective for advertising than print media, at least in terms of audience size. This conclusion logically follows from the premise of greater reach.
Evaluating Conclusion II
Conclusion II: "Print media is obsolete."
- The statement says social media has more reach, not that print media has *no* reach or is completely unusable.
- "Obsolete" means outdated and no longer useful.
- The statement does not provide enough information to conclude that print media is obsolete. Print media might still be valuable for reaching specific demographics or achieving certain advertising goals, even if its overall reach is less than social media's.
- Concluding that print media is obsolete based solely on the fact that social media has a larger reach is an exaggeration and an unsupported leap in logic.
Final Determination
Based on the analysis:
- Conclusion I is a plausible inference derived from the statement about comparative reach.
- Conclusion II is an unsupported overstatement and does not logically follow from the statement.
Therefore, only Conclusion I follows from the given statement.
Similar Questions
The statements given below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Without resolving anything yourself, choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Most of the advocates are hard working.
Manoj is advocate.
Conclusion I: Manoj is politician.
Conclusion II: Some advocates do not work hard.The statement below is followed by two conclusion labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health.
Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
Conclusion II: Milk is harmful for child.The statement below is followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
All organised person find time for entertainment. Mahesh in spite his busy schedule, find time for entertainment.
Conclusion:
I. Mahesh is organized person.
II. Mahesh is an actor.- Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are plants.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are plants.
II. All flowers are plants. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "People who regularly exercise are less likely to fall ill."
Conclusions:
I. Regular exercise improves immunity.
II. Illness is directly linked to lack of physical activity. - Statement: Emotional intelligence enhances leadership, but without technical expertise, leaders may fail to meet organizational objectives. Conclusion I: Emotional intelligence alone is not enough for leadership success.
Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
Conclusions:
I. Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
II. All students will become computer experts. - Statement: Innovation requires risk-taking, but excessive risks without planning can lead to failure.
Conclusion I: Risk-taking alone does not guarantee innovation.
Conclusion II: Planning is always necessary for successful innovation.
Which conclusion follows?
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.
Study the given statement and the conclusions carefully and decide which of the following conclusions follow(s) the given statement logically.
Statement:
The British introduced the postal system in India in 1764.
Conclusions:
I. Postal letters often are late, or they are lost.
II. Postmen get less salary, so they tend to do mistakes.
