Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Which conclusion follows?
Statement Analysis: Leadership Requirements
The question presents a statement about the essential components of effective leadership:
- Emotional intelligence (EI) is acknowledged as a beneficial trait that enhances leadership capabilities.
- However, the statement crucially adds a condition: without technical expertise, leaders might struggle to achieve the organization's goals.
This implies that while EI is valuable, it's not the sole determinant of success, and a lack of technical skills can lead to failure in meeting objectives.
Conclusion I Evaluation: Sufficiency of Emotional Intelligence
Conclusion I: Emotional intelligence alone is not enough for leadership success.
Analysis: The original statement explicitly mentions that leaders may fail to meet organizational objectives without technical expertise, even if they possess emotional intelligence. This directly supports the idea that EI by itself is insufficient for complete leadership success, especially when it comes to achieving practical, objective-driven outcomes. Therefore, Conclusion I logically follows from the statement.
Conclusion II Evaluation: Role of Technical Expertise
Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Analysis: The statement indicates that technical expertise is necessary to meet organizational objectives. However, it does not claim that technical expertise *alone guarantees* or *ensures* effective leadership. Effective leadership typically involves a combination of skills, including interpersonal, strategic, and potentially other competencies beyond just technical know-how. The statement highlights the *necessity* of technical expertise for objectives but stops short of saying it's a guarantee of overall *effectiveness*. Emotional intelligence is also mentioned as enhancing leadership. Thus, Conclusion II makes a stronger claim than what the statement supports.
Final Determination
Based on the analysis:
- Conclusion I is supported by the statement.
- Conclusion II is not fully supported by the statement, as it overstates the role of technical expertise.
Therefore, only Conclusion I logically follows.
Similar Questions
The statements given below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Without resolving anything yourself, choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Most of the advocates are hard working.
Manoj is advocate.
Conclusion I: Manoj is politician.
Conclusion II: Some advocates do not work hard.The statement below is followed by two decisions labeled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the two suggested decisions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement:
The councilor of the area proposed to install CCTV camera in the locality to avoid crimes and to catch criminals.
Decisions:
I: Residents should welcome this proposal.
II: This is useless proposal: resident should oppose it.The statement below is followed by two conclusion labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health.
Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
Conclusion II: Milk is harmful for child.The statement below is followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
All organised person find time for entertainment. Mahesh in spite his busy schedule, find time for entertainment.
Conclusion:
I. Mahesh is organized person.
II. Mahesh is an actor.- Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
Conclusions:
I. Social media is more effective than print media for advertising.
II. Print media is obsolete. - Statement: Innovation requires risk-taking, but excessive risks without planning can lead to failure.
Conclusion I: Risk-taking alone does not guarantee innovation.
Conclusion II: Planning is always necessary for successful innovation.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are plants.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are plants.
II. All flowers are plants. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "People who regularly exercise are less likely to fall ill."
Conclusions:
I. Regular exercise improves immunity.
II. Illness is directly linked to lack of physical activity. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
Conclusions:
I. Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
II. All students will become computer experts.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All A are B.
II. Some B are C.
Conclusions:
I. Some A are C.
II. Some A are not C.
III. Some A are B.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
A asked C, "What time is it now?" Is it half past two? ''
Conclusions:
1. A wants to go to lunch.
2. A wants to confirm what the time is because his watch is off.
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie.
Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie.
Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1 : All schools are books.
Statement 2 : No books are papers.
Conclusion I : No schools are books.
Conclusion II : Some books are schools.
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be different from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some P are Q.
II. All P are N.
Conclusion:
I. All Q are N.
II. Some P are not Q.
