Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Which conclusion follows?
Statement Analysis: Leadership Requirements
The question presents a statement about the essential components of effective leadership:
- Emotional intelligence (EI) is acknowledged as a beneficial trait that enhances leadership capabilities.
- However, the statement crucially adds a condition: without technical expertise, leaders might struggle to achieve the organization's goals.
This implies that while EI is valuable, it's not the sole determinant of success, and a lack of technical skills can lead to failure in meeting objectives.
Conclusion I Evaluation: Sufficiency of Emotional Intelligence
Conclusion I: Emotional intelligence alone is not enough for leadership success.
Analysis: The original statement explicitly mentions that leaders may fail to meet organizational objectives without technical expertise, even if they possess emotional intelligence. This directly supports the idea that EI by itself is insufficient for complete leadership success, especially when it comes to achieving practical, objective-driven outcomes. Therefore, Conclusion I logically follows from the statement.
Conclusion II Evaluation: Role of Technical Expertise
Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Analysis: The statement indicates that technical expertise is necessary to meet organizational objectives. However, it does not claim that technical expertise *alone guarantees* or *ensures* effective leadership. Effective leadership typically involves a combination of skills, including interpersonal, strategic, and potentially other competencies beyond just technical know-how. The statement highlights the *necessity* of technical expertise for objectives but stops short of saying it's a guarantee of overall *effectiveness*. Emotional intelligence is also mentioned as enhancing leadership. Thus, Conclusion II makes a stronger claim than what the statement supports.
Final Determination
Based on the analysis:
- Conclusion I is supported by the statement.
- Conclusion II is not fully supported by the statement, as it overstates the role of technical expertise.
Therefore, only Conclusion I logically follows.
Similar Questions
The statements given below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Without resolving anything yourself, choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Most of the advocates are hard working.
Manoj is advocate.
Conclusion I: Manoj is politician.
Conclusion II: Some advocates do not work hard.The statement below is followed by two conclusion labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health.
Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
Conclusion II: Milk is harmful for child.The statement below is followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
All organised person find time for entertainment. Mahesh in spite his busy schedule, find time for entertainment.
Conclusion:
I. Mahesh is organized person.
II. Mahesh is an actor.- Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
Conclusions:
I. Social media is more effective than print media for advertising.
II. Print media is obsolete. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are plants.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are plants.
II. All flowers are plants. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "People who regularly exercise are less likely to fall ill."
Conclusions:
I. Regular exercise improves immunity.
II. Illness is directly linked to lack of physical activity. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
Conclusions:
I. Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
II. All students will become computer experts. - Statement: Innovation requires risk-taking, but excessive risks without planning can lead to failure.
Conclusion I: Risk-taking alone does not guarantee innovation.
Conclusion II: Planning is always necessary for successful innovation.
Which conclusion follows?
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.
Study the given statement and the conclusions carefully and decide which of the following conclusions follow(s) the given statement logically.
Statement:
The British introduced the postal system in India in 1764.
Conclusions:
I. Postal letters often are late, or they are lost.
II. Postmen get less salary, so they tend to do mistakes.
