In this question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered i and ii. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Statement: Only Automobiles and Auto parts, are considered as luxury goods. ABC Ltd., produces luxury goods. Conclusions: i) ABC Ltd., produces only automobiles. ii) ABC Ltd., produces only auto parts. Choose the appropriate one from the following options (A) Only conclusion i follows (B) Only conclusion ii follows (C) Either i or ii follows (D) Neither i nor ii follows (E) Both i and ii follow.
Luxury Goods Production Analysis
The question asks to determine which conclusions logically follow from the given statement about ABC Ltd.'s production.
Statement Interpretation
- Premise 1: "Only Automobiles and Auto parts, are considered as luxury goods." This establishes that the complete set of items classified as luxury goods is limited to these two categories: {Automobiles, Auto Parts}.
- Premise 2: "ABC Ltd. produces luxury goods." This means that the products manufactured by ABC Ltd. must belong to the set defined in Premise 1. Therefore, ABC Ltd. produces items from {Automobiles, Auto Parts}.
Conclusion Validity Check
We must assess whether the given conclusions are necessarily true based on the statement.
- Conclusion i: "ABC Ltd., produces only automobiles."
- This implies ABC Ltd.'s product set is a subset of {Automobiles}.
- However, ABC Ltd. could produce only automobiles, only auto parts, or both automobiles and auto parts, as all are luxury goods.
- Thus, this conclusion is not guaranteed to be true.
- Conclusion ii: "ABC Ltd., produces only auto parts."
- This implies ABC Ltd.'s product set is a subset of {Auto Parts}.
- Similarly, ABC Ltd. might produce automobiles, or both categories, not necessarily only auto parts.
- Thus, this conclusion is also not guaranteed to be true.
Logical Outcome Determination
Since ABC Ltd. produces luxury goods, its products must fall within the {Automobiles, Auto Parts} set. It is possible for ABC Ltd. to produce items from both categories. If ABC Ltd. produces both, then neither Conclusion i (exclusively automobiles) nor Conclusion ii (exclusively auto parts) is accurate.
As there exists a scenario consistent with the premises where both conclusions are false, neither conclusion follows logically beyond a reasonable doubt.
Therefore, the correct choice is that neither conclusion follows.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
- In this question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered i and ii. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
Electrical engineers can apply for the posts currently vacant in ABC company.
Conclusion:
i) Banu, who is a computer engineer can apply for the post in ABC company.
ii) ABC is a company that recruits electrical engineers in abundance.
Choose the appropriate one from the following options
(A) Only conclusion i follows
(B) Only conclusion ii follows
(C) Either i or ii follows
(D) Neither i nor ii follows
(E) Both i and ii follow. - In this question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered i and ii. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
Every kid must practise to drink a litre of water daily.
Conclusion:
i) Drinking water is necessary as kids play daily.
ii) Water protect the kids from diseases.
Choose the appropriate one from the following options
A - The statement is definitely true.
B - The statement is probably true.
C - The statement cannot be determined.
D - The statement is definitely false.
E - Both i and ii follow. In this question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered i and ii. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follo follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
Only rich people live in Seoul. Kim lives in Seoul.
Conclusion:
i) Kim must be rich.
ii) Kim leads a happy life.
Choose the appropriate one from the following options
(A) Only conclusion i follows
(B) Only conclusion ii follows
(C) Either i or ii follows
(D) Neither i nor ii follows
(E) Both i and ii follow
In this question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered i and ii. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
Soyabeans and cloves require a fair amount of farming space to grow. Mr. Ravi has 50 acres of land.
Conclusions:
i) Mr. Ravi can cultivate Soyabeans.
ii) Mr. Ravi can cultivate Cloves.
Choose the appropriate one from the following options
(A) Only conclusion i follows
(B) Only conclusion ii follows
(C) Either i or ii follows
(D) Neither i nor ii follows
(E) Both i and ii follow.
In this question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered i and ii. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
Madhu's house will be neat and tidy.
Conclusion: i) Madhu likes to keep her house neat and tidy.
ii) Madhu spends much time in cleaning her house well.
Choose the appropriate one from the following options
(A) Only conclusion i follows
(B) Only conclusion ii follows
(C) Either i or ii follows
(D) Neither i nor ii follows
(E) Both i and ii follow.
