Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
Conclusions:
I. Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
II. All students will become computer experts.
Analyzing Compulsory Computer Training Conclusions
The question presents a statement about a school's policy and asks us to evaluate two potential conclusions based on that statement. The core task is to determine which conclusion logically follows from the given information.
Statement Analysis
Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
This statement tells us about a mandatory policy implemented by the school. It means every student is required to undergo computer training.
Evaluating Conclusion I
Conclusion I: Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
Why this conclusion follows:
- When a school makes a subject compulsory for all students, it usually reflects the institution's belief in the importance or necessity of that subject.
- Making computer training compulsory suggests the school recognizes the value of computer skills in today's society, often referred to as the 'modern world'.
- Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that the school considers computer knowledge essential for its students' future, aligning with the idea that it's essential in the modern world.
Evaluating Conclusion II
Conclusion II: All students will become computer experts.
Why this conclusion does NOT follow:
- Compulsory training simply means students are required to participate. It does not guarantee the level of proficiency they will achieve.
- Becoming a 'computer expert' implies a very high level of skill, knowledge, and experience.
- Basic training might make students computer literate, but it's unlikely to make all of them experts. Factors like aptitude, interest, time spent, and quality of training vary among individuals.
- The statement only mandates training, not the outcome of expertise for everyone.
Final Deduction
Based on the analysis, only the first conclusion logically follows from the school's decision to make computer training compulsory. The second conclusion makes an assumption about the outcome (expertise) that cannot be guaranteed solely by the act of making the training compulsory.
Similar Questions
The statements given below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Without resolving anything yourself, choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Most of the advocates are hard working.
Manoj is advocate.
Conclusion I: Manoj is politician.
Conclusion II: Some advocates do not work hard.The statement below is followed by two conclusion labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health.
Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
Conclusion II: Milk is harmful for child.The statement below is followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
All organised person find time for entertainment. Mahesh in spite his busy schedule, find time for entertainment.
Conclusion:
I. Mahesh is organized person.
II. Mahesh is an actor.- Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
Conclusions:
I. Social media is more effective than print media for advertising.
II. Print media is obsolete. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are plants.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are plants.
II. All flowers are plants. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "People who regularly exercise are less likely to fall ill."
Conclusions:
I. Regular exercise improves immunity.
II. Illness is directly linked to lack of physical activity. - Statement: Emotional intelligence enhances leadership, but without technical expertise, leaders may fail to meet organizational objectives. Conclusion I: Emotional intelligence alone is not enough for leadership success.
Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Which conclusion follows? - Statement: Innovation requires risk-taking, but excessive risks without planning can lead to failure.
Conclusion I: Risk-taking alone does not guarantee innovation.
Conclusion II: Planning is always necessary for successful innovation.
Which conclusion follows?
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.
Study the given statement and the conclusions carefully and decide which of the following conclusions follow(s) the given statement logically.
Statement:
The British introduced the postal system in India in 1764.
Conclusions:
I. Postal letters often are late, or they are lost.
II. Postmen get less salary, so they tend to do mistakes.
