The statement below is followed by two decisions labeled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the two suggested decisions logically follows for pursuing. Statement: The councilor of the area proposed to install CCTV camera in the locality to avoid crimes and to catch criminals. Decisions: I: Residents should welcome this proposal.
Only I follows
Analyzing the CCTV Proposal Statement and Decisions
This question asks us to evaluate a statement and determine which of the given decisions logically follows based on the information provided in the statement. We must assume the statement is entirely true and base our conclusion solely on it.
Understanding the Statement
The statement presents a proposal by the area councilor:
- Proposal: Install CCTV cameras in the locality.
- Purpose: To avoid crimes and to catch criminals.
The stated purpose of installing CCTV cameras is positive and aims to improve safety and security by reducing crime and aiding in the apprehension of offenders.
Examining the Decisions
Let's look at the two suggested decisions:
- Decision I: Residents should welcome this proposal.
- Decision II: This is useless proposal: resident should oppose it.
Logical Analysis of Decision I
Decision I suggests that residents should welcome the proposal. The statement clearly indicates that the proposal's purpose is to avoid crimes and catch criminals. Measures aimed at crime prevention and capture of criminals are generally considered beneficial for a locality and its residents, as they contribute to a safer environment. Therefore, welcoming a proposal with such stated positive objectives is a logical response based on the information given in the statement.
Logical Analysis of Decision II
Decision II claims the proposal is useless and residents should oppose it. The statement, however, attributes a clear and positive purpose to the proposal (avoiding crime, catching criminals). There is nothing in the statement to suggest the proposal is useless or counterproductive. Assuming the statement is true, the proposal aims to achieve desirable outcomes (reduced crime, captured criminals). Claiming it is useless and opposing it directly contradicts the positive potential outlined in the statement. Thus, Decision II does not logically follow from the information provided.
Conclusion on Which Decision Follows
Based on the logical analysis, the statement presents the installation of CCTV cameras as a measure with positive goals related to crime prevention and capture. Decision I aligns with the potential benefits implied by the statement's purpose, suggesting a welcoming response. Decision II, however, dismisses the proposal as useless, which is not supported by the information in the statement. Therefore, only Decision I logically follows from the given statement.
| Element | Description | Logical Relation to Statement |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | CCTV proposal for crime avoidance and catching criminals. | Forms the basis for evaluation. |
| Decision I | Residents welcome proposal. | Logically follows from the stated positive purpose (crime prevention/capture). |
| Decision II | Proposal is useless, residents oppose. | Does not logically follow; contradicts the stated positive purpose without supporting evidence. |
Revision Table: Statement & Decisions Analysis
Reviewing the core components helps solidify the understanding:
- Statement Focus: CCTV installation.
- Statement Goal: Enhance security, reduce crime.
- Decision I Outcome: Positive reception (welcome).
- Decision II Outcome: Negative reception (oppose, useless).
- Logical Deduction: Positive goal → Logical to welcome.
Additional Information: Logical Reasoning in Decision Making
In logical reasoning questions involving statements and decisions or courses of action, the key is to evaluate which decision is the most logical and practical consequence or response based only on the information given in the statement. We should not bring in outside knowledge, assumptions, or personal opinions about the effectiveness or drawbacks of CCTV cameras in reality. The task is strictly confined to the provided text.
- Assume the statement is 100% true within the context of the problem.
- Evaluate each decision based on whether it is a reasonable, logical, or practical consequence or response to the statement.
- Look for decisions that directly address or logically follow from the facts or intentions presented in the statement.
- Discard decisions that are not supported by the statement or contradict it without justification within the statement itself.
Similar Questions
The statements given below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Without resolving anything yourself, choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Most of the advocates are hard working.
Manoj is advocate.
Conclusion I: Manoj is politician.
Conclusion II: Some advocates do not work hard.The statement below is followed by two conclusion labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health.
Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
Conclusion II: Milk is harmful for child.The statement below is followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
All organised person find time for entertainment. Mahesh in spite his busy schedule, find time for entertainment.
Conclusion:
I. Mahesh is organized person.
II. Mahesh is an actor.- Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
Conclusions:
I. Social media is more effective than print media for advertising.
II. Print media is obsolete. - Statement: Innovation requires risk-taking, but excessive risks without planning can lead to failure.
Conclusion I: Risk-taking alone does not guarantee innovation.
Conclusion II: Planning is always necessary for successful innovation.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are plants.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are plants.
II. All flowers are plants. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "People who regularly exercise are less likely to fall ill."
Conclusions:
I. Regular exercise improves immunity.
II. Illness is directly linked to lack of physical activity. - Statement: Emotional intelligence enhances leadership, but without technical expertise, leaders may fail to meet organizational objectives. Conclusion I: Emotional intelligence alone is not enough for leadership success.
Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
Conclusions:
I. Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
II. All students will become computer experts.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All A are B.
II. Some B are C.
Conclusions:
I. Some A are C.
II. Some A are not C.
III. Some A are B.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
A asked C, "What time is it now?" Is it half past two? ''
Conclusions:
1. A wants to go to lunch.
2. A wants to confirm what the time is because his watch is off.
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie.
Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie.
Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1 : All schools are books.
Statement 2 : No books are papers.
Conclusion I : No schools are books.
Conclusion II : Some books are schools.
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be different from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some P are Q.
II. All P are N.
Conclusion:
I. All Q are N.
II. Some P are not Q.
