The statement below is followed by two conclusion labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing. Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health. Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
Analyzing Statement and Conclusions on Health Benefits of Milk
The question asks us to examine a statement about the health benefits of milk and two conclusions, determining which conclusion(s) logically follow from the statement.
Understanding the Statement and Conclusions
Let's break down the provided information:
- Statement: Drinking milk is beneficial for health.
- Conclusion I: All healthy people drink milk.
- Conclusion II: Milk is harmful for child.
Evaluating Conclusion I: Do all healthy people drink milk?
The statement says that drinking milk is beneficial for health. This means it has a positive effect on health. However, the statement does not claim that drinking milk is the only way to be healthy, or that it is a necessary condition for being healthy.
Think of it this way: Many things are beneficial for health, like eating vegetables, exercising, or getting enough sleep. People can be healthy by doing some or all of these things, or even other things. Just because milk is beneficial does not automatically mean that *all* healthy people *must* drink it. There might be healthy people who get their nutrition or health benefits from other sources, or who cannot drink milk (due to allergies, dietary choices, etc.) but are still healthy through other means.
Therefore, Conclusion I, which makes a universal claim about *all* healthy people, does not logically follow from the statement.
Evaluating Conclusion II: Is milk harmful for children?
The statement says that drinking milk is beneficial for health. The term "health" generally applies to people of all ages, including children, unless a specific exception is mentioned. The statement does not provide any exception for children.
Conclusion II states the opposite of what the statement implies regarding children's health. It claims milk is harmful for children. This directly contradicts the general idea presented in the statement that milk is beneficial for health. If it were harmful for children, the statement would likely specify that it's beneficial only for adults or certain groups, or it wouldn't make such a general claim about health.
Therefore, Conclusion II does not logically follow from the statement; in fact, it contradicts it.
Logical Inference
Based on the analysis of both conclusions, neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II can be logically derived from the given statement. The statement provides a general benefit, but does not support universal claims about who drinks milk or specific claims about harm to a particular group like children.
Conclusion Analysis Summary
| Statement | Conclusion | Logical Follows? | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drinking milk is beneficial for health. | I: All healthy people drink milk. | No | Beneficial does not mean necessary or universally consumed by all healthy individuals. |
| Drinking milk is beneficial for health. | II: Milk is harmful for child. | No | Contradicts the statement's general claim that milk is beneficial for health. |
Therefore, neither conclusion logically follows from the statement.
Revision Table: Statement and Conclusion Reasoning
| Concept | Explanation | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | A piece of information assumed to be true for the purpose of analysis. | The foundation of the reasoning problem. |
| Conclusion | A deduction or inference drawn from the statement(s). | Must be strictly and logically supported by the statement(s). |
| Logically Follows | The conclusion is necessarily true if the statement(s) is/are true, based on logical rules. | Avoid bringing outside knowledge; stick strictly to the given information. |
Additional Information: Reasoning with Statements and Conclusions
Statement and Conclusion questions test your ability to draw logical inferences strictly based on the information provided in the statement, without using any external knowledge or assumptions. Key aspects to remember include:
- Strict Adherence: Only accept what is given in the statement as true. Do not question the statement itself.
- Avoid Assumptions: Do not make assumptions based on your real-world knowledge or common sense, unless they are basic logical principles.
- Keywords: Pay attention to quantifiers like "All," "Some," "No," "Every," and qualifying words like "only," "primarily," "beneficial," "harmful." These words are crucial in determining the scope and certainty of the statement and conclusions.
- Possibility vs. Certainty: A conclusion must be *certainly* true based on the statement, not just possibly true.
- Contradiction: A conclusion that contradicts the statement can never logically follow.
In this specific problem, the word "beneficial" indicates a positive effect but does not imply necessity or universality. The word "harmful" in Conclusion II is a direct contradiction to "beneficial" in the context of health.
Similar Questions
The statements given below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Without resolving anything yourself, choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Most of the advocates are hard working.
Manoj is advocate.
Conclusion I: Manoj is politician.
Conclusion II: Some advocates do not work hard.The statement below is followed by two decisions labeled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and then decide which of the two suggested decisions logically follows for pursuing.
Statement:
The councilor of the area proposed to install CCTV camera in the locality to avoid crimes and to catch criminals.
Decisions:
I: Residents should welcome this proposal.
II: This is useless proposal: resident should oppose it.The statement below is followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
All organised person find time for entertainment. Mahesh in spite his busy schedule, find time for entertainment.
Conclusion:
I. Mahesh is organized person.
II. Mahesh is an actor.- Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Advertisements on social media have more reach than print media."
Conclusions:
I. Social media is more effective than print media for advertising.
II. Print media is obsolete. - Statement: Innovation requires risk-taking, but excessive risks without planning can lead to failure.
Conclusion I: Risk-taking alone does not guarantee innovation.
Conclusion II: Planning is always necessary for successful innovation.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are plants.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are plants.
II. All flowers are plants. - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "People who regularly exercise are less likely to fall ill."
Conclusions:
I. Regular exercise improves immunity.
II. Illness is directly linked to lack of physical activity. - Statement: Emotional intelligence enhances leadership, but without technical expertise, leaders may fail to meet organizational objectives. Conclusion I: Emotional intelligence alone is not enough for leadership success.
Conclusion II: Technical expertise ensures effective leadership.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: The school has made computer training compulsory for all students.
Conclusions:
I. Computer knowledge is essential in the modern world.
II. All students will become computer experts.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All A are B.
II. Some B are C.
Conclusions:
I. Some A are C.
II. Some A are not C.
III. Some A are B.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
A asked C, "What time is it now?" Is it half past two? ''
Conclusions:
1. A wants to go to lunch.
2. A wants to confirm what the time is because his watch is off.
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie.
Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie.
Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1 : All schools are books.
Statement 2 : No books are papers.
Conclusion I : No schools are books.
Conclusion II : Some books are schools.
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be different from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some P are Q.
II. All P are N.
Conclusion:
I. All Q are N.
II. Some P are not Q.
