Statement and argument question consists of a Statement followed by some arguments in against or in favour. Candidates would have to be able to tell the difference between strong and weak arguments. 'Strong' arguments are ones that are both important and directly related to questions, whereas 'weak' arguments are those that are less important and related to questions indirectly.
In this article, all the concepts of the statement and argument along with solved examples, Previous year questions, tips, and tricks are described, which is important for UPSC – CSAT.
|
Table of Contents |



Candidates can use the tips and tricks listed below to answer questions in the Statement and Argument.
There are two different types of questions that can be asked:
In these questions, a statement is followed by two arguments. Candidates must be able to differentiate between strong and weak arguments. In general, these arguments are contrary to each otherand refer to positive and negative results.
Example:
Statement: Should new big industries be started in Ahmedabad?
Arguments:
(a) Yes, it will result in the creation of new work possibilities.
(b) No, it will contribute to the city's pollution.
(c) Only I is strong
(d) Only II is strong
(e) Either I or II is strong
(f) Neither I nor II is strong
(g) Both I and II are strong
Answer: (e) See the Explanation
Clearly, establishing big industries will result in the creation of new work opportunities. As a result, argument I is strong. However, pollution is always a major issue in big industries. As a result, argument II is also strong.
In these questions, a statement is followed by more than two arguments. Candidates are required to distinguish between the strong and weak arguments.
Example:
Statement: Should stylish clothing be banned.
Arguments:
III. Yes, it increases the cost of living.
(a) Only I is strong
(b) Only II is strong
(c) Both I and III is strong
(d) Both II and III is strong
(e) Both I and II are strong
Answer: (b) See the Explanation
Imposing a restriction on stylish clothing will limit an individual's personal choice, and hence his or her right to freedom. As a result, only argument II is desirable.
Geeta : Naresh has become a better boxer since he started meditation.
Radha : Impossible. A boxer’s most important asset is his aggressiveness.
Radha’s statement reflects her belief that (UPSC 2015)
(a) meditation tends to make a person less aggressive
(b) meditation has little or no effect on the person who practises it
(c) Naresh was a poor boxer earlier, because he was not aggressive enough
(d) Naresh would not have taken to meditation as he was a boxer
Answer: (a) See the Explanation
Radha did not accept the argument that a person becomes a better boxer after meditation. The reason for this is that a boxer, according to her, should be aggressive. This indicates that Radha believes that meditation makes a person less aggressive.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Download the PREPP App and attempt FREE IAS Exam Mock Tests and get complete study material!
Comments