All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only

Security Law in Hong Kong - International Relations (IR) Notes

The new security law in Hong Kong gave unilateral powers to China against the pro democracy protestors in Hong Kong region. Hong Kong, formally the Hong Kong Special Administrative Territory of the People's Republic of China (HKSAR), is a Chinese metropolis and special administrative region in the Pearl River Delta in South China. The Hong Kong region is an autonomous region with democracy unlike the communist rule in mainland China. The Sino-British Joint Declaration is a contract agreed in 1984 by the governments of the United Kingdom and China agrees for “one country, two systems” under which Hong Kong was ceded to Chinese authority and how the region would be governed from July 1, 1997. This article discusses the New Security law introduced in Hong Kong. This is an important section for UPSC Exams.

Overview

Overview

  • The Chinese parliament has passed a new Security Law for Hong Kong, effectively ending the territory's autonomy.
  • A draft national security law was recently introduced in China's Parliament, allowing Beijing to design national security regulations for Hong Kong and run its national security apparatus there.
  • It will alter the Basic Law, a mini-constitution that governs Hong Kong's relationship with Beijing.
  • With the exception of defence and international affairs, the Basic Law gives Hong Kong executive, legislative, and independent judicial power, including final adjudication.
  • According to Article 23 of the Basic Law, Hong Kong must enact a national security law "to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organisations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organisations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organisations or bodies," and "to prohibit foreign political organisations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region."
  • Article 23 is intended to protect national security, however, it also allows China's national security organs to operate and establish institutions in Hong Kong.
  • Only Hong Kong's Legislative Council (LegCo) has the authority to make and repeal legislation, according to the Basic Law.
  • Beijing wants LegCo to pass the new legislation as quickly as feasible because it fears that if Democrats take control of LegCo after the 2020 elections, the legislation will be difficult to implement.
  • Democrats oppose the measure because it limits Hong Kong's authority as a Special Administrative Region(SAR). Beijing, however, has the option of bypassing LegCo and making the national security law applicable to Hong Kong by incorporating it in Annex III of the Basic Law.
Other Relevant Links
India China India-China Border Dispute
India China Water Relations Tibetan Policy and Support Act
India-Pakistan India-Bhutan
India-Taiwan India-Maldives
India-Bangladesh India-Afghanistan
India-Nepal South Asia Energy Security
Basic Law

Basic Law

  • In 1997, Hong Kong was returned to China from British sovereignty under a one-of-a-kind agreement based on a mini-constitution known as the Basic Law, and thus the "one nation, two systems" principle was established.
  • The constitution is primarily based totally on the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984, which said that China will honour Hong Kong's liberal policies, governance system, unbiased judiciary, and personal freedoms for a duration of 50 years starting in 1997.
  • The Basic law system in Hong Kong will end 2047.
Umbrella Revolution

Umbrella Revolution

  • Hong Kong citizens have protested numerous times since 1997 in order to safeguard their Basic Law rights.
  • When the Hong Kong administration attempted to enact the national security law for the first time in 2003, the first significant pro-democracy rally occurred.
  • Over one lakh city residents participated in the Umbrella Revolution in 2014 to protest China's refusal to implement democratic changes.
  • The largest demonstration to date occurred in 2019 in opposition to planned extradition law, and pro-democracy marches continued even after the legislation was withdrawn.
Issues with the new security law

Issues with the new security law

  • The law violates the people of Hong Kong's human rights by restricting their freedom of expression and assembly.
  • People could be penalised under the law if they criticise both Beijing and the Chinese Communist Party, as is the case in mainland China.
  • It is in violation of Hong Kong's basic law, which proposes the one-country, two-systems method.
  • Article 22 of Hong Kong's Basic Law has been broken, implying that no central government or agency can interfere with the Special Administrative Region's operations (Hong Kong).
  • Article 12 is also infringed upon, as it implies that there will be a great degree of autonomy.
  • Because China does not engage in state affairs, the US and Hong Kong have an excellent corporate relationship, which will likely deteriorate if the latter becomes a part of mainland China.
  • Thousands of Hong Kong residents have demonstrated against the law, breaking both the law and the social distancing standards created in the aftermath of Covid-19.
International Response

International Response

  • Political leaders from all over the world have issued statements denouncing the measure.
  • The United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia issued a joint statement expressing their "grave worry" about Beijing's planned law.
  • The autonomy of Hong Kong, Germany argues, should not be jeopardised.
  • Taiwan's president has expressed solidarity with Hong Kong residents and vowed support and "essential assistance" to those in need.
  • "Japan is deeply concerned" by China's move toward Hong Kong, according to a statement from Japan's foreign ministry. The two countries have substantial economic links.
Conclusion

Conclusion

Recent anti-extradition protests called into question China's secretive, authoritarian, and oppressive government system, which thinks that people can be controlled at all times. These also gained traction in the United Kingdom, France, the United States, Canada, and Australia, garnering worldwide attention and support. It'll be interesting to observe how Hong Kong handles the problem. The Basic Law's freedoms will expire in 2047, and it is unclear what Hong Kong's status will be after that.

Other Relevant Links
International Relations Notes India and its neighborhood
Indo Pacific region Indian Ocean Region (IOR)
India and central asia India and west asia
India and US India and Europe
India's Foreign Policy International organizations

FAQs

Question: What is the purpose of the National Security Law in Hong Kong?

Answer: The National Security Law in Hong Kong aims to safeguard national security by preventing acts of secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces. It centralizes authority in Beijing and limits the autonomy of Hong Kong.

Question: When was the National Security Law in Hong Kong enacted?

Answer: The National Security Law was enacted on June 30, 2020, by the National People's Congress of China, bypassing Hong Kong’s local legislature.

Question: How does the National Security Law affect Hong Kong’s autonomy?

Answer: The law undermines Hong Kong’s autonomy, as it allows Beijing to exercise control over the city’s legal and political systems, including appointing security officers in Hong Kong and establishing a national security office.

Question: What are the criticisms of the National Security Law in Hong Kong?

Answer: Critics argue that the law violates the “one country, two systems” principle, curtails freedoms of speech, assembly, and press, and undermines the autonomy guaranteed under the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984.

Question: How has the international community reacted to the National Security Law?

Answer: The international community, especially Western nations, has criticized the law as a violation of Hong Kong's freedoms and its high degree of autonomy. Several countries have imposed sanctions on China and Hong Kong officials.

MCQs

1. What was the main aim of the National Security Law enacted in Hong Kong?

A) To ensure the protection of human rights in Hong Kong

B) To preserve the autonomy of Hong Kong

C) To prevent acts of secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces

D) To strengthen economic ties with foreign countries

Answer: (C) See the Explanation

The primary aim of the National Security Law is to prevent acts of secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces, ensuring national security and centralizing authority under Beijing's control.

2. When was the National Security Law for Hong Kong enacted?

A) January 1, 2020

B) June 30, 2020

C) July 1, 2020

D) December 31, 2020

Answer: (B) See the Explanation

The National Security Law was enacted on June 30, 2020, by the National People's Congress of China, bypassing Hong Kong's local legislature.

3. What principle is undermined by the National Security Law in Hong Kong?

A) One country, one system

B) One country, two systems

C) Free market economy

D) Free press and speech

Answer: (B) See the Explanation

The law undermines the "one country, two systems" principle, which was supposed to ensure Hong Kong's autonomy under Chinese sovereignty, allowing the city to maintain its own legal and political systems.

4. Which body passed the National Security Law for Hong Kong?

A) Hong Kong’s Legislative Council

B) National People’s Congress of China

C) United Nations General Assembly

D) Hong Kong’s Chief Executive

Answer: (B) See the Explanation

The National People's Congress of China passed the National Security Law, bypassing Hong Kong's legislative processes.

5. Which of the following rights are seen as being curtailed by the National Security Law in Hong Kong?

A) Right to vote

B) Freedom of speech and assembly

C) Right to free healthcare

D) Right to free education

Answer: (B) See the Explanation

The National Security Law curtails fundamental rights, particularly the freedom of speech, assembly, and press, by allowing the Chinese government to intervene in Hong Kong's internal matters and suppress dissent.

GS Mains Questions and Model Answers

Q1: Examine the implications of the National Security Law on the autonomy of Hong Kong.

Answer: The National Security Law represents a significant step in reducing Hong Kong’s autonomy as it grants Beijing unprecedented powers over Hong Kong's legal and political systems. The law undermines the “one country, two systems” framework that had been in place since the handover of Hong Kong from Britain to China in 1997. The law allows Beijing to establish security offices in Hong Kong, appoint security officers, and intervene in legal matters concerning national security. This diminishes the autonomy granted to Hong Kong, particularly in handling its legal affairs and governance. As a result, the law has been viewed by many as a violation of the Sino-British Joint Declaration and a threat to the freedoms previously enjoyed by Hong Kong’s citizens.

Q2: How has the international community responded to the National Security Law in Hong Kong?

Answer: The international community, particularly Western countries, has strongly criticized the National Security Law as a violation of Hong Kong’s freedoms and autonomy. The United States, Canada, the UK, and the European Union have condemned the law and imposed sanctions on Chinese and Hong Kong officials involved in its implementation. The law has been viewed as an infringement on human rights, particularly the rights to free speech, assembly, and press. These nations argue that the law undermines the “one country, two systems” principle and erodes the high degree of autonomy guaranteed to Hong Kong under the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration. Additionally, several countries have extended residency options to Hong Kong citizens, allowing them to flee the city due to fears of repression.

Q3: Analyze the impact of the National Security Law on Hong Kong's economy and international relations.

Answer: The National Security Law has had profound implications on Hong Kong’s economy and international relations. Economically, the law has caused uncertainty among investors, with many fearing that the erosion of Hong Kong’s freedoms could undermine its status as a global financial hub. This has led to capital flight and a decline in investor confidence. Furthermore, Hong Kong's international relations have been strained, particularly with countries like the United States, the UK, and Australia, which have criticized the law and imposed sanctions. These tensions have led to a shift in Hong Kong's trade relations, with an increasing alignment with mainland China. The law has also led to reduced access to global markets for some sectors of the economy, particularly those linked to international trade and finance.

Previous Year Questions on  New Security Law in Hong Kong.

1. UPSC CSE Prelims 2020:

Question: The enactment of the National Security Law for Hong Kong has been criticized globally for undermining the autonomy of Hong Kong. What was the main principle that this law violated?

A) Free speech and free press
B) The principle of one country, two systems
C) Right to self-determination
D) Right to education

Answer: (B)

Explanation: The National Security Law violated the “one country, two systems” principle, which was meant to ensure that Hong Kong maintains a high degree of autonomy and preserves its freedoms, including political and legal autonomy, under Chinese sovereignty.

2. UPSC CSE Mains 2020 (GS Paper 2):

Question: Critically evaluate the implications of the National Security Law for Hong Kong's autonomy and international relations.

Answer: The National Security Law imposed by Beijing drastically reduces Hong Kong's autonomy, diminishing the “one country, two systems” principle. The law allows Beijing to exercise control over Hong Kong’s legal, political, and judicial systems. It also undermines fundamental freedoms, including freedom of speech and assembly, leading to a more repressive environment. Internationally, the law has strained Hong Kong’s relations with Western nations, resulting in sanctions and diplomatic tensions. Economically, the law has led to capital flight, a decline in investor confidence, and a shift in Hong Kong’s trade relationships towards mainland China.

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.
How likely are you to recommend Prepp.in to a friend or a colleague?
Not so likely
Highly likely

Comments

No comments to show
UPSC CSE (IAS) 2027 Prelims Mock Test Series
Live Quizzes
Free
• Live
UPSC IAS : Modern India : Civil Uprisings before 1857
12 Minutes
10 Questions
20 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Test will end in 13:20:20
View More
Quizzes
Free
13 August 2026 Daily CA Quiz for UPSC & State PSCs
8 Minutes
5 Questions
10 Marks
English, Hindi, Tamil +7 More
Attempted by 3,612 aspirants in 12 hours
Free
12 August 2026 Daily CA Quiz for UPSC & State PSCs
8 Minutes
5 Questions
10 Marks
English, Hindi, Tamil +7 More
Attempted by 3,611 aspirants in 12 hours
View More
Live Tests
Free
• Live
UPSC IAS : GS - Modern History - Subject Knowledge Test
35 Minutes
30 Questions
60 Marks
English, Hindi
Test will end in 21:20:19
Free
• Live
Mini Live Test : UPSC CSE Prelims GS 2027 (Aug 12 - 15)
36 Minutes
30 Questions
60 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Test will end on 15th Aug, 07:00 PM
View More
Full Tests
plus
Full Test - 02: UPSC CSE Prelims CSAT (Paper-II)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 16 aspirants in 12 hours
Free
Full Test - 01: UPSC CSE Prelims CSAT (Paper-II)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 15 aspirants in 12 hours
Previous Year Papers
plus
UPSC CSE Prelims 2026 GS Paper 1 Question Paper (24-May-2026)
120 Minutes
100 Questions
200 Marks
17,149 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 119 aspirants in 12 hours
plus
UPSC CSE Prelims 2026 CSAT Paper 2 Question Paper (24-May-2026)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
17,179 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 120 aspirants in 12 hours
View More