All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only

Need To Frame Guidelines To Protect Journalists’ Digital Privacy: SC

Relevance: GS2 - Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation. Important aspects of governance, transparency and accountability,

(Source: The Hindu, 11/08/2023)

Click here for Daily Current Affairs

Why in the news?

  • Recently, the Supreme Court highlighted the need for guidelines to protect the privacy of journalists when their personal digital devices are seized by Central agencies.
  • The Supreme Court had ruled in the K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India verdict in 2017 that the right to privacy was a fundamental and inalienable right.

Digital Privacy

What was the petition before the Supreme Court?

  • The Foundation for Media Professionals filed a petition before the Supreme Court claiming that journalists were being harassed and that their digital devices containing private information were being seized.
    • This had affected them in multiple ways even impairing their ability to pay their children’s school fees.
    • They also expressed concern that it could be used to extract confidential information about their sources.
  • Petitioners claimed that the digital devices of more than hundreds of journalists had been seized.
    • However, there was a lack of adequate guidelines about what could be seized or accessed, and what kind of protection is ensured for personal data, health data, financial data, etc.
  • The petitioners claimed that the case was about state power versus an individual’s privilege.
    • They also claimed that investigative agencies forced people under investigation to forcibly provide a password or biometric that would not be allowed under the compelled test under Article 20.

What has the Supreme Court said on digital privacy of journalists?

  • A bench of Supreme Court Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia observed that the government should frame guidelines to protect the digital privacy of journalists.
  • The Court disagreed with the Additional Solicitor-General’s claim that the petitioners desired a virtual shut out of investigative agencies.
    • The ASG was directed to report the progress made by the government on the guidelines at the next hearing.
  • The Court highlighted the need for a balanced approach in order to protect the interests of media professionals.
  • It emphasized that investigative agencies could not be given complete freedom and powers to seize the personal digital devices of citizens.
    • It stated that the court itself would have to frame the guidelines if they were not framed by the government.
  • It also observed that state power must not be used to squash individual rights of citizens.
  • The bench also reiterated that the right to privacy was a fundamental and inalienable right as per the verdict of the Supreme Court in the K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India case (2017).

Right to Privacy in India

  • The right to privacy is safeguarded as an essential aspect of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 in Part III of the Constitution.
  • The privacy granted by Article 21 comprises:
    • the right to physical autonomy
    • the right to informational privacy
    • the right to privacy of choice.

Constitutional Provisions

  • Right to life in Article 21 encompasses all elements of life that contribute to a person's sense of meaning, including privacy.
    • In Kharak Singh vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh (1962), the Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy is a component of the right to life and personal freedom.
  • In the K.S.Puttaswamy decision, the Court ruled that the right to privacy is safeguarded as a basic constitutional right under Articles 14, 19, and 21.
  • There are some reasonable restrictions on right to privacy, such as
    • India's sovereignty and integrity.
    • The state's security.
    • Friendly ties with other countries
    • Public decency, morality, or public order
    • Contempt of court, slander, or encouragement to commit a crime.
  • It can also be limited by procedure established by law if it is just, fair and reasonable, or if there is a compelling State interest to be served.

To know more, click the link.

Press Freedom in India

  • Press freedom is a fundamental principle under which journalists and media organizations can operate without censorship or government interference.
  • It is an essential aspect of a democratic society and the principle of the freedom of expression.
  • It covers the following areas:
  • Freedom from Censorship: Journalists and media outlets must be able to publish or broadcast news and information without government-imposed censorship.
  • Access to Information: A free press should have access to information and sources to investigate and report on matters of public interest.
  • Independence: Editorial independence ensures that news reporting is based on facts and not influenced by outside interests.
  • Protection of Sources: Journalists should be able to protect their sources to encourage whistleblowers and informants to come forward with information without fear of exposure or reprisal.
  • Pluralism and Diversity: A free press should encompass a diverse range of viewpoints and opinions, allowing for open debate and discussion in society.
  • Accountability: The media should hold those in power accountable by investigating and reporting on their actions and decisions.
  • Constitutional Background: Although freedom of the ress is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, it is provided under Article 19(1)(a).
  • Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights also guarantees the right to freedom of opinion and expression.
    • Status of Press Freedom in India:
    • In 2023, India ranked 161st among the 180 countries with a score of 36.62 out of 100. In 2022, India’s rank was 150.

What is the Importance of a Free Press for India?

  • Democracy and Accountability: Unless journalists are allowed to freely investigate and report on government actions, policies, and decisions, they will be unable to fulfill their role as the Fourth Estate and hold officials accountable for their actions.
    • It promotes transparency and accountability in governance as it helps uncover corruption, human rights abuses, and other wrongdoing, making it difficult for those in authority to act with impunity.
    • A free press acts as a check on the abuse of power by the government and other powerful entities
  • Public awareness: Free and unrestricted journalism enables citizens to stay informed of current events, government activities, and societal issues.
    • This will help them participate actively in the democratic process.
  • Encourages diversity: A free press provides a platform for diverse voices and viewpoints and ensures that the concerns of various communities are heard.
  • Protection of Fundamental Rights: A free press is a guardian of fundamental rights, including the right to freedom of expression and the right to know. It helps protect these rights by advocating for the rights of individuals and groups.
  • Global reputation: India's reputation on the global stage can be improved through its commitment to press freedom as it demonstrates the country’s commitment to democratic values and human rights.

K.S Puttuswamy verdict

  • The Puttuswamy vs Union of India case 2017 involved a writ petition filed in the Supreme Court by retired Justice Puttaswamy challenging the validity of Aadhar.
  • According to the petitioner, the Aadhar breached the right to privacy which previous rulings of the SC has outlined as a fundamental right.

Verdict

  • A nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court iruled that the basic right to privacy is guaranteed by Article 21 of India's constitution.
  • It ruled that privacy is to be an intrinsic component of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
    • Under Article 21, the right to privacy is safeguarded as an integral aspect of the right to life and personal liberty, as well as one of the freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution.
  • The Supreme Court recognized the need for a careful balance between individual privacy and the actions of the government.
  • All laws and activities must be consistent with the constitution and fundamental rights cannot be granted or taken away by legislation,.
  • However, the right to privacy is not absolute and that any invasion of privacy by a state or non-state actor must pass the triple test.
  • The triple test consists of:
    • Legitimate Aim
    • Proportionality
    • Legality
  • The bench also overturned the SC verdict in M P Sharma vs. Satish Chandra, which held that the right to privacy is not protected by the Indian Constitution.
  • It also overruled the judgment in Kharak Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh to the extent that it holds that the right to privacy is not protected by the Constitution.

To know more, click the link.

(*Click this link to read prelims specific weekly current affairs articles)

FAQs

Question: What is the right to privacy?

Answer:

The Right to Privacy is an intrinsic part of the Right to Life and Liberty under Article 21. It protects the individual from interference from both State, and non-State actors and allows the individuals to make autonomous life choices.

Question: What are the provisions of Article 20?

Answer:

Article 20 provides protection against arbitrary and excessive punishment to an accused citizen or foreigner or legal person. It contains three provisions related to:

  • No ex-post-facto law: No person shall be convicted for the violation of a law not in force at the time of the act or subjected to a penalty greater than prescribed by the law in force at the time of the act.
  • No double jeopardy: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
  • No self-incrimination: No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

UPSC Mains Practice Question:
  1. Examine the scope of Fundamental Rights in the light of the latest judgment of the Supreme Court on Right to Privacy. (UPSC GS2 2017)

MCQs

Question: ‘Right to Privacy’ protected under which Article of the constitution of India? (UPSC CSE 2021)

(a) Article 15

(b) Article 19

(c) Article 21

(d) Article 29

Answer: (c) See the Explanation

In the K.S Puttuswamy case, the Supreme Court ruled the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed in Article 21 also implicitly includes a right to privacy.

Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.

Question: Right to Privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of Right to Life and Personal Liberty. Which of the following in the Constitution of India correctly and appropriately imply the above statement? (UPSC 2018)

(a) Article 14 and the provisions under the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution

(b) Article 17 and the Directive Principles of State Policy in Part IV

(c) Article 21 and the freedoms guaranteed in Part. III

(d) Article 24 and the provisions under the 44th Amendment to the Constitution

Answer: (c) See the Explanation

  • The Supreme Court ruled that "the right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as a part of the
  • freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution.
  • Article 14 ensures theRight to Equality while the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act 1976, is known as mini constitution.
  • Article 17 is related to the Abolition of Untouchability while Part IV i.e the Directive Principles of State Policy do not mention the Right to Privacy.
  • Article 24 is concerned with the prohibition of employment of children in
  • factories, et(c) and the 44th Constitution Amendment was concerned with nullifying some of the provisions of the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976.

Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.
How likely are you to recommend Prepp.in to a friend or a colleague?
Not so likely
Highly likely

Comments

No comments to show
UPSC CSE (IAS) 2027 Prelims Mock Test Series
Live Quizzes
Free
• Live
UPSC IAS : Culture of India: Education, Philosophy and Science
12 Minutes
10 Questions
20 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Test will end on 27th Jul, 10:00 AM
View More
Quizzes
Free
24 July 2026 Daily CA Quiz for UPSC & State PSCs
8 Minutes
5 Questions
10 Marks
English, Hindi, Telugu +7 More
MEDIUM
Attempted by 478 aspirants in 12 hours
Free
23 July 2026 Daily CA Quiz for UPSC & State PSCs
8 Minutes
5 Questions
10 Marks
English, Hindi, Telugu +7 More
MEDIUM
Attempted by 468 aspirants in 12 hours
View More
Live Tests
plus
• Live
Live Test : UPSC CSE Prelims CSAT (Paper-II) (July 22 - 25)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Test will end in 00:20:33
Free
• Live
UPSC IAS : CSAT - Mini Live Test
40 Minutes
30 Questions
75 Marks
English, Hindi
Test will end in 23:20:33
View More
Full Tests
Free
Full Test - 01: UPSC CSE Prelims CSAT (Paper-II)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 15 aspirants in 12 hours
Free
Full Test - 01: UPSC CSE Prelims GS 2027
120 Minutes
100 Questions
200 Marks
1,025 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 14 aspirants in 12 hours
Previous Year Papers
plus
UPSC CSE Prelims 2026 GS Paper 1 Question Paper (24-May-2026)
120 Minutes
100 Questions
200 Marks
13,131 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 118 aspirants in 12 hours
plus
UPSC CSE Prelims 2026 CSAT Paper 2 Question Paper (24-May-2026)
120 Minutes
80 Questions
200 Marks
13,123 Attempted
English, Hindi
MEDIUM
Attempted by 119 aspirants in 12 hours
View More