Three resistors with magnitudes 2, 4, and 8 ohms are connected in parallel. The equivalent resistance of the system would be
Less than 2 ohm
When resistors are connected in parallel, the electrical current has multiple paths to flow. The equivalent resistance of a parallel combination is the total resistance that a single resistor would need to have to produce the same overall effect on the circuit as the combined resistors.
The question asks us to find the equivalent resistance of three resistors with values 2 Ω, 4 Ω, and 8 Ω connected in parallel.
For resistors connected in parallel, the reciprocal of the equivalent resistance (\(R_{eq}\)) is equal to the sum of the reciprocals of the individual resistances. If we have resistors \(R_1, R_2, R_3, \dots, R_n\) in parallel, the formula is:
\( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_3} + \dots + \frac{1}{R_n} \)
In this problem, we have three resistors with resistances \(R_1 = 2 \, \Omega\), \(R_2 = 4 \, \Omega\), and \(R_3 = 8 \, \Omega\). We will use the formula for parallel resistance:
\( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_3} \)
Substitute the given values:
\( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{2 \, \Omega} + \frac{1}{4 \, \Omega} + \frac{1}{8 \, \Omega} \)
To add these fractions, we need to find a common denominator. The least common multiple of 2, 4, and 8 is 8.
Now, add the fractions:
\( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{4}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{1}{8} \)
\( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{4 + 2 + 1}{8} \)
\( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{7}{8 \, \Omega} \)
To find \(R_{eq}\), we take the reciprocal of both sides:
\( R_{eq} = \frac{8}{7} \, \Omega \)
The equivalent resistance is \(R_{eq} = \frac{8}{7} \, \Omega\). Let's calculate the approximate value:
\( R_{eq} \approx 1.14 \, \Omega \)
Now, let's compare this value with the given options:
Our calculated equivalent resistance of \( \frac{8}{7} \, \Omega \approx 1.14 \, \Omega \) is less than 2 Ω. This matches Option 1.
A crucial principle for parallel resistor combinations is that the equivalent resistance is always less than the smallest individual resistance in the combination. In this problem, the individual resistances are 2 Ω, 4 Ω, and 8 Ω. The smallest resistance is 2 Ω. Therefore, the equivalent resistance must be less than 2 Ω. Our calculated value, \( \frac{8}{7} \, \Omega \approx 1.14 \, \Omega \), is indeed less than 2 Ω, which is consistent with this principle.
| Step | Description | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identify individual resistances | \(R_1 = 2 \, \Omega\), \(R_2 = 4 \, \Omega\), \(R_3 = 8 \, \Omega\) |
| 2 | Write the parallel resistance formula | \( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_3} \) |
| 3 | Substitute values | \( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{8} \) |
| 4 | Find common denominator (8) and add fractions | \( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{4}{8} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{1}{8} = \frac{7}{8} \) |
| 5 | Take reciprocal to find \(R_{eq}\) | \( R_{eq} = \frac{8}{7} \, \Omega \) |
| 6 | Compare \(R_{eq}\) with options | \( \frac{8}{7} \approx 1.14 \, \Omega \), which is less than 2 Ω |
It is helpful to understand the difference between series and parallel resistor connections and how their equivalent resistances are calculated.
For \(R_1, R_2, \dots, R_n\) in series: \( R_{eq} = R_1 + R_2 + \dots + R_n \)
In a series combination, the equivalent resistance is always greater than the largest individual resistance.
For \(R_1, R_2, \dots, R_n\) in parallel: \( \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \dots + \frac{1}{R_n} \)
In a parallel combination, the equivalent resistance is always less than the smallest individual resistance.
Understanding these rules helps predict the range of the equivalent resistance in different circuit configurations.
Consider the following part of an electric circuit:

The total electrical resistance in the given part of the electric circuit is
Consider the following circuit:

Which one of the following is the value of the resistance between points A and B in the circuit given above?
What is the total resistance in the following circuit element?

Three wires each of length \(L\), cross-sectional area \(A\) and resistivity \(\rho\) are connected as shown in the figure.
These are to be replaced by another wire of same resistivity such that the resistance between points \(X\) and \(Z\) does not change. If \(L_1\) is the length and \(A_1\) is the cross-sectional area of the new wire, then which one among the following is correct?
Consider the following electric circuit:

Two equal resistors R are connected in parallel, and a battery of 12 V is connected across this combination A dc current of 100 mA flows through the circuit as shown below:

The value of R is
A metallic wire having a resistance of 20Ω is cut into two equal parts in length. These parts are then connected in parallel. The resistance of this parallel combination is equal to
Consider the following circuit:

The equivalent resistance of the circuit will be
A cell of negligible resistance and e.m.f 2 volt is connected to series combination of 2 ohm, 3 ohm and 5 ohm. The potential difference across the 3 ohm resistance is:
3 resistors of 3 ohm each connected in series. What is the mean values of resistors?
Ten cells, each of 2 volts emf and 1 ohm internal resistance are connected in series. What is the current flowing through a resistance of 10 ohms connected across this combination of cells?
Three resistor, each equal to 3 Ω are connected so as to form a triangle. The equivalent resistance between any two vertices of the triangle is: