All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Consider the given statements to be true and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statements.

Statements:

Though there is advanced medical facilities available nowadays, still child mortality in India is high.

Conclusions:

1. Medical scientists should be asked to give up their job and work as doctors to save lives.

2. The Government has to make efforts to decrease child mortality.

The correct answer is

Only conclusion 2 follows.

Analyzing Statements and Conclusions on Child Mortality in India

Let's carefully examine the given statements and the conclusions to determine which one logically follows.

Statements Analysis

The statements provide us with two pieces of information:

  • Statement 1: There are advanced medical facilities available nowadays.
  • Statement 2: Despite these advanced facilities, child mortality in India is still high.

These statements present a situation where a desired outcome (low child mortality, presumably expected with advanced facilities) is not being achieved. This indicates that either the advanced facilities are not being utilized effectively, or other factors are significantly contributing to the high child mortality rate.

Conclusion Analysis

Now, let's evaluate each conclusion based on the information in the statements.

Conclusion 1: Medical scientists should be asked to give up their job and work as doctors to save lives.

  • The statements do not provide any information about the number of doctors, the roles of medical scientists versus doctors, or suggest that a shortage of doctors is the cause of high child mortality.
  • Medical scientists are typically involved in research and developing new medical advancements, which are related to the "advanced medical facilities" mentioned. Their work is crucial for future healthcare improvements.
  • Asking medical scientists to become doctors is a specific proposed action that is not logically supported by the general statements about facility availability and high mortality. The statements do not imply that the problem is a lack of practitioners rather than, for example, access issues, cost, public health infrastructure, or other socio-economic factors.
  • Therefore, this conclusion does not logically follow from the given statements.

Conclusion 2: The Government has to make efforts to decrease child mortality.

  • The statements explicitly state that child mortality in India is high.
  • High child mortality is a major public health concern for any nation.
  • Addressing widespread public health issues like high child mortality is typically a primary responsibility of the government or its public health agencies.
  • The existence of a significant problem like high child mortality naturally leads to the need for concerted efforts to reduce it. The government is the appropriate body to lead such large-scale efforts, which might include improving access to facilities, implementing health programs, addressing malnutrition, improving sanitation, etc.
  • This conclusion is a reasonable and logical inference drawn from the fact that a serious public health problem (high child mortality) exists.
  • Therefore, this conclusion logically follows from the given statements.

Logical Deduction from Statements

Based on the analysis, only Conclusion 2 logically follows from the statements. The fact that child mortality is high in India, even with advanced medical facilities, strongly implies that efforts are needed to combat this issue, and the government is the entity responsible for leading such efforts on a national scale.

Revision Table: Statements & Conclusions

Statements Conclusions Logically Follows? Reasoning
Though there is advanced medical facilities available nowadays, still child mortality in India is high. 1. Medical scientists should be asked to give up their job and work as doctors to save lives. No Statements don't support this specific action or imply a lack of doctors is the cause.
2. The Government has to make efforts to decrease child mortality. Yes High child mortality is a public health issue requiring government intervention.

Additional Information on Child Mortality and Public Health

Child mortality rate is a key indicator of a country's development and health status. Reducing child mortality is a global goal (e.g., part of the Sustainable Development Goals).

Several factors can contribute to high child mortality, even when medical facilities are advanced:

  • Access to facilities: Facilities might be available but not accessible to all due to distance, cost, or lack of awareness.
  • Quality of care: The quality of care provided in available facilities might vary.
  • Preventable causes: Many child deaths are due to preventable causes like malnutrition, lack of immunization, poor sanitation, and lack of access to clean water.
  • Socio-economic factors: Poverty, education levels of parents, and living conditions play a significant role.
  • Public health infrastructure: Effective public health programs for maternal and child health, immunization drives, and health education are crucial.

Governments play a critical role in addressing child mortality through:

  • Formulating policies and programs.
  • Investing in public health infrastructure.
  • Improving access to healthcare, especially in rural and remote areas.
  • Running immunization campaigns and health awareness programs.
  • Addressing underlying issues like poverty, sanitation, and nutrition.

Therefore, concluding that the government needs to make efforts to decrease child mortality is a logical step when presented with the fact that it is currently high, regardless of other factors mentioned.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions

  1. A situation is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the situation and both the conclusions carefully and select the correct answer.

    Situation:

    Since the past 15 years, 75% of the products in the world’s pottery market comes from Country K. However, the employment in the pottery industry of Country K has been consistently declining by 5-9% every year since the past 3 years.

    Conclusions:

    I. Even after declining employment, Country K has enough potters to continue contributing equally to the international market.

    II. The local demand of pottery in Country K has substantially decreased leading to less interest among potters.

  2. The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.

    Statements:

    1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.

    2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.

    Conclusions:

    I. Schools are not establishments.

    II. All schools have buildings.

    III. Schools do not have buildings.
  3. Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.

    Statements:

    The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.

    Mumbai is in India.

    Conclusion:

    The Gateway of India is in India.

  4. Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.

    Statements:

    Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.

    Vikram is handsome.

    Conclusion:

    Vikram is intellectual.
  5. Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.

    Statement:

    This book can help because all good books help.

    Conclusions:

    I. This is not a good book.

    II. This is a good book.

    III. No good book helps.

    IV. Some good books help.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App