A statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Statement: Quality food is expensive. The restaurant owners are renovating the restaurant as the furniture had become old. Conclusion: I. The quality of the restaurant’s food will improve. II. All restaurants have to be renovated when their furniture becomes old.
Neither I nor II follows
Understanding the Statement and Conclusions
Let's break down the given statement and the two conclusions to determine which conclusion logically follows from the statement.
The statement consists of two separate pieces of information:
- Statement Part 1: Quality food is expensive.
- Statement Part 2: The restaurant owners are renovating the restaurant as the furniture had become old.
Now let's look at the conclusions:
- Conclusion I: The quality of the restaurant’s food will improve.
- Conclusion II: All restaurants have to be renovated when their furniture becomes old.
Analyzing Conclusion I: Food Quality Improvement
Conclusion I claims that the quality of the restaurant's food will improve. The statement mentions that quality food is expensive. It also mentions that the restaurant is being renovated because the furniture is old.
Does the fact that the furniture is being renovated necessarily mean the food quality will improve? The renovation is explicitly stated to be because of old furniture, which is related to the physical appearance and comfort of the restaurant, not directly to the kitchen, ingredients, or cooking processes that determine food quality.
There is no information in the statement that links the renovation of furniture to an improvement in food quality. The statement only links food quality to its expense. Therefore, we cannot definitely conclude that the quality of the restaurant's food will improve based solely on the renovation due to old furniture.
Analyzing Conclusion II: General Renovation Rule
Conclusion II claims that all restaurants have to be renovated when their furniture becomes old. The statement says, "The restaurant owners are renovating the restaurant as the furniture had become old." This statement is specific to one particular restaurant (the one mentioned). It describes the action being taken by *these* specific restaurant owners for *their* specific restaurant due to *its* old furniture.
Does this specific instance mean that *all* restaurants are required to renovate when their furniture gets old? No, the statement provides information only about the reasons for renovation for this one restaurant. It does not establish a universal rule or obligation for all restaurants. Other restaurants might choose not to renovate, or they might renovate for different reasons.
Therefore, we cannot definitely conclude that all restaurants have to be renovated when their furniture becomes old based on the information provided.
Conclusion Summary
Based on our analysis:
- Conclusion I does not follow because the reason for renovation (old furniture) is unrelated to food quality improvement according to the statement.
- Conclusion II does not follow because the statement describes a specific event for one restaurant, not a general rule applicable to all restaurants.
Hence, neither conclusion I nor conclusion II can be definitely drawn from the given statement.
| Statement Component | Implied Information | Connection to Conclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Quality food is expensive. | Price is related to food quality. | No direct link to renovation or a general rule about all restaurants. |
| Restaurant owners are renovating. | Action being taken by owners. | Does not imply food quality change or a rule for all restaurants. |
| Reason: Furniture old. | Cause for this specific renovation. | Unrelated to food quality; specific reason, not a general rule. |
Revision Table: Statement and Conclusion Key Points
| Concept | Explanation | Importance in this Question |
|---|---|---|
| Statement Analysis | Carefully reading and understanding the given facts. | Identifying the specific facts about quality food expense and the reason for renovation. |
| Drawing Conclusions | Deducing information that *must* be true based *only* on the statement. | Ensuring the conclusions are strictly supported by the provided information, not outside knowledge or assumptions. |
| Generalization | Applying a specific observation to a broader group (e.g., all restaurants). | Recognizing that a statement about one instance does not automatically create a rule for all instances. |
Additional Information: Logical Reasoning Basics
Statement and Conclusion questions are a common type of logical reasoning problem. The key is to stick strictly to the information given in the statement and not introduce any outside knowledge or assumptions. You must determine what can be logically and necessarily deduced from the given premises.
- If a conclusion is probably true, or might be true, but is not guaranteed to be true based *only* on the statement, then it does not follow.
- Look for keywords that generalize (like "all", "every", "always") or specific qualifiers (like "some", "many", "this restaurant").
- Ensure the conclusion directly flows from the facts presented in the statement.
In this problem, the renovation reason is specific (old furniture), and the action is specific to "The restaurant owners". Neither fact supports a conclusion about food quality improvement nor a universal rule for all restaurants.
Similar Questions
Given below is a statement followed by two conclusion numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, even if it appears at variance from commonly known facts. Then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them information given in the statement.
Statement:
A research found that if high school students get eight hours of sleep instead of 6 hours before exam, then their marks improve by 20%
Conclusions:
I. Eight hours of sleep is better than six hours of sleep if a student wants better marks.
II. Student are stressed as all exams are tough.
A statement/group of statements is given followed by some conclusion. Choose the conclusion that logically follows from the given statements.
Statement: All hardworking worker in the factory have been promoted in the last five year:Consider the given statement true and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
The population in metro cities in increasing tremendously which leads to the shortage of living space and a drop-in living conditions of the people.
Conclusion:
1.Government should re-plan city development
2.Government should demolish illegal buildings and build cottages for people.
Consider the given statements as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.
Statements:
People think that paying tax to government is a burden and waste. Hence, they avoid paying tax or don’t pay tax promptly.
Conclusions:
- Government should create awareness among the people that paying tax helps to build nation.
- Tax should be increased so that more money is collected.
Decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement.
Statements:
Politicians marry only beautiful girls. X is a beautiful girl.
Conclusions:
1. X will marry a politician.
2. X won’t marry a politician.Consider the given statement true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.
Statement:
People complain that bus tickets are not available during festival seasons.
Conclusions:
1. People should be advised not to travel during festival seasons.
2. The government should bring in more buses during festival seasons.
Decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement.
Statements:
Poverty is increasing because politicians don’t understand poverty, nor do they know anything about the problems faced by the poor.
Conclusions:
- All politicians should be replaced.
- All politicians should be asked to live in poor conditions.
- Given below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow (s), beyond a reasonable doubt, from the information given in the statement.
Statement: The colour of blood is red due to the presence of red blood cells.
Conclusion I: If red blood cells are removed, blood will lose its red colour.
Conclusion II: Red blood cells will be red as long as they remain in the blood. One statement is given followed by two conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: As income increases, cars become more affordable.
Conclusion I: With greater use of technology, cars are now cheaper than they were a generation ago.
Conclusion II: Cars will become so numerous that no future technology will solve the traffic problem.A statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
Emotional Quotient is a good predictor of success in career.
Conclusions:
I: The top 10 employees in a division will have the top 10 Emotional Quotients.
I: Finding the Emotional Quotient of a candidate will give the hiring company extra useful information.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
A situation is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the situation and both the conclusions carefully and select the correct answer.
Situation:
Since the past 15 years, 75% of the products in the world’s pottery market comes from Country K. However, the employment in the pottery industry of Country K has been consistently declining by 5-9% every year since the past 3 years.
Conclusions:
I. Even after declining employment, Country K has enough potters to continue contributing equally to the international market.
II. The local demand of pottery in Country K has substantially decreased leading to less interest among potters.
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.
