Consider the given statement true and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement. Statement: The population in metro cities in increasing tremendously which leads to the shortage of living space and a drop-in living conditions of the people. Conclusion: 1.Government should re-plan city development 2.Government should demolish illegal buildings and build cottages for people.
Only conclusion 1 follows.
Let's analyze the given statement and the conclusions to determine which one logically follows.
Understanding the Statement and Conclusions
The statement describes a problem in metro cities related to population increase. This increase leads to a shortage of living space and a decrease in the living conditions for the people in these cities. We need to find which of the proposed solutions, listed as conclusions, is a logical next step based solely on the information provided in the statement.
Statement: The population in metro cities is increasing tremendously which leads to the shortage of living space and a drop-in living conditions of the people.
Conclusion 1: Government should re-plan city development.
Conclusion 2: Government should demolish illegal buildings and build cottages for people.
Analyzing Conclusion 1: Re-plan City Development
Conclusion 1 suggests that the government should re-plan city development. The statement highlights issues caused by population growth, specifically the shortage of living space and declining living conditions in metro cities. Re-planning city development is a broad action that directly addresses these problems. A comprehensive city development plan could include strategies for managing population density, creating more housing, improving infrastructure, and optimizing the use of available space. Therefore, re-planning city development is a logical response to the problems described in the statement.
Analyzing Conclusion 2: Demolish Illegal Buildings and Build Cottages
Conclusion 2 proposes specific actions: demolish illegal buildings and build cottages. While demolishing illegal buildings might free up some space, the statement does not mention illegal buildings as the cause of the shortage. Building cottages is also a very specific type of housing, and it's not clear from the statement whether this is a feasible or sufficient solution for the widespread shortage of living space for a large, increasing population in metro cities. The statement provides general issues, and this conclusion suggests a very specific and potentially limited solution that isn't directly supported as the necessary consequence of the provided information. Thus, this conclusion does not logically or necessarily follow from the statement alone.
Evaluating Logical Follows
Based on our analysis:
- Conclusion 1 addresses the core issues of population increase, living space shortage, and living conditions in metro cities by suggesting a relevant, overarching strategy (re-planning city development). This follows logically.
- Conclusion 2 proposes specific actions (demolishing illegal buildings, building cottages) that are not directly supported or implied by the general problems outlined in the statement. It does not necessarily follow.
Therefore, only Conclusion 1 logically follows from the given statement.
Revision Table: Statement and Conclusions Logic
| Component | Details from Statement | Logical Implication for Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Cause | Tremendous population increase in metro cities. | Solutions should address managing growth or its effects. |
| Problem 1 | Shortage of living space. | Solutions need to increase available space or use it more efficiently. |
| Problem 2 | Drop in living conditions. | Solutions should aim to improve quality of life and infrastructure. |
| Conclusion 1 | Re-plan city development. | Broad strategy addressing space, conditions, and growth management. Logically follows. |
| Conclusion 2 | Demolish illegal buildings & build cottages. | Specific actions not directly implied by the problem description. Does not necessarily follow. |
Additional Information: Statement and Conclusion Questions
Statement and Conclusion questions test your ability to analyze given information (the statement) and determine which potential follow-up statements (the conclusions) are logically supported by that information. Here are some key points to remember:
- Stick to the Statement: Only use the information provided in the statement. Do not bring in outside knowledge or assumptions.
- Look for Logical Connections: A conclusion must be a direct and necessary consequence of the statement.
- Avoid Specificity vs. Generality: If a statement is general, a highly specific conclusion may not logically follow unless the statement strongly implies it. If a statement is specific, a very general conclusion might not follow directly.
- Keywords Matter: Pay close attention to keywords and phrases in the statement.
- Possibility vs. Certainty: A conclusion must *logically follow*, meaning it must be true if the statement is true, not just possibly true.
In this case, the statement presents general problems of urban population growth and its consequences. Conclusion 1 offers a general, relevant solution (re-planning) that encompasses addressing these consequences. Conclusion 2 offers specific solutions (demolishing illegal buildings, building cottages) that are not directly derived from the statement's information about the *causes* or *nature* of the problems.
Similar Questions
Given below is a statement followed by two conclusion numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, even if it appears at variance from commonly known facts. Then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them information given in the statement.
Statement:
A research found that if high school students get eight hours of sleep instead of 6 hours before exam, then their marks improve by 20%
Conclusions:
I. Eight hours of sleep is better than six hours of sleep if a student wants better marks.
II. Student are stressed as all exams are tough.
A statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: Quality food is expensive. The restaurant owners are renovating the restaurant as the furniture had become old.
Conclusion:
I. The quality of the restaurant’s food will improve.
II. All restaurants have to be renovated when their furniture becomes old.
A statement/group of statements is given followed by some conclusion. Choose the conclusion that logically follows from the given statements.
Statement: All hardworking worker in the factory have been promoted in the last five year:Consider the given statements as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.
Statements:
People think that paying tax to government is a burden and waste. Hence, they avoid paying tax or don’t pay tax promptly.
Conclusions:
- Government should create awareness among the people that paying tax helps to build nation.
- Tax should be increased so that more money is collected.
Decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement.
Statements:
Politicians marry only beautiful girls. X is a beautiful girl.
Conclusions:
1. X will marry a politician.
2. X won’t marry a politician.Consider the given statement true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.
Statement:
People complain that bus tickets are not available during festival seasons.
Conclusions:
1. People should be advised not to travel during festival seasons.
2. The government should bring in more buses during festival seasons.
Decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement.
Statements:
Poverty is increasing because politicians don’t understand poverty, nor do they know anything about the problems faced by the poor.
Conclusions:
- All politicians should be replaced.
- All politicians should be asked to live in poor conditions.
- Given below is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow (s), beyond a reasonable doubt, from the information given in the statement.
Statement: The colour of blood is red due to the presence of red blood cells.
Conclusion I: If red blood cells are removed, blood will lose its red colour.
Conclusion II: Red blood cells will be red as long as they remain in the blood. One statement is given followed by two conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: As income increases, cars become more affordable.
Conclusion I: With greater use of technology, cars are now cheaper than they were a generation ago.
Conclusion II: Cars will become so numerous that no future technology will solve the traffic problem.A statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
Emotional Quotient is a good predictor of success in career.
Conclusions:
I: The top 10 employees in a division will have the top 10 Emotional Quotients.
I: Finding the Emotional Quotient of a candidate will give the hiring company extra useful information.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
A situation is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the situation and both the conclusions carefully and select the correct answer.
Situation:
Since the past 15 years, 75% of the products in the world’s pottery market comes from Country K. However, the employment in the pottery industry of Country K has been consistently declining by 5-9% every year since the past 3 years.
Conclusions:
I. Even after declining employment, Country K has enough potters to continue contributing equally to the international market.
II. The local demand of pottery in Country K has substantially decreased leading to less interest among potters.
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.
