A statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement. Statement: Emotional Quotient is a good predictor of success in career. Conclusions: I: The top 10 employees in a division will have the top 10 Emotional Quotients. I: Finding the Emotional Quotient of a candidate will give the hiring company extra useful information.
The question provides a statement relating Emotional Quotient (EQ) to success in a career and asks us to evaluate which of the given conclusions logically follow from this statement.
Statement: Emotional Quotient is a good predictor of success in career.
Conclusions:
The statement says that Emotional Quotient (EQ) is a good predictor of success. The term "good predictor" implies a strong correlation or relationship, meaning that generally, higher EQ is associated with greater success. However, it does not mean EQ is the only factor determining success, nor does it mean there is a perfect one-to-one mapping or ranking.
Conclusion I states that the top 10 employees will necessarily have the top 10 Emotional Quotients. This implies a perfect, direct correlation where ranking in success perfectly matches ranking in EQ. Since the statement only says EQ is a "good predictor" (not a perfect or sole predictor), other factors also contribute to career success. An employee might be highly successful due to skills, experience, networking, opportunities, etc., even if their EQ is not among the absolute top 10. Similarly, someone with a very high EQ might not be in the top 10 employees for other reasons.
Therefore, Conclusion I does not logically follow from the statement. A "good predictor" indicates a tendency or likelihood, not a guaranteed perfect ranking.
The statement establishes that Emotional Quotient (EQ) is a good predictor of success in career. For a hiring company, success in career is a desirable trait in a candidate.
If EQ is a good predictor of career success, then knowing a candidate's EQ score would provide information that is relevant to predicting their potential success. Information that helps predict future success is considered useful in the hiring process.
Therefore, finding the Emotional Quotient of a candidate would indeed give the hiring company extra useful information related to their potential career success.
This conclusion logically follows from the statement.
Based on the analysis, only conclusion II logically follows from the given statement.
| Element | Content | Logical Implication from Statement |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | Emotional Quotient is a good predictor of success in career. | EQ has a positive correlation with career success, providing useful predictive information. Not necessarily the only or perfect predictor. |
| Conclusion I | The top 10 employees in a division will have the top 10 Emotional Quotients. | Implies a perfect rank correlation. |
| Conclusion II | Finding the Emotional Quotient of a candidate will give the hiring company extra useful information. | Implies EQ score provides useful information for predicting success. |
| Follows? | Conclusion I | No. "Good predictor" does not guarantee perfect ranking. |
| Follows? | Conclusion II | Yes. "Good predictor" does imply providing useful predictive information. |
Emotional Quotient (EQ), also known as Emotional Intelligence (EI), refers to the ability to understand, use, and manage one's own emotions in positive ways to relieve stress, communicate effectively, empathize with others, overcome challenges, and defuse conflict.
While traditional intelligence (IQ) measures cognitive abilities, EQ focuses on emotional and social skills. Research suggests that both IQ and EQ contribute to success, but in different ways. EQ is often considered crucial for interpersonal relationships, leadership, adaptability, and resilience, all of which are important for navigating the complexities of a career environment.
Being a "good predictor" means that EQ accounts for a significant portion of the variance in career success outcomes, but not all of it. Other factors like domain expertise, technical skills, education, experience, work ethic, networking, and even external circumstances also play vital roles. Therefore, while a high EQ can significantly increase the likelihood of success and provide a competitive edge, it is usually one of several contributing factors, not a sole determinant.
Hiring companies often use various assessment methods, including personality tests and behavioural interviews, which can sometimes provide insights into a candidate's emotional intelligence. This information, when combined with assessments of skills, experience, and other relevant factors, helps create a more comprehensive profile of the candidate's potential fit and success within the organization.
Given below is a statement followed by two conclusion numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, even if it appears at variance from commonly known facts. Then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them information given in the statement.
Statement:
A research found that if high school students get eight hours of sleep instead of 6 hours before exam, then their marks improve by 20%
Conclusions:
I. Eight hours of sleep is better than six hours of sleep if a student wants better marks.
II. Student are stressed as all exams are tough.
A statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: Quality food is expensive. The restaurant owners are renovating the restaurant as the furniture had become old.
Conclusion:
I. The quality of the restaurant’s food will improve.
II. All restaurants have to be renovated when their furniture becomes old.
A statement/group of statements is given followed by some conclusion. Choose the conclusion that logically follows from the given statements.
Statement: All hardworking worker in the factory have been promoted in the last five year:Consider the given statement true and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
The population in metro cities in increasing tremendously which leads to the shortage of living space and a drop-in living conditions of the people.
Conclusion:
1.Government should re-plan city development
2.Government should demolish illegal buildings and build cottages for people.
Consider the given statements as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.
Statements:
People think that paying tax to government is a burden and waste. Hence, they avoid paying tax or don’t pay tax promptly.
Conclusions:
Decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement.
Statements:
Politicians marry only beautiful girls. X is a beautiful girl.
Conclusions:
1. X will marry a politician.
2. X won’t marry a politician.Consider the given statement true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.
Statement:
People complain that bus tickets are not available during festival seasons.
Conclusions:
1. People should be advised not to travel during festival seasons.
2. The government should bring in more buses during festival seasons.
Decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the information given in the statement.
Statements:
Poverty is increasing because politicians don’t understand poverty, nor do they know anything about the problems faced by the poor.
Conclusions:
One statement is given followed by two conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: As income increases, cars become more affordable.
Conclusion I: With greater use of technology, cars are now cheaper than they were a generation ago.
Conclusion II: Cars will become so numerous that no future technology will solve the traffic problem.A situation is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the situation and both the conclusions carefully and select the correct answer.
Situation:
Since the past 15 years, 75% of the products in the world’s pottery market comes from Country K. However, the employment in the pottery industry of Country K has been consistently declining by 5-9% every year since the past 3 years.
Conclusions:
I. Even after declining employment, Country K has enough potters to continue contributing equally to the international market.
II. The local demand of pottery in Country K has substantially decreased leading to less interest among potters.
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.