A question is given followed by two Statements I and II. Consider the Question and the Statements and mark the correct option. Question: Statement I: 2 is one of the factors. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Question and the Statements?
What is the smallest 1-digit number having exactly 4 distinct factors?
Statement II: 3 is one of the factors.
The Question can be answered even without using any of the Statements.
The question asks us to find the smallest 1-digit number that has exactly 4 distinct factors. We are also given two statements about this number and asked which statement(s) are needed to answer the question.
First, let's understand what a 1-digit number is. These are the integers from 1 to 9.
Next, we need to understand what distinct factors are. Factors of a number are integers that divide the number evenly. Distinct factors means counting each unique factor only once.
We need to find the 1-digit number that has precisely 4 distinct factors, and among those, identify the smallest one.
Let's list the 1-digit numbers and their factors:
| Number | Factors | Number of Distinct Factors |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | {1} | 1 |
| 2 | {1, 2} | 2 |
| 3 | {1, 3} | 2 |
| 4 | {1, 2, 4} | 3 |
| 5 | {1, 5} | 2 |
| 6 | {1, 2, 3, 6} | 4 |
| 7 | {1, 7} | 2 |
| 8 | {1, 2, 4, 8} | 4 |
| 9 | {1, 3, 9} | 3 |
From the table, the 1-digit numbers that have exactly 4 distinct factors are 6 and 8.
We need the smallest of these numbers. Comparing 6 and 8, the smallest number is 6.
So, the smallest 1-digit number having exactly 4 distinct factors is 6.
We were able to determine this number (6) by simply analyzing the definition of 1-digit numbers and factors, without needing any additional information.
Now let's look at the statements:
However, the core task was to find the smallest 1-digit number with exactly 4 distinct factors. We did this by systematically checking the numbers from 1 to 9, which revealed that 6 is the smallest such number. The statements provide properties of this number (6), but were not necessary to find the number itself based on the original criteria (smallest 1-digit number with exactly 4 factors).
Since we could find the number (6) directly from the question's criteria (smallest 1-digit number with exactly 4 distinct factors) without referring to Statement I or Statement II, the question can be answered even without using any of the statements.
By examining all 1-digit numbers and their factors, we identified that 6 is the smallest among them with exactly 4 distinct factors. This process did not require using Statement I or Statement II. Therefore, the question can be answered independently of the given statements.
| Number | Factors | # Factors | Exactly 4 Factors? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | {1} | 1 | No |
| 2 | {1, 2} | 2 | No |
| 3 | {1, 3} | 2 | No |
| 4 | {1, 2, 4} | 3 | No |
| 5 | {1, 5} | 2 | No |
| 6 | {1, 2, 3, 6} | 4 | Yes |
| 7 | {1, 7} | 2 | No |
| 8 | {1, 2, 4, 8} | 4 | Yes |
| 9 | {1, 3, 9} | 3 | No |
From the table, numbers 6 and 8 have exactly 4 factors. The smallest is 6.
The number of factors a positive integer has is related to its prime factorization. If a number $\text{N}$ can be written as $\text{N} = \text{p}_1^{\text{a}_1} \times \text{p}_2^{\text{a}_2} \times \dots \times \text{p}_{\text{k}}^{\text{a}_{\text{k}}$, where $\text{p}_1, \text{p}_2, \dots, \text{p}_{\text{k}}$ are distinct prime numbers and $\text{a}_1, \text{a}_2, \dots, \text{a}_{\text{k}}$ are positive integers, then the total number of distinct factors of $\text{N}$ is given by the product of one more than each exponent:
Number of factors $= (\text{a}_1 + 1)(\text{a}_2 + 1)\dots(\text{a}_{\text{k}} + 1)$.
For example:
This confirms that 6 and 8 are indeed 1-digit numbers with exactly 4 distinct factors.
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
P and Q walk along a circular track. They start at 5:00 a.m. from the same point in opposite directions. P walks at an average speed of 5 rounds per hour and Q walks at an average speed of 3 rounds per hour.
How many times will they cross each other between 5:20 a.m. and 7:00 a.m.?
A set (X) of 20 pipes can fill 70% of a tank in 14 minutes. Another set (Y) of 10 pipes fills 3/8 of the tank in 6 minutes. A third set (Z) of 16 pipes can empty half of the tank in 20 minutes. If half of the pipes of set X are closed and only half of the pipes of set Y are open, then how long will it take to fill 50% of the tank, if all pipes of set Z are open?
The 5-digit number PQRST (all distinct digits) is such that T ≠ 0, P is thrice T. S is greater than Q by 4, while Q is greater than R by 3. How many such 5-digit numbers are possible?
X can complete one-third of a certain work in 6 days, Y can complete one-third of the same work in 8 days and Z can complete three-fourth of the same work in 12 days. All of them work together for n days and then X and Z quit and Y alone finishes the remaining work in 82⁄3 days. What is n equal to?
Consider a set of 11 numbers:
Value-I = Minimum value of the average of the numbers of the set when they are consecutive integers ≥ -5.
Value-II = Minimum value of the product of the numbers of the set when they are consecutive non-negative integers.
Which one of the following is correct?
A 4-digit number N is such that when divided by 3, 5, 6, 9 leaves a remainder 1, 3, 4, 7 respectively. What is the smallest value of N?
The average of three numbers p, q and r is k. p is as much more than the average as q is less than the average. What is the value of r?
What is X in the sequence:
24, X, 12, 18, 36, 90 ?
If P = +, Q = −, R = ×, S = ÷, then insert the proper notations between the successive numbers in the equation:
60_15_3_20_4 = 20
The compound interest on Rs. 75,000 for three years, at successive interest rates of 4%, 6% and 9% for each year respectively is:
The value of x in the following figures is :

When a child reaches adolescence, there is apt to be a conflict between the parents and the child, since
the latter considers himself to be by now quite capable of managing his own affairs, while the former
are filled with parental solicitude, which is often a disguise for love of power. Parents consider, usually,
that the various moral problems which arise in adolescence are peculiarly their province. The options
they express, however, are so dogmatic that the young seldom confide in them, and usually go their
own way in secret.