A natural number N is such that it can be expressed as N = p + q + r, where p, q and r are distinct factors of N. How many numbers below 50 have this property?
8
The problem asks us to find the count of natural numbers N, less than 50, that can be expressed as the sum of three distinct factors of N. Let these distinct factors be p, q, and r, such that p < q < r and N = p + q + r.
For N to be the sum of three distinct factors, it must have at least three distinct factors. Numbers with only one or two factors (prime numbers and 1) are immediately ruled out. Also, the smallest possible sum of three distinct factors for any number greater than 1 will always be the sum of its three smallest factors. These are typically 1, the smallest prime factor, and the next smallest factor.
For N = p + q + r, where p, q, r are distinct factors of N, the smallest possible sum of three distinct factors is $1 + (\text{smallest prime factor}) + (\text{second smallest factor})$. Since p, q, and r must be distinct, $p \ge 1$, $q \ge 2$ (if 2 is a factor) or $q \ge 3$ (if 2 is not a factor but 3 is), and $r$ would be the next distinct factor. If N has factors 1, 2, and 3, the smallest sum is $1+2+3=6$. Thus, any number N satisfying this property must be at least 6.
We need to examine each natural number N from 6 up to 49. For each N, we will find all its factors and check if any combination of three distinct factors sums up to N.
Let's check some numbers:
We continue this process for all numbers from 6 to 49. We found that numbers 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 satisfy the property.
| Number N | Factors of N | Distinct Factors p, q, r such that N = p + q + r | Satisfies Property? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 1, 2, 3, 6 | 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 | Yes |
| 12 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12 | 2 + 4 + 6 = 12 | Yes |
| 18 | 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18 | 3 + 6 + 9 = 18 | Yes |
| 24 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 | 4 + 8 + 12 = 24 | Yes |
| 30 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 30 | 5 + 10 + 15 = 30 | Yes |
| 36 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, 36 | 6 + 12 + 18 = 36 | Yes |
| 42 | 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 21, 42 | 7 + 14 + 21 = 42 | Yes |
| 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 | 8 + 16 + 24 = 48 | Yes |
The natural numbers below 50 that satisfy the property N = p + q + r, where p, q, and r are distinct factors of N, are:
By checking each number from 6 to 49, we found that there are 8 such numbers that can be expressed as the sum of three distinct factors.
| Concept | Description | Relevance to Problem |
|---|---|---|
| Natural Number | A positive integer (1, 2, 3, ...). | The numbers N we are examining are natural numbers below 50. |
| Factor (Divisor) | A number that divides another number evenly (with no remainder). | The numbers p, q, and r must be factors of N. |
| Distinct Factors | Factors that are different from each other (p ≠ q, q ≠ r, p ≠ r). | The condition explicitly states the factors must be distinct. |
| Sum of Factors | Adding the values of selected factors. | We check if N equals the sum of three distinct factors. |
Exploring factors is a fundamental part of number theory. Every natural number greater than 1 has at least two factors: 1 and itself. Numbers with exactly two factors are called prime numbers. Numbers with more than two factors are called composite numbers.
Finding factors of a number N involves testing divisibility by numbers from 1 up to $\sqrt{N}$. If a number i divides N evenly, then i and N/i are both factors. For example, to find factors of 36, we check divisibility from 1 up to $\sqrt{36} = 6$.
The factors of 36 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 36. This systematic approach helps ensure all factors are found when checking the condition N = p + q + r.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, September
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?