Read the following passage and answer the items that follow the passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passage only. Passage-2 “A good statesman, like any other sensible human being, learns more from his opponents than from his fervent supporters. For his supporters will push him to disaster unless his opponents show him where the dangers are. So if he is wise he will often pray to be delivered from his friends, because they will ruin him. But, though it hurts, he ought also to pray never to be left without opponents; for they keep him on the path of reason and good sense. The national unity of free people depends upon a sufficiently even balance of political power to make it impracticable for the administration to be arbitrary and for opposition to be revolutionary and irreconcilable.”
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
In a democracy, the opposition is indispensable for the balance of political power and good governance.
The passage discusses the crucial role of opponents, particularly in the context of a statesman or ruler. It argues that a wise statesman learns more from opponents than from fervent supporters. Supporters, the author suggests, might lead one to disaster unless checked by opponents who reveal potential dangers. The passage emphasizes that opponents keep the statesman "on the path of reason and good sense."
Furthermore, the passage connects this idea to the national unity of free people, stating it depends on a "sufficiently even balance of political power." This balance prevents the administration from becoming arbitrary and the opposition from becoming revolutionary or irreconcilable. Essentially, the presence of effective opposition ensures a necessary check on power and promotes sensible decision-making.
Let's examine each option in light of the passage's message:
Based on the analysis, the passage's core message is that a strong and effective opposition is not just beneficial, but necessary (indispensable) in a democracy. It serves to balance political power, prevent the government from becoming arbitrary, guide the administration towards reason and good sense, and ultimately contributes to good governance and national unity. Option 4 best encapsulates this critical message.
| Concept | Passage's View | Why it matters for Democracy |
|---|---|---|
| Supporters | Can lead to disaster if unchecked | Blind support lacks critical feedback |
| Opponents (Opposition) | Show dangers, keep on path of reason & good sense | Provide checks & balances, ensure accountability |
| Balance of Power | Ensured by interaction of administration & opposition | Prevents arbitrary rule & revolutionary opposition, maintains unity |
| Good Governance | Achieved through learning from opponents & staying on path of reason | Requires diverse perspectives & accountability |
The concept highlighted in the passage is fundamental to the functioning of a healthy democracy. The opposition plays several vital roles:
An effective opposition is thus considered a cornerstone of good governance and a robust democratic system, ensuring that the government remains responsive, responsible, and reflective of the diverse needs and opinions of the populace. The passage strongly advocates for the indispensable nature of this opposition role.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, September
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?