Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
Cannot be determined
To solve the problem, we need to analyze the information given:
- Team X scored a total of \(N\) runs in 20 overs.
- Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs than Team X.
- Had Team Y’s average run rate been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs.
Let's understand and calculate the given conditions:
- Over Calculation for Team Y:
Team Y tied the score in 10% less time than Team X.- 10% of 20 overs is calculated as \(\frac{10}{100} \times 20 = 2\) overs.
- Therefore, Team Y used \(20 - 2 = 18\) overs to tie the score with Team X.
- Run Rate Analysis for Team Y:
Team Y’s run rate becomes 50% higher in another scenario leading to tying the score in 12 overs.- Let Team Y's initial run rate be \(r\).
- The current scenario for score tie in 18 overs implies: \(18 \times r = N\).
- If the run rate was 50% higher, the new run rate \(= 1.5r\).
- Increased run rate scenario gives: \(12 \times 1.5r = N\).
- Comparing the Two Situations:
We have:- \(18r = N\)
- \(18r = 12 \cdot 1.5r\) (from the condition in step 2)
- Since both equations represent the same \(N\), solving them we see both give the same value of \(N\).
Conclusion:
Based on the above analysis, we cannot directly calculate the exact number of runs scored by Team X. Thus, the most appropriate choice from the options given is "Cannot be determined."
Similar Questions
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, SeptemberThe price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Green energy production can be linked to/integrated with the climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.
II. Effects of climate change are much more severe in coastal and mountainous regions.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Important Questions from Miscellaneous Topics
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
