All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which one of the following is not correct about Administrative Tribunals?

This question was previously asked in
CDS I 2019 Elementary Mathematics Previous Year Paper (03-Feb-2019)
The correct answer is

Tribunals established by a law of the Parliament can exclude the jurisdiction of all Courts to allow for special leave to appeal.

Understanding Administrative Tribunals in India

Administrative Tribunals are specialized judicial bodies established in India to adjudicate disputes related to recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of any State or of any local or other authority within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India or of any corporation owned or controlled by the Government.

They were established to reduce the burden on traditional courts and provide speedy and expert justice in service matters. Article 323A of the Constitution empowers Parliament to establish Administrative Tribunals.

Analyzing Statements about Administrative Tribunals

Let's examine each statement provided about Administrative Tribunals:

  • Statement 1: The Parliament may by law constitute Administrative Tribunals both at the Union and State levels.

    This statement is correct. Article 323A(1) of the Constitution explicitly states that Parliament may, by law, provide for the adjudication or trial by Administrative Tribunals of disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of any State or of any local or other authority.

  • Statement 2: Tribunals may look into disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services.

    This statement is correct. As mentioned in the purpose of Administrative Tribunals and outlined in Article 323A(1), their primary function is to handle disputes and complaints regarding the recruitment and conditions of service for public servants.

  • Statement 3: Tribunals established by a law of the Parliament can exclude the jurisdiction of all Courts to allow for special leave to appeal.

    This statement is not correct. While the original intent behind Articles 323A and 323B was to potentially exclude the jurisdiction of courts (specifically High Courts) in the matters assigned to tribunals, the Supreme Court in the landmark L. Chandra Kumar vs Union of India (1997) case held that the power of judicial review of the High Courts (under Articles 226/227) and the Supreme Court (under Article 32) constitutes a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. Therefore, tribunal decisions are subject to judicial review by the concerned High Court and then appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 136 (Special Leave Petition). A law establishing tribunals cannot completely exclude the jurisdiction of all courts, particularly the High Courts and the Supreme Court.

  • Statement 4: The law establishing the Tribunals may provide for procedures including rules of evidence to be followed.

    This statement is correct. Article 323A(2)(d) allows the law made by Parliament establishing tribunals to specify the procedure (including provisions as to the limitation of time and the evidence to be received) to be followed by these Tribunals. Administrative Tribunals are generally not bound by the strict rules of procedure laid down in the Civil Procedure Code or the strict rules of evidence laid down in the Indian Evidence Act; they are guided by the principles of natural justice.

Identifying the Incorrect Statement

Based on the analysis, the statement that is not correct about Administrative Tribunals is Statement 3. Administrative Tribunals cannot exclude the jurisdiction of the High Courts and the Supreme Court, as judicial review by these higher courts is a basic feature of the Constitution.

Revision Table: Administrative Tribunals

Feature Description Relevant Constitutional Article
Establishment Parliament can establish at Union & State levels Article 323A
Jurisdiction Scope Disputes on recruitment & service conditions of public servants Article 323A
Procedural Powers Law establishing tribunals can specify procedures & evidence rules Article 323A(2)(d)
Judicial Review Decisions subject to review by High Courts & Supreme Court L. Chandra Kumar case (1997) interpreting Articles 226/227, 32, 136

Additional Information: Administrative Tribunals in India

The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was enacted by Parliament under Article 323A. This Act provides for the establishment of a Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and State Administrative Tribunals (SATs).

  • Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT): Deals with service matters of employees of the Central Government, including All India Services and civilians in defence services.
  • State Administrative Tribunals (SATs): Established by the Central Government on specific request from the concerned State Governments to deal with service matters of State Government employees.
  • The Chairman and Members of these tribunals are appointed by the President. They consist of judicial and administrative members to ensure a blend of legal expertise and administrative experience.
  • Initially, decisions of Administrative Tribunals could be challenged only before the Supreme Court via special leave petition (Article 136). However, the L. Chandra Kumar case mandated that challenges must first go before a Division Bench of the concerned High Court.
Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. Which one among the following was demanded by the All India Depressed Classes Leaders' Conference at Bombay in 1931?

  2. The khuntkatti tenure was prevalent in which one of the following regions of India during the British Colonial Rule ?

  3. Who took over the 'Eka Movement’ started by the Congress in Awadh during 1921-1922?

  4. Which of the following statements about the Non-Cooperation Movement is/are correct?

    1. It was marked by significant participation of peasants from Karnataka.

    2. It was marked by non-Brahmin lower caste participation in Madras and Maharashtra.

    3. It was marked by the lack of labour unrest in places like Assam, Bengal and Madras.

    4. It was badly shaken by the Chauri Chaura incident in 1922 after which Gandhiji decided to continue with the movement on a much smaller scale.

    Select the correct answer using the code given below.
  5. Which one of the following statements about the All India Depressed Classes Association is not correct?

  6. Directions: The item consists of two statements, Statement I and Statement II. Examine these two statements carefully and select the correct answer using the code given below.

    Statement I:

    The Pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators cultivating lands on a contractual basis.

    Statement II:

    The Pahi-kashta peasants worked under the temptation of favourable terms of revenue or the compulsion of economic distress.

  7. Which one of the following statements about the National Green Tribunal is not correct?

  8. Consider the following statements:

    1. In the 19 th century, peasants in various parts of India rose in revolt against moneylenders and grain dealers.

    2. In May 1875, at village Supa in Poona District in the Bombay Deccan, peasants attacked shopkeepers, burnt the bahi khatas (account books), looted grain shops and set fire to the houses of Sahukars.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  9. Which one of the following pairs of Newspaper and Editor is not correctly matched?

    N ewspaperEditor
    (a)NavjivanMahatma Gandhi
    (b)MahrattaBal Gangadhar Tilak
    (c)BengaleeSurendranath Banerjea
    (d)Voice of IndiaGopal Krishna Gokhale
  10. Who among the following founded the Bhil Seva Mandal in 1922?


Important Questions from Other Dimensions

  1. Which of the following statements is correct regarding Tebhaga Movement?

    1. This movement was organized by the Kisan Sabha.

    2. It was against Jotedars and moneylenders

    3. It was led by Swami Sadanand

  2. In 1937 in the Daundi-Lohara Zamindari there was a peasant movement, in which the peasants observed Satyagraha under the leadership of who of the following?

  3. In which of the following countries did the concept of Public Interest Litigation originate?

  4. Who wrote the following comments regarding social change in the nineteenth century?

    "All progress in social liberation tends to be a change from the law of status to the law of contract, from the restraints of family and caste, customs to the self-imposed restraints of the free will of the individual" 

  5. What is formal Education? Choose the correct alternative given below.

    (a) In teaching methodology, the classroom teaching method and direct presence of teacher to teach is important.

    (b) The curriculum is pre-decided.

    (c) The curriculum is prepared as per need.

    (d) There are different levels. The access to the next level of education is not possible without completion of the prior level of education.

Need Expert Advice?
Upcoming Exams
NDA
September 13, 2026
CDS
September 13, 2026
Test Series
CDS img
Defence
UPSC CDS 2026 Mock Test Series
540 Tests 4 Tests Free
1419 Attempts
4.3(172)
English, Hindi
More Questions from CDS

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App