Three statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, Il and lII. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All fruits are wines. Some wines are juices. All juices are alcohols. Conclusions: I. Some alcohols are juices. Il. Some wines are alcohols. III. Some wines are fruits.
All conclusions follow
Solving the Syllogism: Fruits, Wines, Juices, and Alcohols
This question asks us to evaluate the logical validity of three conclusions based on three given statements. We will use the principles of deductive reasoning, often visualized with Venn diagrams, to determine which conclusions logically follow from the provided statements.
Understanding the Syllogism Statements
The statements are:
- All fruits are wines. (This is an A-type statement: All A are B)
- Some wines are juices. (This is an I-type statement: Some A are B)
- All juices are alcohols. (This is an A-type statement: All A are B)
We assume these statements are true, regardless of whether they align with real-world facts.
Analyzing the Conclusions
The conclusions we need to test are:
- Some alcohols are juices.
- Some wines are alcohols.
- Some wines are fruits.
Evaluating Each Conclusion Using Logic or Venn Diagrams
Let's examine each conclusion based on the given statements.
Conclusion I: Some alcohols are juices.
Look at Statement 3: "All juices are alcohols." If every single juice is an alcohol, it automatically means that there must be some alcohols that are juices. This is a direct implication of an 'All A are B' statement; it converts to 'Some B are A'.
Conclusion I logically follows from Statement 3.
Conclusion II: Some wines are alcohols.
Consider Statements 2 and 3: "Some wines are juices" and "All juices are alcohols."
- Statement 2 tells us there is an overlap between the set of wines and the set of juices.
- Statement 3 tells us that the entire set of juices is contained within the set of alcohols.
If some wines are in the set of juices, and the entire set of juices is inside the set of alcohols, then those wines that are juices must also be alcohols. Therefore, there is an overlap between the set of wines and the set of alcohols.
Conclusion II logically follows from Statements 2 and 3.
Conclusion III: Some wines are fruits.
Look at Statement 1: "All fruits are wines." If every single fruit is a wine, it means the set of fruits is entirely contained within the set of wines. If the set of fruits is inside the set of wines, then there must be some wines that are fruits (specifically, all the wines that are also fruits). This is the conversion of 'All A are B' to 'Some B are A'.
Conclusion III logically follows from Statement 1.
Summary of Conclusions
Based on our analysis, all three conclusions logically follow from the given statements.
| Conclusion | Statements Used | Follows? | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| I. Some alcohols are juices. | Statement 3 (All juices are alcohols) | Yes | If all J are A, then some A are J. |
| II. Some wines are alcohols. | Statements 2 (Some wines are juices) & 3 (All juices are alcohols) | Yes | If some W are J, and all J are A, then some W are A. |
| III. Some wines are fruits. | Statement 1 (All fruits are wines) | Yes | If all F are W, then some W are F. |
Final Answer Derivation
Since conclusions I, II, and III all logically follow from the statements, the correct option is the one stating that all conclusions follow.
Revision Table: Key Syllogism Conversions
Understanding how different types of statements can be converted is useful in solving syllogism problems.
| Original Statement Type | Form (All S are P / Some S are P etc.) | Valid Conversion |
|---|---|---|
| A (Universal Affirmative) | All S are P | Some P are S |
| E (Universal Negative) | No S are P | No P are S (Simple Conversion) |
| I (Particular Affirmative) | Some S are P | Some P are S (Simple Conversion) |
| O (Particular Negative) | Some S are not P | No valid conversion generally |
In this problem:
- "All fruits are wines" (A type) converts to "Some wines are fruits" (Conclusion III).
- "All juices are alcohols" (A type) converts to "Some alcohols are juices" (Conclusion I).
Conclusion II requires combining statements using standard rules or visualizing with diagrams, as explained above.
Additional Information: Syllogism Basics
A syllogism is a type of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true. It typically involves three parts: a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion.
In competitive exams, syllogism questions test your ability to analyze given statements and determine which conclusions can be logically drawn from them. Common types of statements are Universal Affirmative (All A are B), Universal Negative (No A are B), Particular Affirmative (Some A are B), and Particular Negative (Some A are not B).
Techniques like Venn diagrams or rules of syllogism can be used to solve these problems accurately. Remember to only use the information provided in the statements and not rely on outside knowledge.
Similar Questions
Three statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All pencils are colours.
All colours are paints.
Some paints are drawings.
Conclusions:
I. Some pencils are drawings.
II. Some paints are colours.
III. Some colours are pencils
Three statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some teachers are scientists.
All scientists are doctors.
All doctors are engineers.
Conclusions:
I. Some doctors are teachers.
II. Some engineers are teachers.
III. Some doctors are scientists.
Three Statements are given followed by Three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All plates are bowls.
No bowl is a glass.
Some glasses are vessels.
Conclusions:
I. Some glasses are plates.
II. Some bowls are plates.
III. Some vessels are bowls.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
1. All rugs are blankets.
2. All blankets are pillows.
3. Some blankets are frames.
Conclusions:
I. All pillows are rugs.
II. Some pillows are rugs.
III. All rugs are frames
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All polygons are angles.
All angles are diagonals.
All cones are cubes.
All cubes are decagons.
No diagonal is a cube.
Conclusions:
I. Some diagonals are polygons.
II. All diagonals are decagons.
III. No polygon is a cone.
IV. Some cubes are angles.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All T are G.
II. All G are H.
Conclusions:
I. All T are H.
II. No G is T.
III. All H are G.
Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All reds are pinks.
All whites are pinks.
All pinks are oranges.
Conclusions:
I. All whites are oranges.
II. All oranges are reds.
III. Some oranges are whites.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All R are M.
II. All L are M.
Conclusions:
I. Some M are not R.
II. Some L are R.
III. Some M are L.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All M are A.
II. No A is R.
Conclusion:
I. No M is R.
II. Some A are M.
III. Some R are A.
Three statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All c are f.
No f is t.
All p are c.
Conclusions:
I. Some t are c.
II. No p is t.
Important Questions from Conventional Syllogism
In this question, three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II have been given. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements: Some flats are apartments.
No apartment is a hall.
Some halls are rooms.
Conclusions: I. At least some rooms are flats.
II. No apartment is a room.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
I. Some blue are red.
II. Some green are red.
Conclusions:
I. No blue is green.
II. No red is green.
Given below are two statements, Consider these statements to be true even if they seem factuality absurd, Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statements?
Statements :
1. All vases are flowers.
2. No flowers is a plant.
Conclusions :
1. No vases is a plant.
2. Some plant are vases
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All A are S.
II. No D is A.
Conclusions:
I. Some S are A.
II. All S are D.
III. No A is D.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some land are hard.
II. No stone is land.
Conclusions:
I. Some hard are land.
II. Some stone are hard.
