Read the given statement and conclusions carefully. Decide which of the given conclusions is/are definitely TRUE from the statement. Statement: P > Q < S > T = R ≥ U > V. Conclusion I: V < S. Conclusion II: P > T
Only Conclusion I is True
The statement is P > Q < S > T = R ≥ U > V.
Conclusion I states V < S. From the statement, S > T = R ≥ U > V, so following the chain from S down to V gives S > V, which is the same as V < S.
This chain is fully connected through > and ≥ relations with no break, so Conclusion I is definitely true.
Conclusion II states P > T. The statement only links P to Q as P > Q < S, and there is no direct or chained relation connecting P to S, T, or R, since the direction reverses at Q.
Because P and T are never connected through a valid unbroken chain, Conclusion II cannot be established as definitely true.
Hence, the answer is only Conclusion I is true.
In a certain code language, ‘TERRAIN’ is written as ‘VETTAIP’ and ‘TRAFFIC’ is written as ‘VTHAHIE’. How will ‘MOTOR’ be written in that language?
Select the option that is related to the third word in the same way as the second word is related to the first word. (The words must be considered as meaningful English words and must not be related to each other based on the number of letters/number of consonants/vowels in the word) Pig : Piglets :: Deer : ?
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statements:
P = U < M < K ≤ I > N
Conclusions:
I. N ≥ K
II. I > PStatements:
P # B $ T; R & B $ S; L % R # Q
Conclusions:
I. P # Q
II. L & Q
III. T % S
IV. P # S
Statement:
R $ W % P; N & W # S; J % T @ N; K & T
Conclusions:
I. N # J
II. P # S
III. R @ P
IV. W $ K