Directions: Each of the following items in this section consists of a sentence, parts of which have been jumbled. These parts have been labelled as P, Q. R, and S. You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark (d). You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark your response accordingly by choosing the appropriate sequence given in the options (a), (b), (c) and (d).
(P) to women-led development and the dream of New India
(Q) India is moving from women's development
(R) and an equal partner in the country's overall development
(S) is where women are empowered, strong
This question requires rearranging jumbled sentence parts labeled P, Q, R, and S to form a meaningful and grammatically correct sentence. The topic focuses on the progression of women's roles and empowerment in India.
Let's break down each part:
To construct a logical sentence, we need to find a starting point, a transition, and a concluding description. Let's analyze the sequence QPRS:
Putting the parts together in the order QPRS yields the following coherent sentence:
Q: India is moving from women's development P: to women-led development and the dream of New India, S: where women are empowered, strong R: and an equal partner in the country's overall development.
This sequence effectively conveys the idea of India's progression from a focus solely on women's development to a broader vision of women-led development, where empowered women are integral partners in national progress.
Other sequences do not create a logically flowing sentence:
Therefore, the sequence QPRS is the correct arrangement that forms a meaningful sentence.
(P) facilitate the present and prospective entrepreneurs
(Q) for manufacturing and service units
(R) were notified in 2020, with guidelines to
(S) some new composite criteria of classification
Three statements are followed by conclusions numbered I, II. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Conclusions:
In this question, three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements.
Statements:
No rose is an orchid.
All roses are lilies.
All lilies are lotuses.
Conclusions:
I. Some lilies are orchids.
II. Some lotuses are orchids.
III. All lilies are orchids.
(P) considered to be paradigmatic (Q) sociological study of peasant movements in India (R) the Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often (S) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative
(P) social movements, nonetheless (Q) their political institutions, process, and parties (R) one of the major attributes of and with (S) is their coexistence with national states and
(P) most of the minerals are nationalized (Q) extraction of minerals in India (R) is possible only after the (S) government grants permission as