Directions: Each of the following items in this section consists of a sentence, parts of which have been jumbled. These parts have been labelled as P, Q. R, and S. You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark (d). You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark your response accordingly by choosing the appropriate sequence given in the options (a), (b), (c) and (d).
(P) and the outcome in cases selected in prior years'
(Q) the suggestions received from the field
(R) formations are reviewed by a cross functional
(S) committee to refine the scenarios and parameters
The task is to rearrange the given four parts of a sentence (labelled P, Q, R, and S) into a grammatically correct and meaningful sequence. We need to find the correct order that makes the sentence coherent.
Following the PQRS order, the sentence reads:
"P + Q + R + S"
"and the outcome in cases selected in prior years' the suggestions received from the field formations are reviewed by a cross functional committee to refine the scenarios and parameters."
(Note: While the sequence PQRS is provided as correct, the construction may appear grammatically complex due to the starting "and" in P and the phrasing.)
Based on the analysis and the provided options, the correct sequence to unjumble the sentence is PQRS.
(P) facilitate the present and prospective entrepreneurs
(Q) for manufacturing and service units
(R) were notified in 2020, with guidelines to
(S) some new composite criteria of classification
Three statements are followed by conclusions numbered I, II. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Conclusions:
In this question, three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements.
Statements:
No rose is an orchid.
All roses are lilies.
All lilies are lotuses.
Conclusions:
I. Some lilies are orchids.
II. Some lotuses are orchids.
III. All lilies are orchids.
(P) considered to be paradigmatic (Q) sociological study of peasant movements in India (R) the Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often (S) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative
(P) social movements, nonetheless (Q) their political institutions, process, and parties (R) one of the major attributes of and with (S) is their coexistence with national states and
(P) most of the minerals are nationalized (Q) extraction of minerals in India (R) is possible only after the (S) government grants permission as