Directions: Each of the following items in this section consists of a sentence, parts of which have been jumbled. These parts have been labelled as P, Q, R and S. Given below each sentence are four sequences, namely (a), (b), (c) and (d). You are required to rearrange 1 the jumbled parts of the sentence and mark your response 2 in the Answer Sheet accordingly.
(P) considered to be paradigmatic
(Q) sociological study of peasant movements in India
(R) the Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often
(S) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative
RPSQ
The correct order for these fragments to form a coherent sentence is R, P, S, Q.
"The Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often (R) considered to be paradigmatic (P) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative (S) sociological study of peasant movements in India (Q)."
Step 1: (R) provides the subject ("The Telangana peasant revolt...") and ends with the verb "is often," which requires a following adjective or past participle.
Step 2: (P) starts with "considered," perfectly completing the phrase "is often considered to be..."
Step 3: (S) begins with "and," which connects the first description ("paradigmatic") to the second description ("the only instance..."). It ends with the adjective "comparative."
Step 4: (Q) provides the noun phrase "sociological study" which is naturally modified by the adjective "comparative" from the previous fragment.
(P) facilitate the present and prospective entrepreneurs
(Q) for manufacturing and service units
(R) were notified in 2020, with guidelines to
(S) some new composite criteria of classification
Three statements are followed by conclusions numbered I, II. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Conclusions:
In this question, three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements.
Statements:
No rose is an orchid.
All roses are lilies.
All lilies are lotuses.
Conclusions:
I. Some lilies are orchids.
II. Some lotuses are orchids.
III. All lilies are orchids.
(P) considered to be paradigmatic (Q) sociological study of peasant movements in India (R) the Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often (S) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative
(P) social movements, nonetheless (Q) their political institutions, process, and parties (R) one of the major attributes of and with (S) is their coexistence with national states and
(P) most of the minerals are nationalized (Q) extraction of minerals in India (R) is possible only after the (S) government grants permission as