Directions: Each of the following items in this section consists of a sentence, parts of which have been jumbled. These parts have been labelled as P, Q. R, and S. You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark (d). You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark your response accordingly by choosing the appropriate sequence given in the options (a), (b), (c) and (d).
(P) that may push the viewers to
(Q) hours of content are shown in a way
(R) think that they are watching a
(S) programme rather than an advertisement
This question requires us to arrange the given jumbled parts of a sentence, labelled P, Q, R, and S, into a grammatically correct and logically coherent sequence. Let's examine each part:
| Part | Text |
| P | that may push the viewers to |
| Q | hours of content are shown in a way |
| R | think that they are watching a |
| S | programme rather than an advertisement |
We need to find the sequence that connects these parts logically. Let's analyze the provided correct sequence SQPR:
By arranging the parts in the sequence SQPR, we construct the following sentence:
S 'programme rather than an advertisement' + Q 'hours of content are shown in a way' + P 'that may push the viewers to' + R 'think that they are watching a'
This results in the sentence:
"programme rather than an advertisement hours of content are shown in a way that may push the viewers to think that they are watching a."
This sequence effectively conveys how content presentation aims to influence viewer perception, making advertisements seem more like programmes.
(P) facilitate the present and prospective entrepreneurs
(Q) for manufacturing and service units
(R) were notified in 2020, with guidelines to
(S) some new composite criteria of classification
Three statements are followed by conclusions numbered I, II. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Conclusions:
In this question, three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements.
Statements:
No rose is an orchid.
All roses are lilies.
All lilies are lotuses.
Conclusions:
I. Some lilies are orchids.
II. Some lotuses are orchids.
III. All lilies are orchids.
(P) considered to be paradigmatic (Q) sociological study of peasant movements in India (R) the Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often (S) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative
(P) social movements, nonetheless (Q) their political institutions, process, and parties (R) one of the major attributes of and with (S) is their coexistence with national states and
(P) most of the minerals are nationalized (Q) extraction of minerals in India (R) is possible only after the (S) government grants permission as