Directions: Each of the following items in this section consists of a sentence, parts of which have been jumbled. These parts have been labelled as P, Q. R, and S. You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark (d). You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark your response accordingly by choosing the appropriate sequence given in the options (a), (b), (c) and (d).
(P) organizing Rozgar Melas across the nation for
(Q) providing suitable job opportunities in the private sector to the youth
(R) National Skill Development Corporation under the aegis of MSDE has been
(S) to give impetus to the employment initiatives in the country
RPQS
This looks like a sentence arrangement (PQRS) question. Let's reorder it logically:
(R) National Skill Development Corporation under the aegis of MSDE has been
(P) organizing Rozgar Melas across the nation for
(Q) providing suitable job opportunities in the private sector to the youth
(S) to give impetus to the employment initiatives in the country
✅ Correct order: RPQS
Final sentence:
"National Skill Development Corporation under the aegis of MSDE has been organizing Rozgar Melas across the nation for providing suitable job opportunities in the private sector to the youth to give impetus to the employment initiatives in the country."
Three statements are followed by conclusions numbered I, II. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Conclusions:
In this question, three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements.
Statements:
No rose is an orchid.
All roses are lilies.
All lilies are lotuses.
Conclusions:
I. Some lilies are orchids.
II. Some lotuses are orchids.
III. All lilies are orchids.
(P) considered to be paradigmatic
(Q) sociological study of peasant movements in India
(R) the Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often
(S) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative
(P) its policy and announced reforms
(Q) that the mounting tension was heading
(R) the colonial Government, now seeing
(S) towards a crisis, wisely decided to change
(P) considered to be paradigmatic (Q) sociological study of peasant movements in India (R) the Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often (S) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative