All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which one of the following statements is correct with reference to a deductive argument?

This question was previously asked in
UGC NET 2019 Paper 1 Question Paper (5-Dec-2019) (Shift 2)
The correct answer is

The relation between premises and conclusion is one of logical necessity

To determine the correct statement about a deductive argument, it is important to understand what a deductive argument is. In logic, a deductive argument is one where the conclusion is necessarily true if the premises are true. This is because the conclusion follows with logical necessity from the premises.

Now, let us evaluate each of the given options based on this definition:

  1. Option 1: "The relation between premises and conclusion is one of matter of fact"
    • A "matter of fact" suggests an empirical observation, which is not inherent in deductive reasoning.
    • Deductive arguments rely on logical structure rather than empirical observations.
    • This option does not accurately describe the deductive process, and thus, it is incorrect.
  2. Option 2: "The relation between premises and conclusion is one of logical necessity"
    • In deductive arguments, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true due to logical necessity.
    • This accurately describes the nature of deductive reasoning, aligning with its characteristics.
    • Therefore, this option is correct.
  3. Option 3: "The relation between premises and conclusion is that of empirical necessity"
    • Empirical necessity refers to conclusions based on observed or experimental evidence.
    • Deductive arguments are not based on empirical evidence but on logical consistency.
    • Hence, this option does not fit the deductive context and is incorrect.
  4. Option 4: "The relation between premises and conclusion is a matter of ascertainment of probability"
    • Probability pertains to inductive reasoning where conclusions are likely or probable, not certain.
    • Deductive reasoning provides certainty given true premises, not mere probability.
    • Thus, this option is inappropriate for deductive reasoning and is incorrect.

Conclusion: Based on the evaluation above, the correct statement about a deductive argument is that "The relation between premises and conclusion is one of logical necessity."

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. Given below are two statements:
    Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
    Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
    In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  2. The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?

  3. A deductive argument is invalid if:

  4. Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:

  5. In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?

  6. The argument which claims that its conclusion is conclusively supported by its premises is called

  7. Which is an example of a correct deductive argument?

  8. The argument which claims that its conclusion is supported by its premises conclusively is:

  9. “The relation that exists between Premises and Conclusion is that of logical necessity” – is a case with which of the following arguments ?

  10. In a valid deductive argument, if the premises are true, then:


Important Questions from Deductive

  1. Given below are two statements:
    Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
    Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
    In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  2. The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?

  3. A deductive argument is invalid if:

  4. Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:

  5. In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?

Need Expert Advice?
Test Series
UGC NET img
Teaching
UGC NET (Paper 1) 2026 Mock Test Series
476 Tests 1 Tests Free
4.3(72)
English
More Questions from UGC NET

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App