“The relation that exists between Premises and Conclusion is that of logical necessity” – is a case with which of the following arguments ?
Deductive
The question asks which type of argument involves a relation of logical necessity between the premises and the conclusion. Let's evaluate the options one by one to determine the correct answer:
- Inductive Argument:
In an inductive argument, the premises provide probabilistic support to the conclusion. An inductive argument does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion, so the relationship between premises and conclusion is not one of logical necessity. Instead, they offer a likelihood or probability. Therefore, this is not the correct option.
- Demonstrative Argument:
The term "demonstrative" is often used to refer to a strong form of argumentation, like conclusive evidence. However, it is not specifically defined in logic as a type of argument distinct from deductive and inductive ones. Hence, this option is not the most appropriate answer in this context.
- Analogical Argument:
Analogical reasoning draws a conclusion based on the similarity between two situations. The relationship between premises and conclusion in analogical arguments is not one of logical necessity but of similarity. Thus, this is not the correct option.
- Deductive Argument:
In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true, the conclusion must necessarily also be true. Deductive arguments are structured such that the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion. This means that in a deductive argument, there's a logical necessity between the premises and the conclusion. Therefore, the correct answer is Deductive.
In conclusion, the correct answer is that the relation of logical necessity between premises and conclusion exists in a Deductive argument.
Similar Questions
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?
A deductive argument is invalid if:
Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:
In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?
The argument which claims that its conclusion is conclusively supported by its premises is called
Which is an example of a correct deductive argument?
The argument which claims that its conclusion is supported by its premises conclusively is:
In a valid deductive argument, if the premises are true, then:
Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the proposition - “All animals are wild”?
Important Questions from Deductive
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?
A deductive argument is invalid if:
Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:
In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?
