The argument which claims that its conclusion is supported by its premises conclusively is:
Deductive argument
To determine which type of argument claims that its conclusion is supported by its premises conclusively, let's examine the given options:
- Deductive argument: In a deductive argument, the conclusion is purported to follow necessarily from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. This type of argument is said to provide conclusive support for its conclusion.
- Demonstrative argument: This is not a standard term in logic. However, it might be used to refer to arguments that demonstrate something, but it isn't precisely defined in terms of conclusive support like a deductive argument.
- Analogical argument: An analogical argument suggests that because two things are similar in one or more respects, they are similar in some other respect. This type of argument does not provide conclusive support, as it relies on the analogy's strength.
- Inductive argument: In an inductive argument, premises provide some degree of probability, but not certainty, for the conclusion. Induction does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion even if the premises are true.
Based on the descriptions above, the correct answer is a Deductive argument, as it claims that its conclusion is conclusive if the premises are true.
Similar Questions
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?
A deductive argument is invalid if:
Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:
In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?
The argument which claims that its conclusion is conclusively supported by its premises is called
Which is an example of a correct deductive argument?
“The relation that exists between Premises and Conclusion is that of logical necessity” – is a case with which of the following arguments ?
In a valid deductive argument, if the premises are true, then:
Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the proposition - “All animals are wild”?
Important Questions from Deductive
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?
A deductive argument is invalid if:
Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:
In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?
