The argument which claims that its conclusion is conclusively supported by its premises is called
Deductive Argument
Arguments are broadly divided into deductive and inductive types by the strength of the link claimed between premises and conclusion. A deductive argument is one that claims its conclusion follows with necessity from its premises — that is, if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true, so the premises are said to support the conclusion conclusively (or with certainty). This claim of conclusive, necessary support is the defining mark of a deductive argument.
An inductive argument, by contrast, claims only that its premises make the conclusion probable or likely, not certain; the support is a matter of degree, so it never claims conclusive support. An analogical argument is a particular kind of inductive reasoning that infers a further similarity from observed similarities and again offers only probable support. A demonstrative argument is not the standard label used in this classification for the claim of conclusive support; the term that squarely denotes an argument whose premises are claimed to conclusively establish the conclusion is deductive.
Therefore the argument that claims its conclusion is conclusively supported by its premises is a deductive argument.
Correct answer: Deductive Argument
Similar Questions
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?
A deductive argument is invalid if:
Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:
In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?
Which is an example of a correct deductive argument?
The argument which claims that its conclusion is supported by its premises conclusively is:
“The relation that exists between Premises and Conclusion is that of logical necessity” – is a case with which of the following arguments ?
In a valid deductive argument, if the premises are true, then:
Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the proposition - “All animals are wild”?
Important Questions from Deductive
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?
A deductive argument is invalid if:
Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:
In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?
